Intercom - light and efficient
Overall Satisfaction with Intercom
We currently use Intercom to provide proactive support with outbound messaging and product tours, and to provide reactive support through the help desk and articles products. Our help desk coverage is on a smaller scale than our core business support team.
Pros
- for support, complete context around user details like browser, OS, pages viewed, actions taken
- easy to use, easy to customize interface
- tagging system for help desk conversations allows for flexible tracking
Cons
- reporting features are limited - I can't always splice or filter data the way I want
- articles editor can be unforgiving
- I can't speak for the marketing team who work with the outbound messaging series and features.
- For Support, we had excellent ticket times, really high CSAT survey completion rates, and a variety of ways to report on support volume and trends.
We integrate Intercom with Salesforce CRM, Statuspage, our user events database, Slack (for users). The Marketing team may integrate Intercom with some additional tooling on their side.
We used Intercom in addition to Salesforce (where we provided support for our core business customers), and to Ada (core business customer chat interface). Because we had a separate product with a smaller, more lightweight business base, Intercom was perfect for providing support without spinning up a bulky, highly configured instance of Salesforce for chat and email support.
Do you think Fin by Intercom delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Fin by Intercom's feature set?
Yes
Did Fin by Intercom live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Fin by Intercom go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Fin by Intercom again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation