Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluence
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$6.40
per month per user
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing.
$14
per month per user
QlikView
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
QlikView® is Qlik®’s original BI offering designed primarily for shared business intelligence reports and data visualizations. It offers guided exploration and discovery, collaborative analytics for sharing insight, and agile development and deployment.N/A
Pricing
Atlassian ConfluenceMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Power BI Pro
$14
per month per user
Power BI Premium
$24
per month per user
QlikView
Custom
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluenceMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Free Trial
YesNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.On an perpetual license basis, based on server plus number of users. Contact vendor for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian ConfluenceMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Considered Multiple Products
Confluence
Chose Atlassian Confluence
Other products evaluated: SharePoint, corporate-WIKI.
SharePoint has a clunky user interface, and the resulting websites look poor. It resulted in low acceptance from our users. WIKI was over-simplistic and had a lousy search engine. Confluence was selected because of its great …
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Specific data displays are some of the strongest aspects of Microsoft BI when compared to alternate programs. It also does a superior job in compatibility with many programs, especially those from Microsoft. Since my company primarily uses Office 365 and other Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
The software stacks [well] because it has more graphics resolution and the colors are fresh and actualized. On the other hand, there is the Microsoft family software and this is an advantage. Microsoft has a lot of users around the world and it's like everyone knows how to do …
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
One of the main reasons Microsoft BI was chosen by our company is because it is a reliable program. We tried different programs in the past (and currently also use other ones for certain reporting and analysis needs) but Microsoft BI was the least buggy out of our top choices.
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Looking at the visualization portion of BI, there are three types of tools.
  1. Programming packages. Free and powerful, they let you make any diagram, at the cost of difficulty of use.
  2. Specialist software like Tableau and Microsoft BI. This is the best choice in most cases due to …
QlikView
Chose QlikView
I was forced into QV by QuickBooks -- I did not have the opportunity to evaluate it specifically against other packages.
I have, however, seen Microsoft BI and BIRST --- both of which seem much more expensive (and perhaps complex) than QlikView. But I'm conjecturing a bit here.
Features
Atlassian ConfluenceMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.0
157 Ratings
11% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
QlikView
-
Ratings
Task Management7.1125 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.912 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.221 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.389 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.7116 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Search6.8155 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.2126 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
157 Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
QlikView
-
Ratings
Chat6.415 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.2154 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions7.7147 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.015 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.0148 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.37 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.610 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
156 Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
QlikView
-
Ratings
Versioning8.2135 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files6.8104 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.896 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.3151 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.6146 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.3113 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.947 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.384 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.0
53 Ratings
9% above category average
QlikView
8.5
68 Ratings
4% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.646 Ratings8.050 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.653 Ratings9.466 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.051 Ratings8.060 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.6
53 Ratings
7% above category average
QlikView
8.1
67 Ratings
1% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.648 Ratings8.366 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.353 Ratings7.767 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings8.442 Ratings8.336 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.053 Ratings8.262 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.6
52 Ratings
5% above category average
QlikView
8.6
62 Ratings
5% above category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings9.448 Ratings8.049 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.248 Ratings9.056 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.544 Ratings7.542 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.647 Ratings10.048 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.626 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.8
52 Ratings
10% above category average
QlikView
7.4
58 Ratings
8% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.651 Ratings7.955 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.848 Ratings7.546 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.945 Ratings6.85 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.3
53 Ratings
9% above category average
QlikView
6.9
60 Ratings
21% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.549 Ratings8.159 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.447 Ratings5.655 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.049 Ratings5.955 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings9.46 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.1
42 Ratings
4% above category average
QlikView
8.0
47 Ratings
3% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.239 Ratings8.044 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings8.030 Ratings9.028 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.939 Ratings8.038 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.6
24 Ratings
11% above category average
QlikView
-
Ratings
REST API00 Ratings9.321 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.921 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings8.920 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings8.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings8.221 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings7.519 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian ConfluenceMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian ConfluenceMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(173 ratings)
10.0
(73 ratings)
7.7
(88 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(21 ratings)
8.0
(25 ratings)
8.8
(29 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(61 ratings)
10.0
(15 ratings)
8.0
(15 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
9.8
(4 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(5 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
5.4
(25 ratings)
8.9
(15 ratings)
3.3
(15 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(4 ratings)
9.6
(7 ratings)
7.4
(13 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian ConfluenceMicrosoft BI (MSBI)QlikView
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
I would recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies that want to have internal documentation and minimum governance processes to ensure documentation is useful and doesn't have a lot of duplicated and non-updated content. I wouldn't recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies with a low budget since this product might be a little costly (especially with add-ons).
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft BI has a lot of features and is a very powerful tool, especially if you have folks on your team that know how to utilize all of its capabilities. To truly unlock all that it can do, it does require people to have a deep understanding of its capabilities. That's where the software really shines. If you are looking for a simpler, more basic reporting tool, there are other programs available that do not require such a steep learning curve.
Read full review
Qlik
Sales data validations have helped manage our justifications in the past, especially with regard to new product development and new business introduction. It has also been helpful in identifying trends with business impact and direction specific to quarter and monthly sales from ERP data as well as decisions to purchase equipment of staffing based on run rates and product demand.
One thing that can get out of hand is data output - if you aren't careful in your query, you may be overloaded with data dumps and drown in the amount of info you have to filter through. This is a user caution, not a comment on the software itself.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
  • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
  • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Comparatively easy to use compared to other data analytics solutions, collaborating with other colleagues on data work is simple.
  • Using Visual Studio for database, ETL, reporting, and analytics development save time and money.
  • Transfer of data from one application to another via Excel and comparison of data attributes between applications
  • Dashboard functionality, as well as Python support, are available, allowing you to add additional charts and graphs.
Read full review
Qlik
  • QlikView has a simple, relational data model that's REALLY fast. Filtering and changing data is dead simple results are almost immediately available.
  • The free version of Qlikview is almost completely featured, so you roll a pro-level product out to an entire department for really cheap.
  • QlikView is really flexible--if you can imagine it, you can build it.
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
  • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
  • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • MSBI designs can work on increasing data processing capabilities enough to handle the huge datasets etc.
  • It would be a lot better if it is a little low on cost.
  • it needs to create opportunities little more than they do regarding customization of some very unique visualization effects
Read full review
Qlik
  • We found that QlikView can be a bit slow in supporting some forms of encryption. It is web-based and we needed to upgrade all of our server to not support the older SSL and TLS 1 protocols, only support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. However, QlikView could not run with TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. We had to wait over six months to get a version that would handle the newer TLS versions.
  • There are so many options with QlikView that you can get lost when developing a visualization. There are still items I have not yet figured out, such as labeling a graph with the name of a selected detail item.
  • QlikView works by pulling the data it is going to use for visualization into its database. I am a security reviewer and I need to make certain that PII and PHI is not pulled by QlikView for a visualization, otherwise this could become a reportable indecent.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft BI is fundamental to our suite of BI applications. That being said, Northcraft Analytics is focused on delighting our customers, so if the underlying factors of our decision change, we would choose to re-write our BI applications on a different stack. Luckily, mathematics are the fundamental IP of our technology... and is portable across all BI platforms for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Qlik
Ease of use, ability to load from pretty much any data source. today I created an application that loaded time sheets from excel that are not in a table format. With Qlik's "enable transformation steps" I was able to automate loads of multiple spreadsheets and multiple tabs easily. Could not do that with any other tool.
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
Great for organizing knowledge in a hierarchical format. Seamless for engineering and product teams managing software development. Helps in formatting pages effectively, reducing manual work. Tracks changes well and allows for easy rollbacks. Granular controls for who can view/edit pages. Search function is not great which needs improvement. Hire some google engineers
Read full review
Microsoft
The Microsoft BI tools have great usability for both developers and end users alike. For developers familiar with Visual Studio, there is little learning curve. For those not, the single Visual Studio IDE means not having to learn separate tools for each component. For end-users, the web interface for SSRS is simple to navigate with intuitive controls. For ad-hoc analysis, Excel can connect directly to SSAS and provide a pivot table like experience which is familiar to many users. For database development, there is beginning to be some confusion, as there are now three tool choices (VS, SSMS, Azure Data Studio) for developers. I would like to see Azure Data Studio become the superset of SSMS and eventually supplant it.
Read full review
Qlik
QlikView is very easy to implement. The installation is very straight forward. QlikView has several different data connectors that can connect to different data sources very smoothly. The user interface to build the reports is very easy to understand. This helps to have a smaller learning curve. Something very helpful is that QlikView is a browser application for the end users. So, you don't need to install any applications on the user's computer.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Atlassian
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
Microsoft
The product has been reliable.
Read full review
Qlik
We have not had any downtime issues with the product nor uncovered any significant bugs
Read full review
Performance
Atlassian
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
Microsoft
SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) can drag at times. We created two report servers and placed them under an F5 load balancer. This configuration has worked well. We have seen sluggish performance at times due to the Windows Firewall.
Read full review
Qlik
It is not a SAAS product.
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
Microsoft
MSBI natively has a site that allows you to vote on user enhancements and bug fixes. This allows the largest nagging issues to float to the top and the development team can prioritize accordingly. As mentioned earlier, the large community base of MSBI developers assist technical resources in handling technical questions.
Read full review
Qlik
My experience with the Qlik support team has been somewhat limited, but every interaction I have had with them has been very professional and I received a response quickly. Typically if there is a technical issue, our IT team will follow up. My inquiries are specific to product functionality, and Qlik has been very helpful in clarifying any questions I might have.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
This training was more directed toward what the product was capable of rather than actual programming.
Read full review
Qlik
My team attended, but I cannot myself rate, but I think it was good as they've successfully launched a training program at our company themselves for users. It was 3-4 day training.
Read full review
Online Training
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I have used on-line training from Microsoft and from Pragmatic Works. I would recommend Pragmatic Works as the best way to get up to speed quickly, and then use the Microsoft on-line training to deep dive into specific features that you need to get depth with.
Read full review
Qlik
Training was as expected. The demo environments tend to be more fully featured that our own environment, but the training was clear and well delivered.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
Microsoft
We are a consulting firm and as such our best resources are always billing on client projects. Our internal implementation has weaknesses, but that's true for any company like ours. My rating is based on the product's ease of implementation.
Read full review
Qlik
"Implementation" can mean a few things... so I'm not sure that this is the answer you want.... but here it goes: To me, implementation means: "Is the user interface intuitive and can I produce meaningful reports with ease?" On that score, I'd say YES. The amount of training required was minimal and the results were powerful. The desktop implementation is a simple, "blank" interface just waiting for your creativity. The pre-populated templates give you a reasonable start to any project -- and a good set of objects to "play around with" if you're just getting started. Finally, note that the "implementation" I used was baked into QuickBooks 2016 Enterprise -- called "Advanced Reporting"..... That integration makes it ultra useful and simple.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
Read full review
Microsoft
We have used the built in ConnectWise Manager reports and custom reports. The reports provide static data. PowerBI shows us live data we can drill down into and easily adjust parameters. It's much more useful than a static PDF report.
Read full review
Qlik
The only other vendor product that I have worked with that provides a similar experience to Qlikview is Tableau. I would recommend Tableau if your use case is to build a fixed dashboard. You can share reports for free without needing to buy additional licenses. I would recommend Qlikview if your users are looking for a more interactive experience. They can create new objects to represent the data which can't be accomplished as easily in Tableau
Read full review
Scalability
Atlassian
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Qlik
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • The AI feature which lets me find relevant documents while reading one document is really beneficial.
  • Centralising of knowledge systems is one of the key differentiators for large organisations.
  • As long as folks keep using Google Docs and Atlassian Confluence, there is going to be a challenge in building a continuum.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • As a SaaS provider we see being able to provide self-service BI to our client users as a competitive advantage. In fact the MSSQL enabled BI is a contributing factor to many winning RFPs we have done for prospective client organisations.
  • However MSSQL BI requires extensive knowledge and skills to design and develop data warehouses & data models as a foundation to support business analysts and users to interrogate data effectively and efficiently. Often times we find having strong in-house MSSQL expertise is a bless.
Read full review
Qlik
  • You can use the free desktop version to do a lot of reporting and analysis work more quickly so the ROI is huge
  • QlikView is great at finding outliers such as data entry errors
  • QlikView is great at helping you quickly discover new insights about your business that can prompt you to take action that can immediately affect your cash flow.
Read full review
ScreenShots

QlikView Screenshots

Screenshot of QlikView Sales DashboardScreenshot of QlikView on all devicesScreenshot of QlikView using mobile touch screen