TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Automox

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Automox

Connect with Automox

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Automox so that Automox and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Automox

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AAutomox is an endpoint management platform built for the era of autonomous operations. It provides a cloud-native foundation that unifies automation, speed, visibility, and trust.

    $1

    per month per endpoint

    Lookout

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ALookout, from the San Francisco-based company of the same name, is a platform offering mobile endpoint security.

    $2.99

    Per Device Per Month

    Microsoft Intune

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Intune (formerly Microsoft Endpoint Manager), combining the capabilities of the former Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager, SCCM or ConfigMgr, is presented as a unified endpoint management option. Microsoft Intune is an endpoint management solution for mobile devices, an MDM solution that allows the user to securely manage iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS devices with a single endpoint management solution. The component Endpoint Configuration Manager (the…

    $5

    per user/per month

    Pricing
    AutomoxLookoutMicrosoft Intune
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Premium
    $2.99
    Per Device Per Month
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $5
    per user/per month
    Microsoft 365 For Individuals
    $6.99
    per month
    Microsoft 365 Apps
    $8.25
    per user/per month
    Microsoft 365 For Families
    $9.99
    per month
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $12.50
    per user/per month
    Microsoft 365 Business Premium
    $15
    per user/per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AutomoxLookoutMicrosoft Intune
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AutomoxLookoutMicrosoft Intune
    Considered Multiple Products
    Automox
    Chose Automox
    We have also used/evaluated Microsoft Intune; it is useful for device management, but we found Automox easier for patch management and third-party updates. Automox is easy to navigate and helps us automate updates with less manual work. We selected Automox because it was a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    We chose this tool over Automox because, before Automox, we used Intune, and at the time we were on Office 365, so Intune was almost free. Later, the board decided to move from the Microsoft 365 suite to Google Workspace, and Intune's endpoint management costs were high, so we …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    I used it in another company, and it was good. But I personally prefer Automox's endpoint management system, as it is easy to navigate and has better patch management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool compared to the others we evaluated. The POC and deployment process were smooth, and pricing was competitive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    I have used Tenable Patch Management, but the reason I did not go with it is because it uses on prem servers that we have to host instead of using Agent and cloud platform like Automox.

    I feel like that is dated as most solutions are now changing into the cloud solutions.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    We chose Automox for it's clean/easy to use UI, remote control capabilities, and automation/patching. The balance of effectiveness and cost made it the best choice for our org
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox has a could based console and platform which can cater the computers outside the network. It's not possible in Lan Guard. Also Automox support cross platform and have a very big 3rd party application support than intune. So better to go with Automox
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Cloud-based solution with no need for on-prem infrastructure. Support Windows, macOS, Linux, and third-party applications. Cost-effective solution compared with other vendors.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Compared to these solutions, Automox outranks them as the Automox is highly personalized for different types of device types. It supports Windows, Linux, and macOS devices very effectively. Other products are also support other types of devices, but not this much of control can …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    AutoMox is the first product I have tried for app updates, and I don't think I need to try any others.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox performs a lot better, with better reliability
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    In my experience, Kaseya really lacked reporting of any kind and seemed clunky. Although we were on the on-prem version, not their cloud version, in my experience, their support was less than helpful and more interested in cold-call selling rather than helping me solve problems …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Not used any other products to compare against!
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    I think Automox far exceeds N-able in every category. More intuitive, less expensive, etc. Just a much better platform and more user friendly.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox lets us control so much more and makes it incredibly easy to target very specific devices for very specific actions. it is also incredibly reliable and I know it will patch as expected with very minimal monitoring. Automox has been the most stable of all the tools I …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox blows Intune out of the water in terms of app patching. I don't know why Microsoft doesn't spend money on making pushing patches easy with Intune, but that creates an opportunity for others I guess? If you've ever worked with Intune you know what I'm talking about. If …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox is much easier to handle and has much better usability then Intune. Intune is difficult to use and did not offer what Automox offers.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox is better at patching applications such as browsers or Adobe than Intune. Intune, however, has better reporting and a more robust catalog of device management capabilities. We use both in our environment and utilize each of their strengths, as mentioned above. At the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    From a pricing perspective, Automox is very competitive when compared to others with similar feature sets and capabilities. Other solutions from larger vendors were somewhat limited in their visibility, operating system support, and third-party application integration. Automox …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Automox has a larger list of 3rd party software that is available. In my experience, Automox does not allow you to browse software looking for updates to apply. In my opinion, the reporting of automox sucks comparatively.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Better 3rd party patching and reporting.
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    Special thing about Automox is that it has customer deploy packages for many remote end points where as other tools listed does not have that privileges. Other tools are not user interface friendly where as Automox user interface is very easy and customizable as well. Unique …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    We stoppped using PDQ because it required our users to connect to the corporate VPN. It might take months for some remote users to receive a patch, and often we would have to schedule time with them one-on-one to ensure that it got done. With Automox, we don't have to do any …
    Incentivized
    Chose Automox
    I've used a number of other patching products at previous employers. Automox, while it does not have all the bells and whistles of SCCM, Tanium, or BigFix such as software self service or automated deployment through network scanning, software catalogs, or warranty check …
    Incentivized
    Lookout
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    157 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    148 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    154 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    120 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    144 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    19 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    AutomoxLookoutMicrosoft Intune
    Small Businesses
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Action1
    Score9.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Action1
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AutomoxLookoutMicrosoft Intune
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (165 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    8.7
    (53 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.3
    (131 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.4
    (12 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.9
    (14 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (10 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (14 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AutomoxLookoutMicrosoft Intune
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Automox
    Automox is useful when manual patching becomes daunting. For large companies, it's unrealistic to spend significant time manually patching each endpoint. IT teams gain flexibility, and Automox saves significant time that can be dedicated to more important projects. Automox helps maintain a strong security posture.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    Lookout is excellent for mobile device security. I'd recommend it to anyone looking for a simple solution to guarantee peace of mind when keeping mobile devices secure. It's also excellent for finding a device that's been lost remotely, including an excellent feature for enabling audio on a device when it was put in silent mode locally. The web UI is easy to use and allows for powerful functionality through a simple interface. Lastly, it is an excellent secondary backup solution. I'd recommend having other potential backup solutions as well in case this premium feature ever expires and you aren't sure whether you have a most recent contact backup within Lookout.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Intune is well suited for the larger end of the small business segment to the enterprise. The ability to configure and remotely deploy computer configurations, control mobile devices, and fine tune security controls of each device or device group is a major win for this product. Smaller and mid-sized businesses may balk at having to increase their license level to unlock the better updating features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Automox
    • Shows applications installed on a specific asset
    • Able to push policies and updates remotely , creating policies is easy.
    • Keep track of compliant devices and when is the last time they have connected to the servers
    • All the great information provided within one single device
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    • It emits alerts before any vulnerability found, thus avoiding damages.
    • It has a very simple interface so it is easy to use.
    • It allows the protection against vulnerabilities as well as the backup of information and search before the loss of the mobile or theft.
    • It runs in the background so it does not interrupt any activity.
    • Its access is very flexible since only the internet is required to access through the application or web.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • [Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM)] helps to speed up the deployment of patches/software throughout our environment. I can easily build a package and then deploy across all endpoints.
    • The ability to supercede software is also quite handy. This automates the removal of old versions and replacing them with newer versions.
    • The Intune Autopilot option is very useful if you want to deploy software to devices straight out of the box. You can configure them to download software when a user opens a new PC and turns it on for the first time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Automox
    • There are some applications that updates to the wrong version causing Channel version issues, this then needs to be excluded from the policy and updated via a script.
    • Certain software like NET. is not updated
    • The worklet / remediation / evaluation system is not always effective, does not work all the time. Needs to be very detailed for it work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    • They're the global, mobile cyber experts we trust. They're ahead of the curve already. All I could suggest is, keep going in that direction.
    • Perhaps, send out an occasional , brief update on global trends that business executives should be aware of, even when Lookout is already on it.
    • Keep it brief, with a case study where a proactive action was taken and an event was avoided. Those would be shared enterprise-wide.
    • More PR about your proactive actions would be educational for us all. NO FUD, will ever work, but seeing that there are actions we can take, even to the newest of threats will be very effective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Deploying more apps besides Microsoft Edge and Microsoft Office 365 app
    • Microsoft needs to make it easier to deploy exe, pkg, and msi apps without having to go through the manual process of re-packaging these apps using tools from github like intuneapputil
    • Add a feature to push out software updates for 3rd party apps
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Automox
    We really like Automox and have had a very positive experience using the platform. It has made managing and supporting our environment significantly easier, while giving us the visibility and control we need to manage devices effectively. It has simplified a number of operational tasks for our team, and we are very happy with the value and capabilities it provides.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Mascom Wireless is a Microsoft shop and SCCM has proved to be helpful in keeping our Microsoft products up to date every month without fail. We also have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement which we renewed for three years ending 2022. The remote access utility works wonders for the organisation and have saved travel bills including subsistance allowance. We have been able to fulfill security audits both internal and external. We have been able to keep a robust inventory of our computer assets and nothing falls of the cracks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Automox
    I love the console interface; it makes taking action very simple compared to some other software I've used. There's a wealth of information at your fingertips on a user's endpoint page in Automox, and it's usually the only tool I need when troubleshooting, unless something more specific is going on.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    I have never had any issue using the application since the UI and settings are laid out in an easy to follow way.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The console is not intuitive and does not work well often. Due to the complexity of the product, documentation can be confusing. When properly configured, routine tasks like OS deployment, remote control, and software deployment are easy to do. Troubleshooting of System Center Configuration Manager issues is hard, as there are various logs, and their content can be hard to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Automox
    No answers on this topic
    Lookout
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It's a 'heavy' system, which demands a lot of resources form the datacenter perspective. So, make sure you followed the requirements to avoid frustration in the future. From the 'client' perspective, it's fine. I've never had any issue with that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Automox
    I did not need to reach out to support often but when I did the answers were relatively correct and they were answered quickly. The only thing I might "ding" their support on was their lack of understanding of OS's different from Windows and especially Linux. Other than that I was satisfied
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    We have not needed to seek support for this product in the time that we have used it thus far. It's been working really well, and have not had any major issues. Being that it's a Microsoft product, it goes without saying that there will be many support options available if needed. This includes phone, web, forums, KB articles, etc. There is even comprehensive documentation that is available on the web through Microsoft's website for use of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Automox
    Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Work with a "test group" of users who you have a good relationship with so that when things don't work properly they understand! Work with your partner nicely without forcing things especially timelines as you are bound to make mistakes and create oversights in the project Management can also interfere with the implementation (which can cause delays) if you make too many mistakes which takes me back to having a "test group" where you have good relations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Automox
    We chose this tool over Automox because, before Automox, we used Intune, and at the time we were on Office 365, so Intune was almost free. Later, the board decided to move from the Microsoft 365 suite to Google Workspace, and Intune's endpoint management costs were high, so we moved to Automox.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    Lookout was chosen by T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T which many employees have chosen as their mobile network provider. From that standpoint, it made it a simple decision. Its cloud based technology gives insight across almost all mobile code in the world. Lookout identifies connections that would otherwise go unseen without deep investigation. It helps prevent cybercriminals from sneaking into mobile devices and that's the key component for any mobile security solution. MobileIron and other competitor solutions have a similar offering, but based on network provider support I haven't need to look into the competition extensively.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We did not evaluate or use other products like Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM). The main reason we did not evaluate or use other products is because Microsoft Endpoint Manager (Microsoft Intune + SCCM) integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and Windows PCs. Expenses would have increased as well if we had purchased another similar product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Automox
    • We wanted to like the remote support software, but the experience was poor compared to a solution like BeyondTrust.
    • Development and deployment of worklets is fast for experienced coders.
    • Policy execution and reporting is fast and reliable.
    • The new analytics dashboard excels at reporting Mean Time to Remediation for executive reporting purposes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Lookout
    • Security is often hard to translate into ROI terms. However, having an option to locate a device does mitigate a possible large expense in fines or other issues with loss of data.
    • Minimal cost/support needs, does not significantly impact support staff. So can add support without additional costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • In our current environment, this System Center Configuration Manager had replaced several standalone solutions for patching, imaging, remote assistance, reporting, etc. That saved a lot of time and resulted in money to manage the IT infrastructure.
    • Once SCCM is deployed and fully configured, all agents are deployed and it is easy to automate a lot of processes and just control them from time to time to make sure that everything is working as supposed to be.
    • SCCM + Windows 10: great built-in endpoint protection solution. As a result, there is no need to buy additional software for that purpose.
    • The imaging process is better compared to WDS because you can modify deployment packages and apply patches to a newly imaged machine. This saves tons of time for new employees deployment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots