Litmus from ValidityPricing

Significantly more expensive than competitors … It's more appropriate for large enterprise businesses that can afford it.

integrated litmus, the cost a SF integration does not justify the usage … They do support, at a high cost … The price for SF integration is

integration with other MA platforms More Personalization capabilities Better pricing

Can’t afford the integration that’s only in the highest pricing tier … (everything that’s not email previews) are not that useful Integrations Pricing model 8

time saved not needing to manually test emails across multiple devices cost saves by not having to have all those devices on hand

integrations, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. The value we get from these features at a reasonable price point made it the best choice for our team. Additionally … We selected Litmus primarily due to its balance of cost and functionality compared to other platforms.…

it does have it works extremely well. Additionally, I think that for the price that it costs, it is well worth the money to make sure our users have a quality … started. Because of the ease of use, timeliness, consistent quality, and affordability that Litmus offers, I haven'…

It still deliver us the value by which we intend

Limitation of users and cost.

Better pricing. Connection with Figma. Connection with our CRM. … Reduction in mailable population and ESP cost. Better open

images), it is definitely not worth using Litmus. Litmus is also quite expensive so would only recommend it for businesses that can utilize the tool more … allowed us for better collaboration with cross-functional teams (that are in charge of related parts of emails such as…

Email QA and verification at a reasonable price Alerts and recommendations on email performance and deliverability Basic

both marketing companies that want to support their customers and provide value to their services, as well as business owners, both small and large, who

price

approval for expenditure in the future will be a tough sell due to enterprise cost ($26k).

employed. This is a huge miss to help teams be more agile and find more value in the platform.

Expensive for the number of previews it includes UI can be confusing Limited templates

Retain previous renders rather than charging each time I want to load the same code to view it again Provide code from

Litmus could offer cheaper plans for folks who just want to render test. 2. Litmus could offer more

testing so much easier than doing it manually. The Litmus pricing model is fine and good value for money, but as a bootstrapped startup, instead of subscribing … Pricing model

yourself from an email builder). However, I think that everyone can find value in Litmus at any level.

Pricing between standard & Enterprise levels, it's a massive jump from one to the

Increase the efficiency Cost saving Competitive advance

email newsletters for one of our product branches, and it brings a lot of value because it reduces testing time many times over. We use Litmus to test email … email newsletters for one of our product branches, and it brings a lot of value because it reduces testing time many times over. In fact, most of the staff … features, although I'm sure they are great feat…

can be improved Routing at API documentation is broken, still not fixed Price per preview can be reduced futher