Levelled up our project management capabilities
January 09, 2026

Levelled up our project management capabilities

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Wrike

It is used as a project management tool within our internal creative studio. We use it to receive briefs (via forms), manage all tasks, communicate with stakeholders and each other, and to produce statistics about our productivity and output through the year. We also use it to communicate directly with external suppliers, such as printers, so they can be plugged directly into tasks.

Pros

  • Communication - it is easy to assign and tag people directly, and they can see the history of the job so far
  • Organisation - it is easy to group tasks of the same type, using tagging and folders
  • Reporting

Cons

  • Reporting - it can sometimes be difficult (or non-intuitive) to report things that aren't a specific 'Wrike metric'. For example I want to create a dashboard that filters by 2 different folder tags, so that I can report on task numbers, but I can't filter more than once for location as far as I can see.
  • I would also like to see some simple, easy ways of reporting things like - highest number of hours on a task, task that was active the longest etc. The kinds of metrics that were included in the Wrike round-up email at the end of the year would be interesting to report on throughout the year.
  • Project and task functionalities - we trip up over this quite a lot, why can we not create dashboards or reports that report on both projects and tasks?
  • Why are projects harder to find and less intuitive to engage with?
  • We now avoid creating projects because they don't behave the same way as tasks and they can't be reported on at the same time as tasks.
  • Project planning - it is quite difficult plotting out projects on a calendar view or GANTT chart. It is overly complicated to see what you're looking at and to plot the tasks.
  • It would be helpful to set multiple key dates within the task, e.g. deadline for studio, production deadline, go-live date.
  • It would also be good to be able to set multiple statuses at once
  • Improved collaboration and feedback collection
  • Improved overall work quality due to team visibility
We have used the automation features to write message prompts when action is needed. Beyond that we haven't utilised these all that much.
I think overall it's intuitive and easy to use.

Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?

Yes

Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Wrike again?

Yes

It is perfect for receiving, managing and delivering the outcomes of creative briefs.

It is less good for planning / plotting wider scopes of work, because it can be too complicated and non-intuitive. For example it would be good to have a planning function that doesn't instantly connect to / create a task - because the planning happens before the tasks necessarily exist.

It's also hard to search for tasks, unless you use exact wording, more intelligent search functionality would be a massive help.

Wrike Feature Ratings

Task Management
10
Resource Management
8
Gantt Charts
1
Scheduling
9
Workflow Automation
5
Team Collaboration
10
Support for Agile Methodology
Not Rated
Support for Waterfall Methodology
Not Rated
Document Management
7
Email integration
7
Mobile Access
Not Rated
Timesheet Tracking
10

Comments

More Reviews of Wrike