Automox vs. SUSE Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Automox
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Automox is an endpoint management platform built for the era of autonomous operations. It provides a cloud-native foundation that unifies automation, speed, visibility, and trust.
$1
per month per endpoint
SUSE Manager
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
German company SUSE offers SUSE Manager, a software defined infrastructure Linux server configuration management tool supporting patching, provisioning of Linux servers, and related actions.N/A
Pricing
AutomoxSUSE Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomoxSUSE Manager
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomoxSUSE Manager
Features
AutomoxSUSE Manager
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
Automox
-
Ratings
SUSE Manager
9.1
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Infrastructure Automation00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Automated Provisioning00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Parallel Execution00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Node Management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Reporting & Logging00 Ratings6.62 Ratings
Version Control00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AutomoxSUSE Manager
Small Businesses
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomoxSUSE Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(150 ratings)
10.0
(12 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(7 ratings)
9.2
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(116 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(10 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomoxSUSE Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Automox
It's excellent when it comes to patch management. We have all our patches (per OU) set up to run on different days, and get detailed reports on which patches have failed and for what reason. We've also been able to push out windows 11 via Automox too, which for a business with a lot of users, makes live so much easier
Read full review
SUSE
In our specific use case, SUSE Manager is extremely useful. We're having a large landscape that is divided into intake, development, quality and production with a couple of different SUSE flavours that need to be automatically rolled out, configured, patched and maintained, everything from up to date repositories that are cloned on a daily basis straight from SUSE.
Read full review
Pros
Automox
  • Shows applications installed on a specific asset
  • Able to push policies and updates remotely , creating policies is easy.
  • Keep track of compliant devices and when is the last time they have connected to the servers
  • All the great information provided within one single device
Read full review
SUSE
  • Manages patch levels for most Linux OS by: date, group, cloud or custom channels
  • Uses a lite version of Salt to run commands or scripts on any numbers of servers at once.
  • Allows the joining of groups inside SUSE Manager to quickly access or work with servers so grouped.
Read full review
Cons
Automox
  • Server patching orchestration. There is no way to patch and reboot systems in order of importance, such as database servers before application servers.
  • Worklets for patching .net core and similar.
  • Worklets for removing unwanted Java installs or other unwanted software.
  • Integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management.
  • AI script development should be included at no additional cost; GPT or Gemini can be used instead for free and pasted into Automox. Why charge when others are free?
  • Official worklets are slow to be added or updated.
Read full review
SUSE
  • The cloning of patches when using the content lifecycle module in a multi-environment landscape with many SLES flavours is a bit cumbersome.
  • More premade saltstate for default applications are always nice to have.
  • Upgrading SUMA could be easier, especially when a Postgres upgrade is also required.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Automox
This is a software that just works. Once configured its a set and forget kind of tool that keeps things up to date and alerts me if something is wrong. I was able to work through an expansion project to deploy an additional 500 devices in almost no time and create a robust self-patching environment.
Read full review
SUSE
I am expanding the use of SUSE Manager throughout our organization and can't imagine going back to the "wild wild west" we had before.
Read full review
Usability
Automox
The dashboard provides a quick overview of our current status regarding complaints and outstanding patches, while also enabling us to focus on high-priority and critical patching and understand why older patches remain outstanding. The reporting provides a vast amount of information, depending on the requirements. Although the analytics feature is new, there is significant potential to offer even more impactful insights.
Read full review
SUSE
The gui is extremely user friendly. The installation and configuration does have a learning curve, it takes a while to set everything up. But once you're passed this initial learning curve, everything is very intuitive. If you want extra automation, there's an api (eventough i personally find the documentation of the api could be ordered better). I gave this product a 9 because of the initial learning curve and the api documentation, but for the rest it suits my needs perfectly.
Read full review
Support Rating
Automox
I did not need to reach out to support often but when I did the answers were relatively correct and they were answered quickly. The only thing I might "ding" their support on was their lack of understanding of OS's different from Windows and especially Linux. Other than that I was satisfied
Read full review
SUSE
SUSE Manager provided a top-tier support person on site to us for two days to help integration. We did all the standard stuff they help with before he arrived. We were able to use him to get all the tricky stuff identified and solved in the short time we had. Had they sent us a lower-tier guy, it would have been a waste. I was impressed they sent such knowledgeable person.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Automox
Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
Read full review
SUSE
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Automox
While not a direct analog, we have noted that our A/V provider also handles patching. That being said, the solution is not as al la carte as Automox, and requires much more thought to implement. Automox is a favorite for its lightweight nature and it's time to implementation being measured in minutes, not hours or days.
Read full review
SUSE
The other competitors also have a good platform and service, but we went with SUSE due to cost. The price was best and we needed to keep under a certain budget. The functionality was perfect for what we needed so we took the step forward. This allows us to manage our Linux environment within the manager and update or deploy specific tasks to each as needed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Automox
  • At the base tier, it is well worth the cost and has freed up a lot of time for me to work on other tasks. That's a net gain to me.
  • Better visibility into the update status and risk certain client machines have. Then I know what clients need my attention most.
Read full review
SUSE
  • Manages patch levels for most Linux OS by: date, group, cloud or custom channels
  • Make it easy to audit our own infrastructure.
  • Allows the joining of groups inside SUSE Manager to quickly access or work with servers so grouped.
  • 24/7 support team.
  • Automatic deployment.
Read full review
ScreenShots