Bitdefender GravityZone vs. Webroot Endpoint Protection

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bitdefender GravityZone
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Bitdefender GravityZone combines multiple security services into a single platform to reduce the cost of building a trusted environment for endpoints.N/A
Webroot Endpoint Protection
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Webroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics. For SMBs, Webroot Smarter Cybersecurity solutions were designed from the ground up to stop advanced threats like ransomware and phishing. For MSPs, the company offers the Webroot® Business Endpoint Protection + MDR security solution.
$150
per 5 seats
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business Endpoint Protection
$150.00
per 5 seats
Business Endpoint Protection
$690.00
per 25 seats
Business Endpoint Protection
Contact sales team
per 50+ seats
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
Considered Both Products
Bitdefender GravityZone
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
We switched from WebRoot over 3 years ago. WebRoot was missing a lot of threats due to its design.
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
We switched from Kaspersky Endpoint Security to BitDefender, due to public perception, monthly pricing model and centralized management across multi-tenant. We then switched from BitDefender to Webroot as this product had the same features as BitDefender as well as better Apple …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Compared to Malwarebytes and Webroot (Endpoint Protection), Bitdefender is far superior. A principal reason for switching was the high detection rate, near 100%, along with heuristics and the ability to neutralise zero-day threats. Previous products we've used fell short of the …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender GravityZone was programmed better for the average business owner then Webroot SecureAnywhere. Webroot has a more difficult learning curve, is very technical, and is not as lightweight as Bitdefender GravityZone. The makers of Bitdefender GravityZone seemed to put …
Chose Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender has better results than most of the others. As to why it won against Kaspersky, it is because the dashboard is easier to manage.
Webroot Endpoint Protection
Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection
Some of the other options available to us were less expensive than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Still, either required too much management on our end didn't offer multi-platform protection or didn't have all of the features we were looking for.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Bitdefender GravityZone
8.6
58 Ratings
1% above category average
Webroot Endpoint Protection
7.6
18 Ratings
11% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology9.054 Ratings8.916 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.954 Ratings9.013 Ratings
Centralized Management8.258 Ratings7.018 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support6.137 Ratings7.111 Ratings
Infection Remediation9.853 Ratings7.018 Ratings
Vulnerability Management7.352 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Malware Detection9.958 Ratings7.018 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
Small Businesses
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.1 out of 10
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 8.7 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(67 ratings)
7.5
(23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(2 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
5.6
(54 ratings)
9.5
(8 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(7 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bitdefender GravityZoneWebroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
Bitdefender
It just works. I have seen multiple viruses and malware get past other antivirus software like TrendMicro, Webroot, and Kaspersky. Bitdefender GravityZone always catches what others miss. It has a very light footprint when it comes to system resources. The centralized management console is nice, but I prefer the console before they redesigned the UI.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
The software tends to do a good job of basic protection but is not the best for larger clients and is not as powerful as some others offered on the market today. The support is not the best either, have had a hard time getting assistance in the past trying to resolve issues.
Read full review
Pros
Bitdefender
  • Once installed, Bitdefender [GravityZone] runs silently in the background with little to no need for user interaction.
  • The cloud-based console provides for easy computer management and deployment.
  • Bitdefender [GravityZone] is extremely flexible, with a policy-based system wherein different profiles can be created (i.e. a policy to deactivate the firewall, a policy to allow for admin control on a machine, etc.) and pushed out to individual computers.
  • Computers can be grouped into different categories, with different policies automatically deployed to each category.
  • Bitdefender [GravityZone] is relatively resource-light and runs well even on lower-end computers.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
  • It is very light weight and does not tax the computers resources
  • Has a quick scan and does not take forevere when scanning
  • It's central management on the web makes it easy to use and gives tons of control for Admins
Read full review
Cons
Bitdefender
  • Who do I ask? This is my chief complaint is once the initial licenses were purchased through Bit Defender, there was no one to contact that could help navigate some of the initial questions I had with regard to specific policies to implement for our file server. The parent web site is, well, hard to navigate when one is trying to "learn" the system.
  • The second issue is in increasing the licenses. It took several days for the parent company (by contact and phone) to inform me that they could not increase the licenses and I would have to go through a private vendor. There was no intent to connect me to a vendor or provide a vendor list until I asked specifically. YET I continue to get email from the parent company reminding me to pay an annual fee for the licenses purchase through the private vendor. The parent company can see the number of licenses yet did not sell them to me.
  • Gravity Zone Dashboard, while excellent for those who have experience, is not particularly intuitive for those who have never used it. There does not seem to be a lot of documentation for those responsible for implementation.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
  • There are several configuration options for both end-point and DNS protection. Would like a more simple way to understand and validate settings.
  • Support is heavily video or FAQ based although you can submit a Support Ticket. Would like more availability to an actual support engineer.
  • Overtime you can forget how to change setting - a refresher course would be nice, especially as new features are added to the solution.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Bitdefender
It works. I rely heavily on my vendors to provide a product that works, is easy to implement, and that they support. As well as be a decent value for the money
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
It has proven successful so far in our environment for controlling malware/virus outbreaks.
Read full review
Usability
Bitdefender
The console is easy to use, but has grown to have a lot of functionality. The only challenge is that all functions (even disabled and not installed ones) are shown. It would be great if only the functions that are active would be visible.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
Like I said before, sometimes I can't find what I need to change a setting.
Read full review
Support Rating
Bitdefender
Support is an area Bitdefender has always struggled with. While their products work great, the GravityZone dashboard is very technical in nature. If you aren't IT inclined, it could be difficult to setup. While most times support is helpful, we tend to work with them over email because of their very thick accent, they are hard to understand over the phone.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
Support has been reliable up to this point. A request can easily be generated via the console and support responding in a reasonable time. We have not had any major issues other than the basic agents not communicating with the console and the like.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Bitdefender
No answers on this topic
Webroot, an OpenText company
I had some difficulties with remote users. I ended up needing to open a remote tech support session and finish the process. Other than a few speed bumps, I was impressed with the engineering of the install. Because of time differences, I was done installing in two days. The cost, per license, could be less.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bitdefender
We were a Kaspersky shop for years. Kaspersky was a resource hog and it didn't even block half of what was thrown at it. We had more outbreaks and more end-user complaints in a year of Kaspersky then we have had in almost three years of Bitdefender.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
We found other products to be able to detect malware and malicious URL's better than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Thus, we moved away from Webroot Endpoint Protection. Also, over the years, there were at least 2 big mistakes by Webroot, where our business applications were flagged as malicious as a false positive. Webroot did a public apology, but those mistakes were highly disruptive.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bitdefender
  • The ROI for Bitdefender is hard to quantify except that it requires very little maintenance time from our staff.
  • We've spent no time troubleshooting user complaints or issues from users, so it has been a big time-saver over our previously used anti-malware software.
  • Bitdefender's customer service is usually pretty good and also very responsive, so I don't have to wait by the phone or to keep checking email to resolve a problem--although our issues have been mostly informational and not a problem with functionality.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
  • The licenses are pretty expensive but less costly than an actual malware infestation.
  • We have tremendous peace of mind knowing that our machines and communications are secure.
  • Our IT consultants are a little more involved in day-to-day management than they were before deploying Webroot Endpoint Protection, which means an increase in cost, but again this is a fair price to pay for protection against Internet threats.
Read full review
ScreenShots