Item: GoodData
Rating: 7
Author: Michal Kolomý

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

GD is used on daily basis with majority of users. We use modules Dashboards, Reports and analysis.

GD is not suitable for analytisc people as for example Tableau

Pros and Cons

Simplicity
nativ UI
MAQL

Analyze module has not the same fetaures as Reports module

Return on Investment

Good value for the price
Due to its simplicity, it is suitable for most users in the company

Usability

6

As mentioned before, GD is simple visualisation system for delivery of static report to the majority of people. Unfortunately, it is less suitable for users such as data enginers.

Implementation

I joined the company only after the introduction of gooddata.

Self-Service Analytics

I benefit most from the fact that I can easily define metrics via MAQL. For me is module Reports more powerfull than module Analyze.

Integrations

We haven't intergrated other tools to GD

Key Insights

Do you think GoodData delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with GoodData's feature set?

No

Did GoodData live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of GoodData go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy GoodData again?

Yes

Alternatives Considered

Tableau Online

For analysts, Tableau is far better because of better graph visualization. Tableau does not need to deal with the amount of uploaded data. Our company uses Gooddata because of its unbeatable price.

Good value for the price

Overall Satisfaction with GoodData