Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon WorkDocs
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Amazon WorkDocs is a document sharing and content collaboration platform. It can be used to Migrate existing content from legacy network file shares and on-premises enterprise content management (ECM) systems to the cloud, or connect internal and external teams in a secure platform. Files sync automatically and can be accessed online or offline. Integrations bring WorkDocs into existing workflows.
$5
per month per user (1 TB of storage included)
Confluence
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$6.40
per month per user
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Pricing
Amazon WorkDocsAtlassian ConfluenceTungsten Capture
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon WorkDocsConfluenceTungsten Capture
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon WorkDocsAtlassian ConfluenceTungsten Capture
Considered Multiple Products
Amazon WorkDocs

No answer on this topic

Confluence

No answer on this topic

Tungsten Capture
Chose Tungsten Capture
Kofax Capture was less expensive than the IBM product and was easier to use than both IBM and Amazon in my opinion. The unlimited scripting of Kofax Capture allowed us to fully integrate the tool into our business processes to improve our automation and reduce errors. We …
Features
Amazon WorkDocsAtlassian ConfluenceTungsten Capture
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon WorkDocs
-
Ratings
Atlassian Confluence
7.0
157 Ratings
11% below category average
Tungsten Capture
-
Ratings
Task Management00 Ratings7.1125 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.912 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings7.221 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings6.389 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings6.7116 Ratings00 Ratings
Search00 Ratings6.8155 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings7.2126 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Amazon WorkDocs
-
Ratings
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
157 Ratings
1% below category average
Tungsten Capture
-
Ratings
Chat00 Ratings6.415 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings8.2154 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings7.7147 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings9.0148 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings9.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings9.610 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Amazon WorkDocs
-
Ratings
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
156 Ratings
4% below category average
Tungsten Capture
-
Ratings
Versioning00 Ratings8.2135 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings6.8104 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings6.896 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings8.3151 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.6146 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings8.3113 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings5.947 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings8.384 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon WorkDocsAtlassian ConfluenceTungsten Capture
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Tungsten Capture
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon WorkDocsAtlassian ConfluenceTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(173 ratings)
9.2
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(21 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(61 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.4
(25 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon WorkDocsAtlassian ConfluenceTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
I would recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies that want to have internal documentation and minimum governance processes to ensure documentation is useful and doesn't have a lot of duplicated and non-updated content. I wouldn't recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies with a low budget since this product might be a little costly (especially with add-ons).
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
  • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
  • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
  • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
  • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
  • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
  • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
  • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
  • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
  • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
  • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
Great for organizing knowledge in a hierarchical format. Seamless for engineering and product teams managing software development. Helps in formatting pages effectively, reducing manual work. Tracks changes well and allows for easy rollbacks. Granular controls for who can view/edit pages. Search function is not great which needs improvement. Hire some google engineers
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
It's good.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Performance
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Quality of data capture. Automatic data integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic image integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic invoice booking in Oracle and SAP ERP.
Read full review
Scalability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Atlassian
  • The AI feature which lets me find relevant documents while reading one document is really beneficial.
  • Centralising of knowledge systems is one of the key differentiators for large organisations.
  • As long as folks keep using Google Docs and Atlassian Confluence, there is going to be a challenge in building a continuum.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
ScreenShots