Indeed Ads (Sponsored Jobs)Formerly Indeed AdvertisingPricing

pricing ability to automate process … pay by click or by applicant, either way it is too expensive. … Indeed Ads (Sponsored Jobs) previously cost our company thousands of dollars a month. Now using

Indeed Ads (Sponsored Jobs) excel in reaching to broad audience and cost-effective tool, it provides detailed analytics which includes metrics, views

Clearer cost options

positions to fill and want to fill them quickly. It may not be worth the extra cost for us during times when recruiting is not as much of a focus. … It has helped our brand recognition by getting more visibility. Less expensive than other advertising methods, such as print…

works well with us to help ensure that our hiring needs are met in an affordable and effective manner. We're always looking for new products, and our team … It's allowed us to hire candidates faster. Cost per hire has increased significantly over the last year, but that has…

Indeed generally continues to remove functionality and/or charge more or charge the same amount with fewer features. Case in point: you used to be … have decreased over time. They are offering their customers less and less value.

coverage. I do find that while I get fewer applicants from them, the price is much cheaper per applicant than Indeed. … Cost is getting exponentially higher. 10 … Reach a large number of candidates quickly. Cost has risen greatly over the past year. We

Look at pricing, it is expensive. … several times a day. I along with one other Administrative Assistant are in charge of all Indeed Ads across the country for our company. We place ads, converse … Cost is too high. Turn around is great. Applicant quality can be a bit…

Price Product Features Product Reputation Prior Experience with the Product

Cost Geographic postings Sponsorship cost based on geography … CPA has gone as high as $65/app. I do not see a reason to have such a high cost. The time to hire for less costly roles has been good. Geographic sponsoring

Cost is too high for small companies Too restrictive with our multiple posts, we have several to cover all of MA/RI/NH … The cost is too high … Indeed does source candidates, but the cost is too high

the process. Also, you are made aware of what price you are paying for the ad and what the average price per day is. … The cost per hire has proven to be worth it due to the quality applicants that we … Price Product Features Product Usability Working

six months, so tracking true ROI on time to hire is hard to dive into. The cost per hire has increased over the last couple of years due to how competitive

and/or decreasing staffing agency spending. I would suggest that to maximize value, organizations need to also focus on their worker satisfaction through employee

of the overall account budget. While I know we could change our setup and price each opening accordingly, there are times within our end of the month when

changed the way I hire and has proved to be a winning strategy for delivering value every time. The customer service is excellent and they go out of their way

Swift hires - Positive. Cost savings - Positive. Applicant quality - Positive. Applicant quantity - Positive

Competitive cost per hire compared to other paid resources.

that the functionality will be changing. Reporting function is helpful. The cost per hire is high for sponsored ads.

screening. Communication between employer and potential candidate. Setting up cost you are comfortable with. … Cost per hire. Applicant quality. Time saver.

More applicants. Lower cost to hire with new structure.

Time to hire. Cost per hire.

Price is quite high for keeping a sponsored job post. Not getting candidates to

The cost can sometimes be extremely high in certain markets for certain roles.

Cost of services.