Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We use Miro to show initial UI/UX flows for software development. It allows us to transform software requirements into visual flows that we can demonstrate to our internal (developers, marketing, adjacent departments, etc) and external (contractors, customers, etc) stakeholders to make sure we understand the approach and agree on the concepts.
- Intuitive workflows
- Versioning
- Presentation mode
- easy conversion to high resolution imaging
- more roles with more access types
- Breakout comments by user with user initials instead of every comment being yellow
- Reduced time from requirements to concept
- Increased productivity
- Faster approval from stakeholders
Nearly everyone in my organization can easily access the Miro boards to review our UI/UX designer's concepts and approve them. They can also start to get a feel for the flow of the app. It has also been helpful for us to agree on a theme for the app.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Figma has a better way of displaying comments based on a user's initials and creating high-resolution images. I also enjoy the presentation mode in Figma a little better than in Miro. Otherwise, these two applications have a lot of similarities in terms of capabilities. Miro is a little easier to access by my organization and share with contractors.