Miro from the perspective of a UX-Student and Professional Developer
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
It is used for quick collaboration, taking notes, using templates for guiding retrospectives. There are some issues with licensing (only a select few users have the option to create boards, who then invite others to collaborate). Summative, I would say it is not as widely adopted due to that. There are also other options (M365 Powerpoint Slides, Microsoft Whiteboard) used, which in turn dilute the focus on where one might find relevant information about other teams' work.
Pros
- Layout.
- Handling large boards.
- Templates, Getting up to speed quickly.
- Learning tips, introducing new features.
Cons
- License management.
- Plans for education and FOSS.
- Improved Productivity.
- Information is readily available.
- Project members can bring themselves up to speed asynchronously.
Extremely well, it depends of course whether the users are already familiar with the tool.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
- MURAL (formerly Mural.ly)
I perceive it as the market leader. Maturity, usability is all beyond what the other tools deliver IMHO.


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation