Litmus from Validity Pricing

“We ended up downgrading our Litmus subscription to a cheaper plan that doesn't have SFMC integration because the cost to benefit ratio wasn't there for this additional feature.”

“The cost can be a lot if you are not using every feature so in that case, it becomes difficult to afford for a small team on a budget, but it is worth it if you are looking for a large email... … However, the middle-tier plan should allow you to integrate with your ESP.”

“Additionally, I think that for the price that it costs, it is well worth the money to make sure our users have a quality experience with our emails.”

“

“However, email on acid is cheaper but litmus still provides a better value proposition with its complete package.”

“Unfortunately, this function is only available in more expensive versions of Litmus, so the startup I am currently working with has a limited marketing budget, and doesn't have the ability to use... … Collaborative review only available with more advanced, more expensive packages.”

“I've used it with and without integration, and to be honest, paying for the integration is not worth the cost.”

“That said, the price is a bit more expensive and it still doesn't replace all of our tools.”

“Renderings not always perfectly reflecting real rendering environments More transparency around cost to upgrade from basic to enterprise Make it easier to see what % of our monthly usage we've used up.”

“Enterprise pricing is extremely expensive.”

“The price point is high for small businesses, I would hope they could offer something more cost flexible for those.”