Emma by Marigold Pricing

“Too expensive for some clients Number of contacts included does not increase at each pricing tier. … Many small companies prefer MailChimp for the free or much cheaper versions.”

“Very cost effective for our list size and what we were using it for (price increases based on number of emails sent each month).”

“I believe one of the areas of improvement is available but it would depend on your pricing plan. … Only time I hit a bump in the road is when I was asked to change the style sheet and did not know that the pricing plan I was on did not include this feature.”

“We later found Mailchimp a bit cheaper and easier to work with in our specific use case but I still think it's worth testing Emma if you're looking for an email marketing program.”

“For the price, Emma packs in all the "wow" features into a neat package that makes email marketing super easy.”

“The onboarding process was super extensive and awesome, but the person that did that process has now left our company and we wish we could do that again, but it would cost us more money even though...”

“Emma was the perfect solution for what we were looking for due to its easy to use interface, relatively low cost and basic functionality.”

“Campaigner does offer white labeling but their pricing is outrageously higher than Emma, their customer service isn't nearly as good and their tool isn't as intuitive or easy to use.”

“The time investment of designing the newsletter is definitely worth it - it's a quick way of reaching thousands of our supporters.”