The WorkForce Suite, by WorkForce Software, is a mobile-first, cloud-based modern workforce management solution with integrated employee communications and collaboration capabilities. The WorkForce Suite aims to help global enterprise organizations optimize their labor, protect against compliance risks, and maximize productivity while building a highly engaged, resilient, and agile workforce.
N/A
Engagedly
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Engagedly is a cloud-based talent management platform that unifies performance, engagement, learning, growth, and recognition into a single connected experience. With Marissa, its Agentic AI agent, Engagedly aims to turn strategic intent into intelligent actions. Organizations can also use Engagedly to boost engagement, improve retention, and develop high performing teams. Founded in 2015, Engagedly is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
$8,500
per year per installation
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Halogen Software offered the TalentSpace talent management solution which was acquired by Saba in 2017 and that is no longer for sale.
N/A
Pricing
ADP WorkForce Suite
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ADP WorkForce Suite
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$1,000 one-time fee per installation (starting cost)
Required
Additional Details
—
Pricing is customized based on the suite/modules implemented and the size of the organization
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ADP WorkForce Suite
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Features
ADP WorkForce Suite
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
ADP WorkForce Suite
-
Ratings
Engagedly
8.1
16 Ratings
10% above category average
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
5.1
33 Ratings
36% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.715 Ratings
3.528 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
7.713 Ratings
3.628 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
7.232 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
4.929 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
9.015 Ratings
6.432 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
ADP WorkForce Suite
-
Ratings
Engagedly
8.0
16 Ratings
15% above category average
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
6.1
32 Ratings
12% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
9.015 Ratings
4.628 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
7.315 Ratings
6.012 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
6.713 Ratings
3.625 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.714 Ratings
5.430 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
7.85 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.315 Ratings
6.332 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
7.024 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
3.130 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
ADP WorkForce Suite
-
Ratings
Engagedly
-
Ratings
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
7.8
8 Ratings
7% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.68 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
EmpCenter is really well suited for companies with minimal variety in time keeping needs. Certainly somewhere that has fairly regular work schedules and operational needs the system would be programmed for and meet those needs quite well. I think they assert themselves as a product specifically for those more complex companies, and I believe it is one of a few products available for companies with many employee types and complex work schedule and pay needs, but because of those complexities each have their own specific customizations I feel it is difficult for the company to then manage the different products that end up existing. Each ends up being unique so applying large scale changes doesn't work well as something we may request and need if applied over EmpCenter in general may cause problems for another company. Therefore everything has to be done on an individual basis and is more time consuming and costly.
Engagedly has a huge range of possibilities and we chose it because of all the functionalities it offers. I'm not marking my rating a 9 or 10 because of the UI. If you're an active user (e.g. in the people department) then you get used to the UI fast enough. However, if you only use it twice per year (like all our other users) it can be difficult to find what you need. That being said, Engagedly offers a truly broad range of HR-related functionalities and we're very happy about that!
I think it's a good platform for tracking and monitoring goals, feedback, and development. We don't use the 1:1 meeting feature, however, I can see how that would be valuable for many organizations. I do like that it is very customizable, however, that also presents problems in that sometimes forms and/or processes can be a bit challenging to create easily and quickly.
works well with other systems. We were able to collect data from another time system, Avaya phone systems and even a point of sale system with not a lot of difficulty.
They know their product and integration points. They were able to troubleshoot problems with hardware time collection devices quite quickly. We found the devices they sold to be quite durable.
Out of the box they have more reports than I would have anticipated. Creating new reports was sometimes a task if it was complex but there were usually similar reports you could use as a starter template
1:1 agendas are easy to create, add comments to and prompt excellent conversation flow on the topics that truly matter to the manager and the employee.
The system can be easily customized to reflect your company's language and culture. We did this in several areas of the platform (goals, development, learning), and it made a world of difference in the understanding and adaptation of our users. One example is that in each learning module, we added 3 questions in the course description so that managers would be automatically prompted to ask to follow up / learning transfer questions when their employees enroll and take a learning course.
Halogen support is outstanding. Any question I have had has been answered upon the first contact or within 24 hours.
My organization does not use all of the functions/modules that Halogen offers, but I find that those modules still appear on the Halogen main page. I think a great area for improvement is to hide these functions so as not to confuse employees.
After spending close to 5 years to decide on which payroll product to acquire for our University, I cannot image we would switch now that we have it in use.
Implementing a new system and process company wide is never an easy task. We moved so quickly in such a short period of time that we were able to learn quickly but also have the opportunity to improve the Halogen experience. We will more than likely will renew our use of Halogen as we already are seeing a small impact which hopefully in the long run will lead to a greater impact
The amount of features available is a lot, but they are hard to navigate due to the UI not being on par with them. Still if used properly, Engagedly is useful to keep track of multiple individuals and their personal goals.
Halogen is very intuitive and provides very clean work-space ... lots of white space and modern layouts. There is more than one way to accomplish your action, too!
Absolutely! We love engagedly because we haven't faced any kind of lagging or such issues in website. It also has a convenient app through which you can access everything. They are very polite and address to each and every query relating to software which may cause hinderence in the process.
We only purchased the appraisal module and without the other modules offered, you are really limited in what you can do and the process becomes much more involved with needing to maintain information across multiple platforms. We found that they charge for everything and call it "consulting." We poured so much money and time into a system that was just overkill for what we really needed.
EmpCenter is a new software to the company however, I only trained on the old software for a few months before EmpCenter was introduced. I think EmpCenter has a smoother data entry process and can run more in depth reports, but since this is the system I know best I cannot accurately compare it to previous software.
We used SharePoint Forms to make customized forms for ourselves but it did not work well. Our IT needed to build a system from scratch with a help of an external developer team and they were simply not capable of creating something that complicated. Engagedly already has a great platform and it was a life saver for us that we can just start using after the streamlined implementation period for a brief period of time. With SharePoint, we kept having weekly meetings for over 1.5 years to fix bugs, add necessary functions, etc. after the implementation.
I have used other systems in the past and I like that Halogen provides everything in one space. I would like to see a more developed way to report training, not in the LMS, but I think that for the most part that Halogen is a robust system that is superior to its competition.
EmpCenter has reduced the amount of time administrators are spending on payroll. Certainly it has made our entry to our pay system more efficient since we can simply load the data from the time keeping system and we are not collecting actual physical signatures and paper timesheets that must be reviewed for accuracy and completeness. The system does this for us and some automatic calculating of certain pay due that we were hand adding. However the feedback I am getting is that the supervisors feel their work has been increased greatly. They are spending more time correcting and approving time. Essentially the work we were doing in our central offices to review and correct time the supervisor must now do as they approve the time. We have now asked them to be more responsible for proper reporting and use which requires they know more about the rules and many different aspects of pay than they had before. We have employees who are union represented and get some benefits from the contract others do not receive, contract employees who have certain pay aspects in their contracts that must be known, as well as temporary employees and students who get very different pay from the other employees. While some things have been programmed for the system to know and handle, some things must be added to the time sheet to pay properly or the way time is reported is different (some clock out for lunch some don't) supervisors must now know these differences while that used to be a role that was more mine as an administrator. Now I just help them and audit and review.
We haven't used it long enough to calculate ROI (YET), but - we've had EEs who never engaged with performance management before who are excited to use the program
It has already provided a better framework to set up goals for our teams
Neg impact - limited feed of info from HRIS - requires some manual data to uploaded.
We are able to get our reviews done in a quicker amount of time. Instead of 4-8 weeks we were able to get it done under a month.
Halogen has gotten better at given us a heads up when the system will be down. Most patches are done overnight so we can at least verify it was done, but their success rate of a patch not breaking something is not at 99%. So we do lose productivity when the system is down.
The tool is easier to do so there are fewer questions from users outside the core team.