TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Adobe Target vs. Constructor.io Search vs. Coveo Relevance Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Adobe Target

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAdobe Test and Target is an A/B, multi-variate testing platform which Adobe acquired as part of the Omniture platform in 2009. It is now part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It offers tight integration with Adobe analytics and content management products.N/A

    Constructor.io Search

    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Constructor Search promises to improve conversions and revenue from onsite and in-app search, using search science and artificial intelligence, Constructor's cloud-based search-as-a-service solution uses natural language processing, machine learning-enhanced results ranking, collaborative personalization, and merchant controls to power enterprise-grade onsite and in-app search. Whether search results are optimized for relevance, revenue, conversions, conversations — or all of the…N/A

    Coveo Relevance Cloud

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ACoveo is an enterprise search technology which can index data on disparate cloud systems making it easier to retrieve. It has integrated plug-ins for Salesforce.com, Sitecore CEP, and Microsoft Outlook and SharePoint.

    $600

    per month

    Pricing
    Adobe TargetConstructor.io SearchCoveo Relevance Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Base
    $600
    per month
    Pro
    $1,320
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Adobe TargetConstructor.io SearchCoveo Relevance Cloud
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Adobe TargetConstructor.io SearchCoveo Relevance Cloud
    Considered Multiple Products
    Adobe
    No answer on this topic
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answer on this topic
    Coveo
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    47%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Adobe TargetConstructor.io SearchCoveo Relevance Cloud
    Testing and Experimentation
    Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Adobe Target and Constructor.io Search and Coveo Relevance Cloud
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Constructor.io Search
    -
    Ratings
    Coveo Relevance Cloud
    -
    Ratings
    a/b experiment testing9.318 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Split URL testing8.617 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multivariate testing7.817 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-page/funnel testing8.314 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cross-browser testing8.39 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile app testing8.57 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test significance8.415 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual / WYSIWYG editor7.315 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced code editor6.414 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Page surveys8.77 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visitor recordings8.59 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Preview mode8.116 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test duration calculator7.916 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Experiment scheduler8.315 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Experiment workflow and approval7.612 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic experiment activation7.412 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Client-side tests7.915 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Server-side tests7.410 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mutually exclusive tests7.816 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audience Segmentation & Targeting
    Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Adobe Target and Constructor.io Search and Coveo Relevance Cloud
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.2
    18 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Constructor.io Search
    -
    Ratings
    Coveo Relevance Cloud
    -
    Ratings
    Standard visitor segmentation7.918 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Behavioral visitor segmentation7.417 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Traffic allocation control8.418 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Website personalization9.216 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Adobe Target and Constructor.io Search and Coveo Relevance Cloud
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Constructor.io Search
    -
    Ratings
    Coveo Relevance Cloud
    -
    Ratings
    Heatmap tool7.58 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Click analytics7.515 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scroll maps8.88 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form fill analysis8.28 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Conversion tracking8.515 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Goal tracking8.117 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test reporting7.918 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Results segmentation8.316 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    CSV export8.115 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Experiments results dashboard7.218 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Adobe TargetConstructor.io SearchCoveo Relevance Cloud
    Small Businesses
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Algolia
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Algolia
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Elasticsearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Algolia
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Amazon CloudSearch
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Adobe TargetConstructor.io SearchCoveo Relevance Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (46 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.3
    (24 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.1
    (14 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    6.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    3.5
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Adobe TargetConstructor.io SearchCoveo Relevance Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Adobe
    If you're using the Adobe stack and tools to power your website, Target is a great solution to implement. I've utilized Target within two organizations, one running on Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), and the other on Adobe Magento. I don't see how companies could harness the full capacity of Target without also having Adobe Analytics integrated. This is their 'secret sauce' and might not be a good solution for companies who are invested in Google Analytics 360. Integration was straightforward but did require support from the Adobe team to implement successfully. While Target is a great tool for digital teams to support, you'll need your tech team aligned and available to support implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    Constructor.io Search takes all of the guesswork out of maintaining a search engine. As merchandisers or product teams, we have educated guesses at how search relevance should work but the customer is always king. We can't always predict the ways in which consumers will search or what their intent is. That's why the behavioral-driven approach that Constructor.io employs works so well. It means that merchandisers can focus on their sales and promotional responsibilities, instead of wasting time and bandwidth on base-level relevance questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Coveo
    Coveo Relevance Cloud is a great solution to implement into Salesforce to provide Knowledge-Centered Support, Enhancements to a Customer Community, to provide sales aids, or to complement your customized app in Salesforce.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Adobe
    • This application gives us an incredible integration with Adobe Analytics that allows its operation to be the best and determine the performance of our website.
    • It offers us an analysis based on user behavior and a web page customization option to adapt and meet the needs of those users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    • Optimizes for business KPIs, not string matches, so merchandisers can focus on strategy instead of maintaining a dictionary.
    • Gives merchandisers control to curate the right customer experience per their expert understanding.
    • Customer/technical support during and after implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Coveo
    • Coveo is fast, search results come up quick (though it's not always great).
    • Not much complexity to run.
    • Coveo is implemented within our portal and doesn't require extra steps to use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Adobe
    • This is something a lot of testing tools struggle with, but I think the WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") editor - or Visual Experience Composer (VEC) in Adobe terminology - could definitely use some work. It's a struggle to execute many tests beyond simple copy, color, placement changes, and even the features that do exist are often clunky if not altogether broken.
    • The interface itself can be a bit counterintuitive in certain parts. If you are familiar with other tools, it's likely middle of the road in this respect; think much easier to understand than Monetate for instance, but a far cry from the simplicity of an Optimizely.
    • It can be a bit buggy from time to time. The worst example is the frequency at which the tool will fail to save due to an error, but not inform you of this until you try to save, at which point your only option is to log out, log back in, and make all of your updates once again. It can become an extreme pain point at times, and I personally have just gotten into the habit of saving every couple of minutes to avoid a massive loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    • Visibility of the personalization algorithm.
    • Exposing detailed analytics within the customer-facing dashboard.
    • "Top searches" available via API.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Coveo
    • It would be great if Coveo 6 allowed you to rebuild indexes from a certain subtree instead of needing to rebuild the entire tree to see changes. This functionality was added in Coveo 7 and is very useful.
    • In Coveo 6, integration with Sitecore is more difficult than one would expect. This integration is much improved in Coveo 7.
    • I have seen cases where an exception thrown when crawling a specific document will cause the indexing to stop completely. I believe this only happens in implementations using custom faceting but it could be handled more efficiently if the trouble document was skipped and the indexing could continue.
    • Relevancy ranking editor is good but not as powerful as GSA. GSA offers a self-learning scorer which automatically analyzes user behavior and the specific links that users click on for specific queries to fine tune relevance and scoring.
    • We've ran into issues on multiple clients with Sitecore items being indexed multiple times in Sitecore 7 and Coveo 7. The fix Coveo suggested was to upgrade our Sitecore version and Coveo but unfortunately this didn't resolve our issue. After months of testing we were finally able to resolve this by implementing our own CoveoItemCrawler to get around the issue (based on https://developers.coveo.com/display/public/SC201404/Items+in+the+Same+Language+Gets+Indexed+Multiple+Times;jsessionid=3C1A2AE33540E0A0B8BB52BA3A64AF70).
    • Integration with RabbitMQ in Coveo 7 seems error prone. We often see the error "The AMQP operation was interrupted" and on occasion, need to restart the Coveo service to get this operating again. In some extreme cases, we have also had to restart the server because of issues when attempting to restart the Coveo service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Adobe
    We have a team of people trained on how to use the application and it integrates well with the other Adobe products we use. Our future roadmap of testing will require some complex scenarios which we hope Target will be able to accomplish
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    This question is not applicable to me
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Adobe
    The recent UI update is a complete mess. It is difficult to navigate and find features that previously existed. The reactiveness of the page depending on window size is also ridiculous and it is absurd that depending on how large your window is, entire columns of functions will disappear with no indication that they are missing. The usability of the tool has fallen off a cliff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Adobe
    i don't think we use the full functionalities of the tool, but to use the full functions, it's almost impossible (Too hard)
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Adobe
    The bottleneck is never the software program
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Adobe
    On several occasions, we have had the need to ask for help from the Adobe Target support team, and I must say that they have provided us with an excellent experience, as they take care of solving the problems quickly and with high precision
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Adobe
    The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Adobe
    The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Adobe
    Implement using a global mBox on the page so you can change any and everything over the traditional method. Traditional method is good if you do not have technical web dev resources, do not know Javascript/jQuery, or you have money to blow on mBox calls. Global deployment reduces mBox calls and allows you to touch many parts of the page easily. A lot more customizable
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Adobe
    We seriously considered another software but because we use so many other Adobe products this made the most sense for us. If you are not dependent on other Adobe software and are a smaller company, in my opinion, Target may not be the best fit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Adobe
    • We have been able to run specific A/B tests that have shown an increase in conversion, which in turn has led to very large banked sales numbers for the year.
    • We have been able to prove that using and automated Merchandising process did not decrease conversion. This allowed us to greatly increase efficiency by opening up resource time.
    Read full review
    Constructor.io Corporation
    No answers on this topic
    Coveo
    • Quick to find things in a massive database when needed.
    • Results need to be more concise - sometimes we spend more time looking for the right file than if we were to just search amongst our own networks instead.
    • Coveo is not always the most useful but does its job when general information is needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots