A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Engineer in Engineering (201-500 employees employees)
Pros
The common framework tools are all built in: interface translations to different languages , caching the results of queries and user information, or template rendering (redis/memcache are supported natively), simplified database access (the framework's native CakePHP ORM supports ActiveRecord and Datamapper patterns to access data on database) validation of data input from end users, middleware authentication.
The framework also natively support rest API calls that seamlessly work with your environment and XHR requests. Combining this with their built in magical methods that greatly reduce writing time, it is easy to develop API calls in.
There is also an extensive support for CLI based utilities developed on top of your web application: these various console applications are ideal for handling the usual background tasks/jobs that occur outside of the HTTP request-response cycle. In any CakePHP console application you can can reuse your application classes already developed for the web app, which just adds to the native extensibility.
Cons
The biggest issue inherit in CakePHP, and why we switched to Laravel, is the base configuration of the program. Most people aree that CakePHP uses old (outdated, even dangerous) PHP habits. There is some truth in this: Cake has not been as quick to adapt to the newer PHP versions as they should. I was always surprised that with new major releases, from 2.4 to 2.5 for example, that the minimum version of PHP will never increase. For example, CakePHP only requires version 5.2.8 of PHP, but it would not have been difficult to update the minimum version at least 5.3 when adapting a new version.
Speed - our company had many issues scaling CakePHP to a medium size application software, even with using REDIS/memcache we would still run into many issues with the built-in ORM.
Return on Investment
Negative Impact - we ended up having to rewrite our entire web-application from CakePHP to Laravel.
Alternatives Considered
Laravel PHP Framework, Symfony and Zend PHP Engine
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Project Manager in Research & Development (1-10 employees employees)
Pros
Easy learning curve
Can be used by new developers without paying a formation
The MVC is pretty well implemented
Cons
Some tutorials from the official cakephp website show incorrect examples (some code that should be placed in models instead of controllers)
Relationships in models are not easy to use (OneToMany, HasOne)
Switching databases logic could be improved
Return on Investment
The positive impact is that is a flexible tool. We cannot talk about financials or productivity ROI, it's hard to quote.