Effective collaboration is key.
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Collaboration ...collaboration ...collaboration. Our virtual wall of ideas, thought starters, problem solving and defining solutions. Then building explainable diagrams and flows ..lately supporting the need for XAI (Explainable AI) and the ability to export diagram assets as PDFs for our documentation store. Workshops with stakeholders, large teams or small 1:2:1s. All in one place.
Pros
- Collaborative workshops and working sessions
- Diagrams and flows
- Documentation of decision making both creative and technical
- Offering a global view of my entire product landscape
Cons
- Finding the new tables a bit buggy
- Have had some minor security issues with users I thought I assigned to a board but ended up being assigned to a group. Think the UX in the user security area could be improved.
- At times the switch from touch-pad to mouse isn't great.
- Effective remote collaboration saves $$ on airmiles.
- Breaking free of decks into an environment where we can move freely, trace ideation through to visualisation has reduced sign-off timeframes.
Massively. It saved us during lock-down.
FigJams integration with Figma UXUI and prototyping is pretty good but as a standalone collaboration tool, it isn't Miro. lucidchart just felt 'clunky' and not as intuitive and 'precise' as Miro.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation