Checkout.com vs. WePay

Checkout offers great service and expertise and stands above its peers in full-service offering, integration, and ongoing support. However, Checkout is not suitable in a scenario where Paysend is fully licensed and a direct acquirer of the scheme. In this scenario, Paysend can perform the full value chain in-house.

Incentivized

It is good when you need a temporary (or permanent) solution to get funds to your bank account for something as small as a one time event, recurring or larger. It has reputable companies that use it and seems to integrate easily with most systems and accounts. You will have to go through a whole setup, with your bank accounts, etc.

Incentivized

• They provide excellent advice from knowledgeable subject matter experts on all things payments.
• They adapt quickly to our business-changing needs, helping us stay agile as our business grows.
• They provide trustworthy and reliable services that enable us to take payments with as little friction as possible.
• They are as passionate about performance as we are, working closely with us to ensure we maximize the chances of success for every transaction.

Incentivized

• Easy for new users to set up a WePay account.
• Easy and quick for users with WePay accounts to make donations.
• Fairly quick payouts to organizations who receive donations through our platform.

Incentivized

• Their dashboard can get better. They have been making improvements
• Faster settlements as it's a bit of a pain to have big reserves till ACH clears every day
• Much stronger consumer facing brand name in the US so more end customers trust the links powered by Checkout.com

Incentivized

• Admin reporting could be improved
• Fees are pulled out of each transaction instead of aggregated at the end of the month (this could be a pro for some users)
• Difficult to give switch the admin role after it has already been assigned
• No credit card swipers
• Only way to process a transaction is directly through the website

Incentivized

We have a long term contract and we already have them in our plans for the next 5 years.

Incentivized

In the last 3 years that I have been working with Checkout.com, they had an unplanned outage that lasted less than a few minutes. Their uptime is amazing. If they have maintenance, unlike banks, they don't have downtime during this time. We frequently require their support and Checkout.com responds to us within minutes. When we have important rollouts, I schedule calls with our merchant support manager to monitor the rollout/perform tests, etc. It is always easy to find time lost even with short notice.

Incentivized

Checkout.com performance as an acquirer and a PSP is excellent. We have too many transactions per day, therefore reports take some time to generate before they are available for downloading. But it indeed takes reasonable time. We use native/h2h integration therefore, there is no redirection issue, all pages load quickly on our side. Based on my experience, Checkout.com will never never integrate with software or systems that will slow them down. Amongst all payment methods they offer, all are processed immediately, without delays.

Incentivized

When we were discovering the possibility of opening an entity in the United States to process transactions as domestic cards, Checkout.com did not just quickly provide the requirements to open that market as we asked them to but showed us slides with all the possibilities we had for each of their licenses in the world, calculating an estimate of the acquiring costs and acceptance rate we would have, based on the cross-border volumes we were processing with them, to evaluate other ways to improve our business.

Incentivized

Both CyberSource and Ingenico provided poor support on any types of issues. Integration was a nightmare as it took months just to set them up as compared to Checkout.com. Checkout.com provided us with quick integration and constant monitoring of our transactions which is what we really needed.

Incentivized

PayPal has it's own niche, and have more stand alone options, but they are confusing to navigate unless you are in their system a lot. Integration can take a lot more time to do and test out. Plus WePay charges less than PayPal does which in this case is an advantage.

Incentivized

Our tech team implemented payments API to process payments online. Analytics team receives transaction repots that we use to build our own performance dashboards and help to reconcile transactions. API is indeed flexible - we don't use all features but if required we can easily implement them. When Checkout.com adds new features or functionalities, some of them can be used even on an older API version which saved us tech resources and implementation time. We use the same API to expand into new markets - technically we don't need to change anything when we want to launch payments in a new country.

Incentivized

• Checkout has allowed us to enter markets worldwide without having to find a new provider—the same seamless experience across Europe, the UK, and Australia.
• The efficient chargeback setup on the portal allows us to monitor and respond to chargebacks promptly and efficiently, and help is always available for cases that are a little less black or white.

Incentivized

• Cuts down on sales time because Wepay does the approval instantly
• Less return on a per transaction basis because the Wepay fees are pretty high to start with so we can't mark them up too high

Incentivized