ChartHop, from the company of the same name in New York, is an organization management platform, providing org chart that integrates with HRIS systems, workforce analytics with custom reporting, and tools to support people and succession planning, compensation plans, and process performance reviews and data.
$0
per month per user
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Worktango
Score 9.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
The Kazoo Employee Experience Platform aims to bring together everything needed to create a high-performing, connected culture regardless of where employees work or what device they use. The vendor states that by combining Goals & OKRs, Recognition, Feedback, Conversations, and Incentives within a single platform, employees become more engaged, managers become better leaders, and productivity and business performance soars. The vendor positions the Kazoo Employee Experience Platform as the…
N/A
Pricing
ChartHop
PeopleFluent
Worktango
Editions & Modules
ChartHop Basic
$0
per month per seat
ChartHop Modules
Contact us
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ChartHop
PeopleFluent
Worktango
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ChartHop
PeopleFluent
Worktango
Features
ChartHop
PeopleFluent
Worktango
Workforce Analytics
Comparison of Workforce Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
8.4
6 Ratings
1% below category average
PeopleFluent
-
Ratings
Worktango
-
Ratings
Automated data collection
9.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data analysis
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data integration
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Predictive analytics
6.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benchmarking
7.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report designer
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-built content
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service insights
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
10% above category average
Worktango
-
Ratings
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
11% above category average
Worktango
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Worktango
-
Ratings
Performance plans
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
4.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
7% below category average
Worktango
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
ChartHop
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
29% above category average
Worktango
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Not Suited - The tool is suited for organizations with an employee count of more than >500. There are much cheaper tools out there for a company size of below 500 employees. Integration with other tools can be improved. Suited - From an admin POV who sometimes works closely with HRs, customization and storing information is great.
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
Great at recognition/engagement and performance management all in one place. Easy for admins to manage and for team members to navigate. If you would like to have a robust platform for goal setting, feedback, and performance reviews, Kazoo could be a great fit.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
The ability to create custom reports as admins would be a nice feature.
A feature that allows managers of the employees to be loaded into YEI and then they can receive a breakdown of the recognition of their direct reports periodically would be a nice feature.
Ways for the employee to create their own reports to see their own receiving and giving metrics.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
For teams and people who have enough time to learn the platform or enough patience to read through documentation or to watch through tutorials, the platform is pretty usable and it is relatively easy to pick up new concepts and how to do certain things, specifically around self-service if there is some problem. With that being said, the platform can sometimes be inherently unintuitive with certain edge cases
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
This product seems to outperform the competition in the reviews that we're aware of. Not surprisingly, we've been extremely pleased with this product. It's funny to think that a simple piece of software could add so much by way of positivity to our workplace, but it most definitely has. We love this program.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.