Metadata.io Pricing

“Positive ROI on inbound leads coming in through the platform Offload ABM management to keep internal resources freed up ROI was positive at the intro price but not at the upped price. … Dashboard was hard to utilize, they needed to walk us through it Knowledge of LinkedIn nuances were less than expected First 6 month intro pricing was affordable but then prices spiked.”

“Ability to use the Google Ads functions is very frustration and not worth the cost we paid due to 1 keyword to 1 campaign structure.”

“Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates 90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30% Saving us hundreds... … For a small team like ours, this tool has allowed us to spend much less time managing budget and optimizing ads and given us more time to focus on testing new content, ads, and audiences.”

“We get more out of our budget through metadata's budget optimizer and we can optimize towards down-funnel results, not just ToF leads.”

“Pricing is competitive and affordable.”

“Slower time-to-launch campaigns Comparable lead generation Reduced ROI due to added software cost of Metadata. … Ease of Use / User Interface Campaign Management Ad Spend / Budget Management.”

“Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least).”

“More Leads Less Expensive Leads More assistance in launching campaigns Ability to target better than native platforms Ability to split test better than native platforms.”

“Paid Advertising Revenue Reporting B2B Audiences for Traditionally B2C Advertising Platforms Automated Budget and Spend Optimization.”

“We were looking to scale our paid social and paid search campaigns without hiring an expensive (and often ineffective) agency.”

“It's also great for teams that don't have the resources to spend a lot of time setting up ads, allocating budget, and adjusting campaigns based on performance.”