Overall Satisfaction with Miro
I use Miro to facilitate workshops and host collaborative project spaces with cross functional teams.
- Project knowledge base - creates single source of truth
- Creates a space to synthesize diverse perspectives and pieces of information
- Creates working space for large team workshops to collaborate
- Large boards can become slow to load, slow to navigate
- handling access - passwords seem to sometimes get out of sync for different users
- Quality of thinking improved - less obvious ideas, going beyond the known
- Improved productivity - brings people together through collaborative workshops
During Covid, this was obviously essential and replaced some physical types of spaces and workshops in my role. After Covid, the reality is there is still a mix of hybrid work that will always remain, and so this functionality is still highly desired to keep distributed team members across locations or to enable in and out of office/WFH days seamless.
Mural - seemed like it was pretty similar, but MIRO was liked better because of the community and availability to get many different templates of common innovation tools.
Figma - some of the interface navigation was less intuitive, deeper tool for design heavy users, but less friendly to cross-functionals
Figma - some of the interface navigation was less intuitive, deeper tool for design heavy users, but less friendly to cross-functionals
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes