Overall Satisfaction with Cisco AnyConnect
Currently, my organization uses Cisco AnyConnect to connect its employees who are remote. We manage it in conjunction with the
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) in this scenario. It is very easy to administer. We currently have about 300 simultaneous sessions per day under an ASA 5580. It is a very useful tool when it comes to developing VPNs and user groups. Integrating it with an AD and DUO is the perfect remote security combination for a VPN.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) in this scenario. It is very easy to administer. We currently have about 300 simultaneous sessions per day under an ASA 5580. It is a very useful tool when it comes to developing VPNs and user groups. Integrating it with an AD and DUO is the perfect remote security combination for a VPN.
- VPNs
- User Groups
- Security
- Traffic monitoring by user
- Application monitoring
- Web application filtering
- Good return on investment
- Cost-benefit ratio
- Compatibility
Yes, the tool helps users to connect securely to the corporate network. An army of engineers is not required to administer access to the administrative network, which makes it easy to administer and for users. It is very friendly, you can connect to a public IP or to a domain depending on what is required.
Palo Alto and Fortinet are good manufacturers but more than 5 years ago when the project was tendered, Cisco ASA was better for the cost, benefit, and approval apart from the fact that we have Cisco ISE, Cisco DUO and all those tools converge quite well when you have the complete solution.