Axero vs. LumApps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Axero
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Axero's Communifire is an Enterprise Social and Collaboration platform. Used internally, it connects employees, key customers and partners to pursue shared goals. Used to build an online community, it puts the emphasis on working together, not just meeting socially. The platform, designed to encourage the spread and expansion of ideas is suited for organizations that want their community to not only get connected but also feel they are getting things done.N/A
LumApps
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
LumApps is an Employee Experience Platform that engages every employee with personalized communications, regardless of location, and empowers them to do their best work by connecting them with the tools, people, and information they need to get the job done. Integrations with both Microsoft and Google enables employees to share knowledge, resources, and connect with each other. The employee experience platform aligns and engages digital workplaces, and enables…N/A
Pricing
AxeroLumApps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AxeroLumApps
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsAxero tailors your investment to meet your unique needs. Custom pricing and volume discounting available. Contact Axero for details.Pricing is upon request.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AxeroLumApps
Considered Both Products
Axero
Chose Axero
I evaluated a number of platforms. Here's the list: Mango Apps, Jive, Jostle, Zyncro, Bitrix 24, Exo platform, Huddle, Confluence, Hip Chat, Wrike, Hive. Some of the other platforms were really nice but Communifire was the platform that best meet our needs.
Chose Axero
The customer service from Communifire was what initially hooked us - quick, honest and reliable. With the others mentioned above we did receive some good service, some poor service and at times virtually no service at all. As we progressed with trial accounts of each system …
Chose Axero
We selected Communifire for the excellent sales support, strong feature set and quick set up time. We were able to get started immediately and build out features as need required which led to faster execution and higher adoption rates among our team.
Chose Axero
I did an in-depth comparison of the leading 3 platforms and selected Communifire based on price for features. When I had such a positive experience with their unbelievable support, I knew we made the right decision.
Chose Axero
Provided me many options, e.g. wiki, video, cases, forums, facebook like posting, articles, blogs, file area, and the ability to create sub communities. Nobody else came close to offering these items at a fair price, package clarity, and ease of use.

Second, the 'can-do' spirit …
LumApps
Chose LumApps
It overall stacked up incredibly against all its competitors. Its customer service, simple to use format, and ease of implementation were hard to beat. We got up and running in about 6-8 months and it was right on schedule for implementation. It's feature set was smaller …
Chose LumApps
Our organization selected LumApps for its customizability, integrations with the Google suite, Slack, etc., in addition to the customizable meta-data that would allow for a unique user experience for our global teams so that users in the Latin American region, for example, …
Chose LumApps
Because we're on Google Workspace, it just made sense to use LumApps. We also use AODocs, and they all work together very well.
Chose LumApps
LumApps formatting an end-user views look much better, but Drupal is much easier to use.
Chose LumApps
We looked at several, but our parent company was using LumApps and it made the most sense to stick with them.
Chose LumApps
I was not part of the selection process. We do have teams that are using Sharepoint due to the fact that their teams use MS Teams heavily to share and collaborate. Some teams find it easier to simply build out Sharepoint pages because their Teams content already lives on …
Chose LumApps
It was not flexible enough for us and the granularity of permissions doesn’t attend us. Its a good tool but for simple sharing content.
Chose LumApps
LumApps is more fit for purpose for a collaborative intranet. Lots of features related to internal communications. However, some of the tools provided are not intuitive for people who have experience with other CMS platforms. The setup is a bit challenging, and will likely …
Chose LumApps
Sharepoint is also fairly easy to use for content creators. Sharepoint has been around for a very long time and is a powerful enterprise tool when it is well implemented, but implementation is critical to ensure that both the brand experience and usability for content owners …
Chose LumApps
LumApps certainly outperforms some of these platforms on the enterprise level due to their partnership with employee management services like Okta. That said, the content management aspect becomes more difficult because the management process feels very manual and rigid. Bulk …
Chose LumApps
LumApps is so much easier to use. With Sharepoint, you probably need a developer due to its complexity. You don't need that at all with LumApps. Marketing and HR professionals can easily learn it. It is best to lean on LumApps or a partner to build out a few templates to get …
Chose LumApps
Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams and SAP Jam
Chose LumApps
LumApps offers organizations both a data push and a data pull option. Controlling page viewership by the audience sets this tool apart from many other communication options. When organizations put in the appropriate design time effort to leverage LumApps' feature set, their …
Chose LumApps
We did not formally compare these platforms. I have worked on them with other clients.
Chose LumApps
Simpplr was the closest but we didn't think they could scale.
Chose LumApps
Google Sites is not meant to be an intranet, we were using it well beyond its intention, but it was free (and we use G Suite for everything else). We demoed Jive and Facebook for Business, but neither sufficed for an intranet that also needed to be a repository for documents, …
Chose LumApps
We previously used apps like Coda and Lessonly for user-generated content that we shared on our internal communication channels.

Coda and Google Docs work well for frequent collaboration. Lessonly works well for engaging learning content. We added in LumApps to manage content …
Chose LumApps
LumApps works with SharePoint and provides a much easier and more intuitive user interface. It is fairly simple to learn the basics, although plan to spend more time to really dive into all that it can offer and become an expert in the product. They seem very entuned to the …
Chose LumApps
We used Jive previously. From a capability standpoint, Jive was very strong. It could do a lot, and it did it mostly well. However, Jive was purchased and the company that bought them ruined the product. We would have severe downtime (sometimes for multiple days), and support …
Chose LumApps
I was not part of the team on product selection at that time.
Best Alternatives
AxeroLumApps
Small Businesses
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AxeroLumApps
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AxeroLumApps
Likelihood to Recommend
Specific scenarios where Communifire would be well suited to an organisation, would be companies that are people focused and committed to frequent and open communication channels from both the top-down and bottom-up. It also would suit organizations that are committed to providing the staff opportunities to collaborate, share and actively contribute to company initiatives and planning. If these aren't elements of your organization's culture, the system would still work for you or those companies who just want to push information out and have an effective intranet. Communifire would cater to these scenarios just as well and is more than capable of providing that type of simple solution.
Read full review
LumApps is THE employee experience platform! With its customizable meta-data, I was able to create over 700 pieces of content to deploy a regionalized user experience for our global sales and customer success teams. No longer were employees inundated with content that did not apply to their region or market. With LumApps’ best in class functionality, the integrations that our organization uses, such as Google and Slack were easily integrated within LumApps to create a seamless user experience for a global audience.
Read full review
Pros
  • Support. Support. Support. Did I say excellent support? :)
  • Flexiblity and ease of use.
  • Responsiveness of Axero Solutions with changes.
  • Ability to make changes to the platform without programming.
Read full review
  • Offers simple addition of custom content types that give the ability to apply different access and distribution levels.
  • The HTML widget allows for the simple removal of WYSIWG tools to simplify the view for content contributors.
  • The ability to rearrange layouts is very simple.
Read full review
Cons
  • You can't duplicate broadcast messages or schedule ones in advance if they've already been sent.
  • The analytics on broadcast messages is nonexistent.
  • I wish the digests had rich text.
Read full review
  • The editing user interface is a bit wonky and occasionally glitchy.
  • The back-end options are not organized super well, which can make it confusing to find the right settings.
  • The customization options are somewhat limited without advanced CSS/dev skills, and the basic functions can be a bit challenging for some non-technical users.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Our business depends upon this software to provide information on all aspects of our business. The future of business is a marriage between web site and customer interaction. This software will allow us to move in that direction.
Read full review
The tool is easy to use. Even without a dedicated product owner we feel confident using the system for our needs.
Read full review
Usability
This rating has a caveat - there is always room for improvement, and this team gets it. You always learn from customers how to do things better and easier, so it is a constant learning of how people use the site. Although the search engine is exceptional, most people do not use it as their first line of research. Much of the usability has to do with layout - and is not just a software usability item, so the rating is severely dependent up on the layout/options you choose for your usage. And their team will do anything in their power to get the results and layout you want. The areas that need improvement - and acknowledged by the team - are the administrative tools. There are a ton of options, and it takes a little to learn some of those. For most people, however, this won't be an issue, because the support team will always help you. This is always the case with more power. If there were fewer options it would no doubt be easier, but they give you the keys to all of the cars in the lot; so a little more to learn.
Read full review
As I said before, LumApps platform is not intuitive at all, people have a lot of trouble using the tool, the curve to learn is too high, mainly the style part, is so confusing what I am adjusting there, is the outside of the widget? What does the padding do, what does the margin does.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Never any problems. Quite impressed
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Works in real time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have always found Communifire support to be exceptional. We have had a personal account manager who has been very helpful.
Read full review
Question and bug support are very helpful and quick. About the feature requests, we don’t have much visibility of the features that we suggested, or If they are going to implement some solutions or not.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I found the system to be very flexible and the Communifire team very supportive in helping me identify solutions for my goals.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I evaluated a number of platforms. Here's the list: Mango Apps, Jive, Jostle, Zyncro, Bitrix 24, Exo platform, Huddle, Confluence, Hip Chat, Wrike, Hive. Some of the other platforms were really nice but Communifire was the platform that best meet our needs.
Read full review
It overall stacked up incredibly against all its competitors. Its customer service, simple to use format, and ease of implementation were hard to beat. We got up and running in about 6-8 months and it was right on schedule for implementation. It's feature set was smaller then it's competitors but even at first glance it was much easier to use for the amount customization it contained. We considered factors when purchasing like ease of use, adaptability, and look/feel overall as a product. No product came close to LumApps on these features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Faster, more consistent onboarding. We host all training materials in an easy-to-access and easy-to-update space.
  • Better product knowledge = greater sales. We post training information about new products for immediate use by all team members.
  • Better communication within the store team translates to better customer service. Keeping part time team members up-to-date has always been a challenge. Now they are able to catch up quickly when they get to the store.
Read full review
  • It is starting to reduce our reliance on email, and the overall volume of email.
  • It has created a smoother induction process for new starters because it is a central place where all employees can go for the core information and resources they need to stay informed and do their job.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Axero Screenshots

Screenshot of Mobile intranetScreenshot of Knowledge managementScreenshot of Recognition

LumApps Screenshots

Screenshot of Example HomepageScreenshot of Example NewsCenterScreenshot of Example Mobile HomepageScreenshot of Example User ProfileScreenshot of Example Applauncher