Many features and capabilities, but easy to jump in with little training!
March 21, 2022
Many features and capabilities, but easy to jump in with little training!
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
I have mainly used Miro to develop visual graphics, such as flowcharts and diagrams to map processes and digital structure. I have also used it as a team planning board to provide feedback on project successes and failures, as well as a board to track tasks and their progress.
- Ability to customize graphics (size, color, etc)
- Ability to Export images for use in other software
- (Free) training sessions to learn many Miro hidden capabilities
- Layering of frames (I cannot select a single element when there is a frame over it)
- Locking process connectors to overlap or to a specific line on the grid
- Saving a version as a backup
- Locking content/assigning a user (or attributing contributions?)
- Increased engagement
- Informal platform
- Reduced costs in software
- Reduced time/efforts in developing tools
Collaboration and engagement have improved, especially with users who have used Miro in the past or use it on other projects. It is nice to have a live, accessible (anytime from anywhere) whiteboard for a team or project (with managed access and unlimited space).
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Miro is a bit more intuitive and user-friendly. Jira can be intimidating to new users and difficult to follow without proper training. However, Jira and Microsoft Teams allow for individually labeling and categorizing tasks, as well as allocating resources. The tasks can be marked and tracked with statuses. Miro is more informal in its use. We use a collaboration of the platforms, integrating them as necessary, able, and appropriate.