AI Driven Quality Engineering All it does BrowserStack
October 20, 2025
AI Driven Quality Engineering All it does BrowserStack
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Enterprise
Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack
I am using BrowserStack for cross browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual testing and Accessibility testing. Exploring LowCode recently. The major business problem that gets addressed is Real time testing in real devices rather than simulators or emulators. Also when it comes to compliance, BrowserStack's Accessibility helps way better than other tools in the market in making WCAG 2.XX compliances and testing ease and effortless and automating it too.
Pros
- Cross browser testing with its Device farm
- Accessibility testing
- Percy - Visual testing tool
- Test management
Cons
- I see they have Low code and AI driven automation. But still there is more room for improvement in this area to make it easier for automation testers.
- If they have some integration to convert existing Selenium tests into LowCode tests, would be great for QE's
- Accessibility
- Mobile device farm
- Percy
- LowCode
- Observability
- We had 20% ROI recently which is very positive through Accessibility.
- In terms of Automated regression tests, Considerable improvement in running tests parallely in a device farm and multiple browser versions and types, which helps faster releases and less cycles.
Heavy Regression cycles
Simulators - no real feedback
No AI driven
Manual Accessibility check
Visual stare and compare
Simulators - no real feedback
No AI driven
Manual Accessibility check
Visual stare and compare
- Accessibility Testing
Really helped very well in testing and meeting WCAG standards for our customers. They provided unlimited screens and users which really made cost effective comparing to other vendors and features are matching the real requirements.
Features, Cost effective.
Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?
Yes
Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BrowserStack again?
Yes
Using BrowserStack
50 - QA, DEV
- Accessibility
- Visual testing
- Automation
- Accessibility testing
- AI test case generation
- AI Driven QA
Evaluating BrowserStack and Competitors
- Cloud Solutions
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
AI Driven and Leveraging latest AI features
BrowserStack Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved No escalation required Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
Not, SO far not required
Yes - Resolved with few calls back and forth
When we were evaluating BrowserStack Percy, We have requested for few configurations to skip certain area in a webpage which may lead false failures, They really took very serious and helped over the call with tech team.
Using BrowserStack
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | Requires technical support |
- Cross browser testing
- Mobile testing
- Visual testing
- Accessibility testing
- Mobile testing
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation