Centage vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Centage delivers FP&A software that helps finance teams automate budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. Offered to teams that have outgrown Excel, Centage aims to replace fragile spreadsheets and version chaos with a faster, more reliable planning process. Centage’s built-in financial and business logic allows users to create and update their budgets and forecasts and never worry about formulas, functions, links, or any custom programming. It offers synchronized P&L, balance sheet,…
$1,750
per month
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
CentageMicrosoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
Core
1,750
per month
Performance
2,500
per month
Strategic
3,500
per month
No answers on this topic
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CentageMicrosoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CentageMicrosoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Considered Multiple Products
Centage
Chose Centage
I don't recall the names of other budget software. Centage was more user friendly and required less "programming" by our staff.
Microsoft Dynamics GP

No answer on this topic

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

No answer on this topic

Features
CentageMicrosoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
4.4
3 Ratings
53% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
3 Ratings
30% below category average
Customizable dashboards4.43 Ratings00 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings00 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
6.9
9 Ratings
12% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.7
23 Ratings
15% below category average
Drill-down analysis6.89 Ratings00 Ratings6.022 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.67 Ratings00 Ratings7.021 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.46 Ratings00 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Centage
7.4
5 Ratings
8% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.5
19 Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web5.51 Ratings00 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.33 Ratings00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
Report Versioning8.55 Ratings00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.31 Ratings00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.3
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
3 Ratings
23% below category average
Predictive Analytics8.34 Ratings00 Ratings5.13 Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings00 Ratings6.83 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.8
10 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
24 Ratings
15% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.810 Ratings00 Ratings7.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.010 Ratings00 Ratings6.023 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.010 Ratings00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.99 Ratings00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.44 Ratings00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.6
11 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.6
38 Ratings
20% below category average
Long-term financial planning8.48 Ratings00 Ratings7.030 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.711 Ratings00 Ratings7.038 Ratings
Forecasting8.710 Ratings00 Ratings6.037 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.09 Ratings00 Ratings6.035 Ratings
Management reporting8.511 Ratings00 Ratings7.033 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.5
7 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.3
20 Ratings
6% below category average
Financial data consolidation8.66 Ratings00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting8.37 Ratings00 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings00 Ratings6.014 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Centage
8.1
11 Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
34 Ratings
9% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting7.79 Ratings00 Ratings7.029 Ratings
Management Reporting8.210 Ratings00 Ratings8.032 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting8.810 Ratings00 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.66 Ratings00 Ratings6.028 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings00 Ratings6.019 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
7.5
4 Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.8
25 Ratings
17% below category average
Personalized dashboards7.53 Ratings00 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis7.64 Ratings00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting7.53 Ratings00 Ratings6.024 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings00 Ratings6.024 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Centage
7.7
9 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.0
36 Ratings
15% below category average
Flat file integration7.56 Ratings00 Ratings7.034 Ratings
Excel data integration8.57 Ratings00 Ratings7.032 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.15 Ratings00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pay calculation00 Ratings6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings5.915 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings2.526 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings6.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings5.732 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.240 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings3.529 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.239 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.539 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
48 Ratings
42% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Accounts payable00 Ratings6.445 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings5.836 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings5.641 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings4.528 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings2.819 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings3.214 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings4.721 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings3.818 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings4.626 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings2.816 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings3.817 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings3.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.4
26 Ratings
50% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking00 Ratings6.024 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings1.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings4.115 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
25 Ratings
70% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pricing00 Ratings3.618 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings3.621 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings1.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings5.125 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings5.29 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings3.612 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings3.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Centage
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings00 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CentageMicrosoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 5.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 9.8 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.0 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.4 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CentageMicrosoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(12 ratings)
4.1
(54 ratings)
8.5
(46 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(7 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(3 ratings)
5.5
(10 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(3 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
8.2
(16 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CentageMicrosoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Centage
Centage is suited for all types of business. This is what makes this tool so great. It requires some expertise in setting it up and depending on how complex the business is, it may take longer than expected. It's a complex system and if you are not involved in the implementtion it might be hard to learn what is does.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Oracle
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
Centage
  • Planning personnel with all the related benefit expenses is very accurate and we are able to forecast increases as well.
  • Storing separate versions of the budget allows us to finalize for the year and have access to the data while we update the default plan with any changes.
  • I ilke the way you can add intelligence see the detail of calculations below th eline item.
  • I like writing Planning Maestro reports to see drill downs of any item and tie them to our ERP Budget
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Oracle
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
Centage
  • Head count is a bit strange as each period is considered one Headcount for a total of 12 per year, so we have to adjust when running reports
  • would love to be able to attach related expenses in payroll to a kind of employee instead of doing each individually. It's time consuming.
  • Have the help more available instead of having to log into separate place
Read full review
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The limitation of constrained out of the box dimensions that requires ripping the initial implementation to add the new dimensions is a major drawback.
  • Smartview interface is cumbersome for many.
  • The only financial adapter is available for integration for other modules we have to go with file-based uploads which is cumbersome and not real-time.
  • It is very costly in terms of licensing unlike other Oracle products.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Centage
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Oracle
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
Centage
I've lived through the changes over the years, and I have found that most financially-minded professionals should have no problems using this system.
Read full review
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Oracle
It produces consolidated multi currency reports faster and more accurately whilst adding additional pivotal functionality. The Smartview reporting is a key for us and a flagstone of the application
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Centage
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
Centage
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
Centage
The team makes sure that you get what you need out of the software. They will do whatever is in their power to make sure you're happy and are getting back your investment (time and money).
Read full review
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Oracle
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Centage
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Oracle
I suggest doubling the time to implement from the initial quote you get from the Sales team. That's always been the case for me for multiple EPMs now. The out-of-the-box functionality of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is pretty robust so I appreciate that and it really helped us get the ball rolling quickly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Centage
I used to use an older consolidating product call FRX or something like that, very manual where accounts were adding line the reporting lines one by one.... Centage is far superior, the ability to create custom Dimension hierarchies as improved our reporting 100 fold
Read full review
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Read full review
Scalability
Centage
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Oracle
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Centage
  • We were a very small company growing by acquisition so it worked well during these phases of our company growth.
  • The return for our cost was tremendous especially in comparison to peers in the market.
  • Analytics Maestro allowed us to grow without adding headcount by building efficient reports that can easily be mass-produced for all branches within our organization.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Oracle
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Centage Screenshots

Screenshot of Centage DashboardScreenshot of ReportingScreenshot of Operating expensesScreenshot of Revenue Planning

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment