Azure App Service vs. IBM Cloud Code Engine vs. SAP Business Technology Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure App Service
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
The Microsoft Azure App Service is a PaaS that enables users to build, deploy, and scale web apps and APIs, a fully managed service with built-in infrastructure maintenance, security patching, and scaling. Includes Azure Web Apps, Azure Mobile Apps, Azure API Apps, allowing developers to use popular frameworks including .NET, .NET Core, Java, Node.js, Python, PHP, and Ruby.
$9.49
per month
IBM Cloud Code Engine
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload…N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) is the company's Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offering, that brings together intelligent enterprise applications with database and data management, analytics, integration and extension capabilities into one platform for both cloud and hybrid environments, including hundreds of pre-built integrations for SAP and third-party applications.N/A
Pricing
Azure App ServiceIBM Cloud Code EngineSAP Business Technology Platform
Editions & Modules
Shared Environment for dev/test
$9.49
per month
Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test
$54.75
per month
Standard Run production workloads
$73
per month
Premium Enhanced performance and scale
$146
per month
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure App ServiceIBM Cloud Code EngineSAP Business Technology Platform
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFree and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure App ServiceIBM Cloud Code EngineSAP Business Technology Platform
Considered Multiple Products
Azure App Service

No answer on this topic

IBM Cloud Code Engine
Chose IBM Cloud Code Engine
If IBM wants to get ahead, it needs to add AI and make it seamless on the project configuration, real time chat with AI will help developers to increase speed and have less problems integrating the code into their business logic. There's no marketing using influencers, YT code …
Chose IBM Cloud Code Engine
Cloud engine is much easier to use, and gives a very clear interface and control. Each application can be configured differently with ease and changed without having to know anything about different subscription levels or inner workings of the system. Just change the resource …
SAP Business Technology Platform
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
More tight Integration in the SAP world
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Integration is the main reason for SAP API Management. We use Azure Data lake in quite a few instances.
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Its pricing and the ease to deploy and managing the applications.
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
I'm not sure of similar products.
Features
Azure App ServiceIBM Cloud Code EngineSAP Business Technology Platform
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Azure App Service
6.4
7 Ratings
19% below category average
IBM Cloud Code Engine
6.6
15 Ratings
16% below category average
SAP Business Technology Platform
7.5
820 Ratings
3% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces7.47 Ratings00 Ratings7.9784 Ratings
Scalability7.17 Ratings6.515 Ratings8.0781 Ratings
Platform management overhead7.27 Ratings00 Ratings7.4740 Ratings
Workflow engine capability6.45 Ratings00 Ratings7.6656 Ratings
Platform access control7.66 Ratings00 Ratings7.5750 Ratings
Services-enabled integration6.16 Ratings6.715 Ratings7.9736 Ratings
Development environment creation6.47 Ratings00 Ratings7.9725 Ratings
Development environment replication6.16 Ratings00 Ratings7.5633 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification6.37 Ratings00 Ratings7.0716 Ratings
Issue recovery4.56 Ratings00 Ratings6.8635 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes4.96 Ratings00 Ratings7.4679 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure App ServiceIBM Cloud Code EngineSAP Business Technology Platform
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure App ServiceIBM Cloud Code EngineSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(9 ratings)
6.8
(15 ratings)
8.4
(672 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.9
(24 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
6.2
(11 ratings)
7.8
(660 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.8
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(455 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(11 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.8
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.9
(3 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
2.9
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure App ServiceIBM Cloud Code EngineSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service if they were written in Visual Studio IDE (typically.NET applications). With a few clicks of the mouse, you may already deploy your application to a remote server using the Visual Studio IDE. As a result of the portal's bulk and complexity, I propose Heroku for less-experienced developers.
Read full review
IBM
It would be a good solution for running serverless applications. Because infrastructure setup and maintenance expenses can be avoided, the investment will pay for itself. The time to value is short, allowing IT to respond to business demands quickly. It aided us in customizing security as well as operating a personal project using to autoscale up and down approach. Also, because there isn't much hassle, items can be pushed into production as soon as possible. Simply push a container, create an application, and you're ready to go. But, It is less suited when you have a static machine or need to keep data in some way and do not want to utilize network storage or a database.
Read full review
SAP
If you want to use a well-designed SAP technology to shift into the cloud, you will be more than satisfied with the BTP services overall. There are some improvements for beginners to help them get a better overview of what to do and how to start with their account. My recommendation is to take a foundation training course from the SAP learning hub to prepare for the first steps.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Extremely easy to deploy and update from Visual Studio
  • It integrates seamlessly with other Azure PaaS resources
  • It has an in-depth integration with AppInsights, so you can understand errors and their root cause easily.
  • Easy to create and delete, what is not the same case in a IaaS resource
  • It escalates based on CPU workload and some other resource variables.
  • Configuration changes are almost immediate
  • Offers an excellent abstraction from hardware backend of the platform
  • That's updated very often, saving time and the risk of a self-performed update over a IaaS
  • That's really easy to develop for Web Apps
  • It supports Function Apps and Web Apps into the same "cost black box"
Read full review
IBM
  • Managed Environment for partners and customers - shifting skills and speed to CSP
  • A variety of programming model support
  • Elastic scalability for cloud native development and speed
  • Flexible consumption model
  • Containerized workloads with horizontal scalability
  • Here is an example - live demo walk-thru delivered to partners and community:
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCBClYgpDFg
Read full review
SAP
  • It is very easy to use.
  • All the documentation around it is geared towards the enterprise use case, unlike some other hyperscalers' platforms.
  • The SAP Business Technology Platform is very good because it's got the SAP customer and their business processes in mind. Probably my favorite thing about it is how easy it is to get up and running with a new use case and how well it natively connects to an SAP solution.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Jumps between resource sizes can get expensive
  • You may wind up putting a lot of eggs in one basket--not necessarily a con but something to keep in mind (most of your data will likely be managed and processed through Microsoft products/services if you fully commit to Azure App Service).
  • Learning new technology. If you're moving from on-premises to Azure App Service (or any cloud solutions), you'll likely have to rethink how things are done to achieve the same end results (and/or resources may become expensive quickly).
Read full review
IBM
  • the pricing structure is complicated, and the servers are expensive. I really think they should offer better pricing options and support for more languages
  • sometimes the servers go down, and they take too long to respond to support tickets
  • uploading documents is slow since I have to do it one by one, making the process much longer than it should be
Read full review
SAP
  • The Automation Integration service has some outdated workflows
  • New services should be available as entitlements as soon as they are released for a particular region without having to buy them from SAP for zero dollars
  • Any subaccount should be able to change the IAS tenant. Currently, if you set it up for a particular IAS, you cannot change to another tenant and are required to recreate the services in a new subaccount.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
Since this capability supports a wide variety of use cases - all on non proprietary and open technology based frameworks
Read full review
SAP
Seamless integration with external system and dashboard to monitor the data flow and analysis are very essential for the business. The way the product is designed and modelled lead to minimum business disruptions. Adopting to the new and modern technology was easy. Keeping the central system as clean and adopting project bases development are advantages.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I have given this rating because Azure App Service performs very well in terms of speed, reliability, and reducing overhead, and improves overall team productivity, with a little scope for improvement in complex testing scenarios and configurations, scalability concerns in a large setup, and similar tracking and audit needs.
Read full review
IBM
Consumers can purchase individual components as well as unlocking new bundles with special features and services including the extensive data management governance capabilities of the Automation range. Kubernetes containerizing for effective service implementation and an agile, flexible multi-cloud data program help both utilization expansion and deployment to be improved by this architecture.
Read full review
SAP
Okay, so the content that we have built on the platform is limited to specific testing on the iFlows within integration suite. The visualization layer is nice to use and helps with the design elements, however with developers that are more used to markup languages, it doesn't have the same CLI type feel when you want it. Perhaps the majority of users are that deep, but other platforms have a better CLI type developer experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
No answers on this topic
SAP
Services are generally available
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Microsoft has always been known for providing a high standard in terms of customer support and Azure App Service (and as a matter of fact the whole Azure Platform) is no exception. Azure App Service never caused us any issues and we only contacted their customer support for questions regarding server locations and pricing. I feel pretty satisfied with how they treat their customers.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
SAP
The biggest problem we ran into was communication between SAP Business Technology Platform and onsite resources. Unfortunately our SAP Business Technology Platform and Cloud systems are under different customer numbers. I constantly had to open tickets under each customer number because I was unsure of where the issue lied. And having to create a dummy ticket for our ECC systems to open the ECC connections for another ticket under the Cloud customer is a pain.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
No answers on this topic
SAP
Training material in Developers Community or from Learning hub are really good... also most of the time we route through Discovery center... so materials provided by SAP is really good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
No answers on this topic
SAP
Having a full cloud native environment for devlopment of microservices and digitals solutions while having standardized access to our core data on SAP via cloud connector is one of the main benefits of using BTP over others hypervisors. BTP is the standard hyperscaler as soon as something relies on data from SAP systems in our company now
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
When we chose it, we did so because of its integration with Microsoft applications; now we need to integrate with AI, and Azure doesn't offer a good integration. That is the main reason to change it. It is still great to develop Windows- and Microsoft-based applications, but if we need to integrate with AI, Google wins by far.
Read full review
IBM
What impresses me most about IBM Cloud Code Engine is the container workload management capability and the Cloud services and dataflow monitoring functionalities. Data security and network security control via IBM Cloud Code Engine is quite excellent and very responsive data integration functions and the first deployment is not very technical.
Read full review
SAP
SAP Concur allows our staff to book, reimburse and remain spend audit compliant. Our Concur system takes feed from Workday and interacts with Credit card vendor. It also makes posting to Accounting and does clearing. SAP Business Technology Platform helped in establishing connection with all these different tools in real time. It helps in getting paid to the card service provider through our Bank through interface, which is built on SAP Business Technology Platform.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
IBM
No answers on this topic
SAP
It's scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Deployment of ASP.NET apps at the organization has been sped up.
  • An option to offer access to the version control system on a third platform so that we could easily deploy our apps.
  • Because of Azure App Service's scalability capabilities, the costs of running the services are kept to a minimum. As a result, we may save hundreds of dollars each month compared to the expenses of traditional servers by using fewer resources during slack periods.
Read full review
IBM
  • [One] positive is that we have one tool to learn (and a simple one) for all kinds of deployment. We need less people to maintain the system.
  • We have saved a lot of time on trouble shooting. It's clear how it works. It's "just" kubernetes..
Read full review
SAP
  • Infusing Generative AI capabilities easily into our solutions with existing talent with minimal learning curve, has been very impactful. We have been able resolve several challenges for our clients with AI capabilities, that we could not, previously.
  • Integration Suite is quite extensive in capabilities for bringing together the IT landscape into a single ecosystem.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots

Screenshot of

SAP Business Technology Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Process Automation, an SAP BTP service