Must have system for FP&A professionals
Overall Satisfaction with Vena
We use Vena across the organization in different capacities: Budgeting and forecasting by department for OPEX, CAPEX, and Workforce. For variance reporting and analysis by department, entity, and consolidated. For Executive and Board reporting, standalone and consolidated. We implemented Vena 3 years ago, which completely automated our budgeting process and financial reporting. It also enhanced our security and how financial and HR data are transmitted across the organization. We have two entities with two different currencies and almost 20 departments in each country. Vena helped us in breaking the budget to smaller pieces and enabled us to handle the increasing numbers of departments and users who manage budget. If I would to replace Vena and go back to manual budgeting and reporting, I would need at least 4 more people on my team.
Pros
- Budgeting and forecasting
- Financial reporting
- security and privacy
- Flexibility
Cons
- Can't think of anything
- 4 FTE savings in FP&A
- Enhancing security and privacy
Implementation happened by the Vena team.
Do you think Vena delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Vena's feature set?
Yes
Did Vena live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Vena go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Vena again?
Yes
Vena Feature Ratings
Vena Solutions Attributes
Using Vena
35 - Over 35 users in my organization use Vena. Majority are department heads and in many instances more than one user for one department. We have two superusers in Finance and we plan to expand the usage to include operating (non-financial) data and utilize Vena insight and Vena Copilot. We started with only 15 users 3 years ago.
2 - One of my team members is fully dedicated to Vena and I do support sometimes.
- Budgeting
- Budget variance reporting
- Workforce reporting
- Financial Statements
- Automate budget process
- Connect different cubes
- Automate financial reporting
- Utilize Vena for more insights from non-financial data
Evaluating Vena and Competitors
- Cloud Solutions
- Scalability
- Ease of Use
- Other
Ease of use and utilizing excel was the most important factor as it was very hard to get rid of excel and to give power to budget holders. Vena enabled my organization to provide more power and control to budget holders with very easy to use budget tool while being able to consolidate and have centralized one source of the truth.
I think I would do the same evaluation I went through. I went through extensive evaluation.
Vena Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | Need to explain problems multiple times |
I did not. I didn't think my organization needs it at this point. Maybe in the future.
The structure of my organization changed and another layer was created between departments and CEO, called division. I reached out to Vena support in an attempt to find ways to tweak the structure on Vena to match that change. I was helped by two different support members and they were very patient with me to find a solution that would work for my situation, even though it wasn't an issue. Finally, one of them came up with a brilliant solution that was very easy to implement and all reports and views and security changed automatically based on that tweak in the modeler.
Using Vena
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | Difficult to use |
- Running reports on Excel
- Budgeting on Excel that's connected to the database


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation