LumApps

LumApps

39 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
LumApps	Score 8.5 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	LumApps is an Employee Experience Platform that engages every employee with personalized communications, regardless of location, and empowers them to do their best work by connecting them with the tools, people, and information they need to get the job done. Integrations with both Microsoft and Google enables employees to share knowledge, resources, and connect with each other. The employee experience platform aligns and engages digital workplaces, and enables…	N/A

Pricing

LumApps

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
LumApps
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

Additional Details

Pricing is upon request.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	LumApps
Considered Both Products	LumApps Keenan Kibrick Intranet Manager Chose LumApps It overall stacked up incredibly against all its competitors. Its customer service, simple to use format, and ease of implementation were hard to beat. We got up and running in about 6-8 months and it was right on schedule for implementation. It's feature set was smaller … Helpful? Lisa Capra Revenue Knowledge Stratrgy Manager Chose LumApps Our organization selected LumApps for its customizability, integrations with the Google suite, Slack, etc., in addition to the customizable meta-data that would allow for a unique user experience for our global teams so that users in the Latin American region, for example, … Helpful? Kelly Bingham Internal Communications Manager Chose LumApps LumApps works with SharePoint and provides a much easier and more intuitive user interface. It is fairly simple to learn the basics, although plan to spend more time to really dive into all that it can offer and become an expert in the product. They seem very entuned to the … Incentivized Helpful? Mark Small HR Business Analyst Chose LumApps Because we're on Google Workspace, it just made sense to use LumApps. We also use AODocs, and they all work together very well. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose LumApps LumApps formatting an end-user views look much better, but Drupal is much easier to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose LumApps We looked at several, but our parent company was using LumApps and it made the most sense to stick with them. Incentivized Helpful? AJ Aaditya Jadhav Sr Business Solutions Analyst Chose LumApps Google based platform was more suited for our organization since we are on a G-suite Incentivized Helpful? ED Ella Delaney senior associate Chose LumApps I was not part of the selection process. We do have teams that are using SharePoint due to the fact that their teams use MS Teams heavily to share and collaborate. Some teams find it easier to simply build out SharePoint pages because their Teams content already lives on SharePo… Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose LumApps It was not flexible enough for us and the granularity of permissions doesn’t attend us. Its a good tool but for simple sharing content. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose LumApps LumApps is more fit for purpose for a collaborative intranet. Lots of features related to internal communications. However, some of the tools provided are not intuitive for people who have experience with other CMS platforms. The setup is a bit challenging, and will likely … Incentivized Helpful? KL Kate Linton Head of Design Chose LumApps SharePoint is also fairly easy to use for content creators. SharePoint has been around for a very long time and is a powerful enterprise tool when it is well implemented, but implementation is critical to ensure that both the brand experience and usability for content owners … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose LumApps LumApps certainly outperforms some of these platforms on the enterprise level due to their partnership with employee management services like Okta. That said, the content management aspect becomes more difficult because the management process feels very manual and rigid. Bulk … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose LumApps LumApps is so much easier to use. With SharePoint, you probably need a developer due to its complexity. You don't need that at all with LumApps. Marketing and HR professionals can easily learn it. It is best to lean on LumApps or a partner to build out a few templates to get … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose LumApps LumApps offers organizations both a data push and a data pull option. Controlling page viewership by the audience sets this tool apart from many other communication options. When organizations put in the appropriate design time effort to leverage LumApps' feature set, their … Incentivized Helpful? Todd Nilson Owner, Digital Strategist Chose LumApps We did not formally compare these platforms. I have worked on them with other clients. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Program Manager Chose LumApps Simpplr was the closest but we didn't think they could scale. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Vice-President Chose LumApps Google Sites is not meant to be an intranet, we were using it well beyond its intention, but it was free (and we use G Suite for everything else). We demoed Jive and Facebook for Business, but neither sufficed for an intranet that also needed to be a repository for documents, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose LumApps We previously used apps like Coda and Lessonly for user-generated content that we shared on our internal communication channels. Coda and Google Docs work well for frequent collaboration. Lessonly works well for engaging learning content. We added in LumApps to manage content … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose LumApps n/a Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose LumApps We used Jive previously. From a capability standpoint, Jive was very strong. It could do a lot, and it did it mostly well. However, Jive was purchased and the company that bought them ruined the product. We would have severe downtime (sometimes for multiple days), and support … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose LumApps I was not part of the team on product selection at that time. Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Google workspace Pro Integration with google Pro Different levels
Top Cons	Minus Back end Minus Customization options Minus Copying and pasting

Best Alternatives
	LumApps
Small Businesses	Concrete CMS Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Workvivo Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	Workvivo Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	LumApps
Likelihood to Recommend	8.5 (29 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.8 (2 ratings)
Usability	7.5 (25 ratings)
Support Rating	8.0 (1 ratings)
Configurability	8.1 (3 ratings)
Ease of integration	7.4 (25 ratings)

User Testimonials
	LumApps
Likelihood to Recommend	LumApps Suited for- It's a great one start shop for information. If you want your data all in one place and easy to access, you cannot beat LumApps for this. It's ease of placing pages across multiple sectors, menu navigation, and org chart integration are lovely. It showcases information and files very well with easy web page design that brings it all together. With only a little bit of training many people can use the product and create content. Less Appropriate- While great at what it does it is still a place to showcase information, not house it. It's not a replacement for Microsoft or Google regarding online file storage. It does not do the storage. It just makes files easy to access if your company houses them already. This same idea applies to Active Directory, it can do a lot of great customization of roles and allow/highlight information for people if they already have great data about people. It is a challenge if the backend data profiles of a person are not already syncing from other systems. Keenan Kibrick Intranet Manager Read full review
Pros	LumApps Offers simple addition of custom content types that give the ability to apply different access and distribution levels. The HTML widget allows for the simple removal of WYSIWG tools to simplify the view for content contributors. The ability to rearrange layouts is very simple. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	LumApps The editing user interface is a bit wonky and occasionally glitchy. The back-end options are not organized super well, which can make it confusing to find the right settings. The customization options are somewhat limited without advanced CSS/dev skills, and the basic functions can be a bit challenging for some non-technical users. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	LumApps The tool is easy to use. Even without a dedicated product owner we feel confident using the system for our needs. Incentivized Kelly Bingham Internal Communications Manager Read full review
Usability	LumApps If you are a content owner, you need to learn how to use the tools and this can be time-consuming and not simple. We rely on the support of our internal LumApps team to provide support and train us on the tools. But it is fairly convenient once you know how to use it correctly. Incentivized KL Kate Linton Head of Design Read full review
Support Rating	LumApps Question and bug support are very helpful and quick. About the feature requests, we don’t have much visibility of the features that we suggested, or If they are going to implement some solutions or not. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	LumApps Our organization selected LumApps for its customizability, integrations with the Google suite, Slack, etc., in addition to the customizable meta-data that would allow for a unique user experience for our global teams so that users in the Latin American region, for example, would no longer be inundated with content that did not apply to their region or market. Lisa Capra Revenue Knowledge Stratrgy Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	LumApps after migration, it has reduced time for Internal Comms to create and publish content (for some content that we can import as a chart, like anniversary celebrations, we've been able to reduce the time from 4-6 hours down to about 15 minutes) we haven't used long it enough to see ROI on other facets, but not having divisions create their own websites unbeknownst to anyone else is invaluable Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	LumApps Screenshots