TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Claris FileMaker vs. Microsoft Access vs. Microsoft SQL Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Claris FileMaker

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AClaris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.

    $21

    per month per user

    Microsoft Access

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools.

    $139.99

    per PC

    Microsoft SQL Server

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft SQL Server is a relational database.

    $1,418

    Per License

    Pricing
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft SQL Server
    Editions & Modules
    Platform Subscription
    $21
    per month per user
    Individual desktop license
    $594
    one-time fee
    Microsoft Access
    $139.99
    per PC
    Subscription
    $1,418.00
    Per License
    Enterprise
    $13,748.00
    Per License
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft SQL Server
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft SQL Server
    Considered Multiple Products
    Claris
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    I've used Microsoft Access, and it doesn't compare to Filemaker. The Filemaker software system is robust and had the ability to expand and work with other programs. I have a small business, and I can say that for a small to medium sized business, I do not think there is a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    I chose FileMaker over a custom DB with Azure and SQL Server because of the low code nature of FileMaker. And we needed ease of access with Apple products so we didn't use Microsoft Access.
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    1. MYOB has great accounting features but doesn't have the customisability or features to create the business management system that will do what you want it to do. Using a FileMaker Pro solution for business management and MYOB/XERO for the accounting is a great combination.
    2. Micro…
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    Access is very complex leading to longer deployment, more user training, and therefore higher costs. Caspio is decent but quite limited in its native ability.
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    FileMaker Pro is the chaotic, cumbersome and non-integratable little sibling of MS Access. And even MS Access can't be taken serious in a medium sized company. FileMaker Pro can not even be compared to serious products like OutSystems and Sitecore. It's also not free... whereas …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    I haven't used another product like FileMaker Pro. Previously (at other jobs), I would email my needs to our maintenance and catering staff.
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    Unlike traditional databases, you get an all inclusive solution which allows end-user screens and workflows which can be developed via scripting. With the exception of SQL Server, Filemaker also allows you to setup scheduled scripts which can run on a recurring basis. In …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    I am now using WORKetc for my CRM, and there are more benefits to me and my business using this software than using FileMaker Pro.
    WORK Etc Benefits: CloudBase, App, Email Response Update Project Automatically, Invoicing, Reports, Tags, Some quick add features
    Work Etc. Cons: …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    Some developers really like Visual FoxPro - but it has been discontinued by Microsoft and is no longer supported.

    FileMaker offers improved developer productivity.
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    The most direct competitor to FileMaker Pro is Microsoft Access. If you understand the way Microsoft Access works, then you can probably get more functionality and features in Microsoft Access. With that said though, FileMaker is much easier to learn and develop in. I tried …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    I used to work with Access some years ago, and liked the rigid structure. It had rules that were easy to adhere to, and once learnt, it was a powerful way to collect data.

    When I discovered FileMaker, I had to completely unlearn what I had thought were the boundaries of data …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    As compared to other tools, FileMaker is a more robust and backwards compatible tool. As a product is always has had a stability that is unseen. I have developed solution over the years that even after 15 years are still used and loved by customers. As compared to programming …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    I compared FileMaker to Microsoft Access - and am so pleased I selected FileMaker - it was a clear choice to create a database - provide management tools within the database to some users and then give access to many users through the web interface. With Microsoft or other …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    FileMaker was so much easier to use and much more flexible. I tried creating a database in access and just got frustrated. In the early 1990's my boss loaded FileMaker 2.0 on my computer & told me to see what I could do with it. With no formal programming training, I created …
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    Access is similar to Filemaker but has several disadvantages.
    - no mobile app access
    - not cross platform (only supports windows)
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    Any software suite that has database functionality. i.e. MS Access, InfoPath
    Incentivized
    Chose Claris FileMaker
    1. Microsoft Access - No contest
    2. QuickBooks - as a front end to QuickBooks, no contest compared to other solutions on the market
    3. SQL - No contest for ease of use and single tool functionality for building front- and back-ends that work on all devices
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Visual FoxPro is a discontinued software, and no longer has support. Also, very few people still use it, or ever know how to use it. Excel is very popular, but [Microsoft] Access can do things like data joins much easier and faster
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Although SQL is a full-blown platform for heavy database management, Microsoft Access serves the purpose perfectly for small and mid-scale enterprises. It is also perfect for people just getting started with database management. The graphical user interface is a major plus …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Unlike enterprise-level databases, MS Access doesn't require setting up a complex server environment with user security schemes. It's an excellent tool for small scale databases where purchasing and setting up a product like MS SQL Server could be an overkill. Unlike …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Microsoft Access is a bit dated compared to other database tools. It is slower, not able to handle quantities of data that are as large as the other tools, and a bit more finicky. However, it is sometimes the preferred tool for some clients. It also has a lower barrier to entry …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    FileMaker Pro focuses more on data collection in a single, flat file while Access allows for relationships to be drawn between data tables the reduces duplication. I have not worked with FileMaker Pro for several years but found it to be very unwieldy for my needs which were …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    MS Access is the little brother to all these products. In no way is it as feature-rich as the competition I have selected. It is, however, great when used properly. It does not have the same level of security, availability, access, or recoverability as anything listed above. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    FileMaker is much more robust for sharing amongst users. However, Microsoft has proven useful in its availability to our user base as well as helping drive complex needs to a centralized solution.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Access is more robust than Excel in terms of data-centricity and robustness. It however isn't meant to support an enterprise-level use case like SQL Server is. That sweet spot in the middle (a departmental solution that requires more than Excel can offer) is the sweet spot for …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    Microsoft Access while a data tool cannot scale to number of concurrent users or the great amount of files needed to run a business. Microsoft Access can attach to sql server as a backend but the interface is still limited to less than 20 concurrent users at a time.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    Microsoft SQL is slower than MySQL and Access but far more feature-rich and reliable. Access is almost obsolete nowadays, so not too many people are considering it, but unless budget or an open-source ethos is a factor, Microsoft SQL is superior in every way. Many commonly used …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    All of the platforms have their own benefit. I was not the decision maker in selecting Microsoft SQL Server, as it was already being utilized when I joined the company, 7 years ago. I can say that I feel more comfortable with utilizing this platform as opposed to the other ones.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    The free version is very powerfull and easy to install and use for small companies.
    Going to Professional and Standard, gives you all the support and the flexibility needed. It is known within the Database Administrator crew, and you can get support very easily over the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    SQL server is a better software because of its support by Microsoft and it's data table pop up function. Also it has pivot function that others lack.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    I use Crystal and Microsoft SQL Server with each other. Each has a unique role that it brings to every query. Microsoft SQL Server allows me to write and refine my base query. Crystal allows me to take that query and make it more visually appealing and easier to interpret.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    SQL Server is a better choice for quick time to market solutions and for easier maintenance. Oracle Database setup and programming to support solutions has a harder learning curve and it requires more time and effort to hit the ground running.

    An organization having invested …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    Access is simply too small and the options too slim for our current needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    Years ago I used Oracle and Oracle Data Integrator and I hated it. It was cumbersome and archaic and I couldn't believe the product could be so popular. Given a database related task and a choice between Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server, SQL Server wins hands down in ease of use, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    I have used Microsoft Access, MySQL, and I have been a user of systems that run on Oracle database servers. All but Oracle are really intended for smaller scale projects and teams as they start to get slow or the performance will suffer once you start getting lots of data input …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft SQL Server
    I started working with databases many years ago with Access, which allows you to create relational database and provide an old-fashioned desktop interface. I had a look at Oracle but I never had the opportunity to get to the bottom (also because of the budget that had the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    93%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    29 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    53 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    29 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    45 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    53 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    19 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    39 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    45 Answers
    Features
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft SQL Server
    Low-Code Development
    Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Claris FileMaker and Microsoft Access and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    Claris FileMaker
    7.9
    4 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Microsoft Access
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Visual Modeling8.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Drag-and-drop Interfaces3.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Security9.83 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform User Management7.54 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reusability8.64 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Scalability9.64 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Relational Databases
    Comparison of Relational Databases features of Claris FileMaker and Microsoft Access and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    Claris FileMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Access
    7.7
    3 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    ACID compliance00 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database monitoring00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database locking00 Ratings8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Encryption00 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Disaster recovery00 Ratings7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple datatypes00 Ratings8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft SQL Server
    Small Businesses
    Zoho Creator
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Amazon RDS
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Amazon RDS
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AppSheet
    Score8.2 out of 10
    SingleStore
    Score8.2 out of 10
    SingleStore
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Oracle APEX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    SAP IQ
    Score5.4 out of 10
    SAP IQ
    Score5.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft SQL Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (51 ratings)
    7.4
    (102 ratings)
    7.9
    (107 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.0
    (7 ratings)
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (8 ratings)
    7.6
    (8 ratings)
    7.6
    (17 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (6 ratings)
    6.4
    (5 ratings)
    7.9
    (26 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Claris FileMakerMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft SQL Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Claris
    If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    As a Material Purchasing/Planning/inventory tracking application, Microsoft Access serves its purpose well. It's presentation is clean, data entry is simple and the ability to customize search fields is welcome. It does, however, come with some caveats; namely, when setting search filters and the need arises to back up a step or two, with Microsoft Access you have to reset, or "clear all", adding extra steps/time to a query.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft SQL is ubiquitous, while MySQL runs under the hood all over the place. Microsoft SQL is the platform taught in colleges and certification courses and is the one most likely to be used by businesses because it is backed by Microsoft. Its interface is friendly (well, as pleasant as SQL can be) and has been used by so many for so long that resources are freely available if you encounter any issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Claris
    • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
    • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
    • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
    • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Very easy to create entity-relationship diagrams for various tables and designing mock layouts.
    • Really easy to navigate as it hold[s] the classic Microsoft UI. Another good thing is that it comes with the complete MS Office Suite.
    • It is really fast when joining multiple tables no matter what type of join.
    • Works on pretty much same SQL scripts so no need to learn a new language!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Easy to configure and use with Visual Studio and Dot Net
    • Easy integration with MSBI to perform data analysis
    • Data Security
    • Easy to understand and use
    • Very easy to export database and tables in the form of SQL query or a script
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Claris
    • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
    • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
    • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft Access has not really changed at all for several years. It might be nice to see some upgrades and changes.
    • The help info is often not helpful. Need more tutorials for Microsoft Access to show how to do specific things.
    • Be careful naming objects such as tables, forms, etc. Names that are too long can get cut off in dialog boxes to choose a table, form, report, etc. So, I wish they would have resizable dialog boxes to allow you to see objects with long names.
    • I wish it could show me objects that are not in use in the database for current queries, tables, reports, forms, and macros. That way unused objects can be deleted without worrying about losing a report or query because you deleted the underlying object.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise edition has a high cost but is the only edition which supports SQL Always On Availability Groups. It would be nice to include this feature in the Standard version.
    • Licensing of Microsoft SQL Server is a quite complex matter, it would be good to simplify licensing in the future. For example, per core vs per user CAL licensing, as well as complex licensing scenarios in the Cloud and on Edge locations.
    • It would be good to include native tools for converting Oracle, DB2, Postgresql and MySQL/MariaDB databases (schema and data) for import into Microsoft SQL Server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Claris
    It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I and the rest of my team will renew our Microsoft Access in the future because we use and maintain many different applications and databases created using Microsoft Access so we will need to maintain them in the future. Additionally, it is a standard at our place of work so it is at $0 cost to us to use. Another reason for renewing Microsoft Access is that we just don' t have the resources needed to extend into a network of users so we need to remain a single-desktop application at this time.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We understand that the Microsoft SQL Server will continue to advance, offering the same robust and reliable platform while adding new features that enable us, as a software center, to create a superior product. That provides excellent performance while reducing the hardware requirements and the total cost of ownership of our solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Claris
    It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Access is easy to use. It is compatible with spreadsheets. It is a very good data management tool. There is scope to save a large amount of data in one place. For using this database, one does not need much training, can be shared among multiple users. This database has to sort and filtering features which seem to be very useful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    SQL Server mostly 'just works' or generates error messages to help you sort out the trouble. You can usually count on the product to get the job done and keep an eye on your potential mistakes. Interaction with other Microsoft products makes operating as a Windows user pretty straight forward. Digging through the multitude of dialogs and wizards can be a pain, but the answer is usually there somewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Claris
    mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I don't think the program has ever failed me. It is one of those programs where there is always a solution if you know where to look.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Its does not have outages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Claris
    for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    SSAS data cubes may some time slow down your Excel reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Claris
    The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    While I have never contacted Microsoft directly for product support, for some reason there's a real prejudice against MS Access among most IT support professionals. They are usually discouraging when it comes to using MS Access. Most of this is due to their lack of understanding of MS Access and how it can improve one's productivity. If Microsoft invested more resources towards enhancing and promoting the use of MS Access then maybe things would be different.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We managed to handle most of our problems by looking into Microsoft's official documentation that has everything explained and almost every function has an example that illustrates in detail how a particular functionality works. Just like PowerShell has the ability to show you an example of how some cmdlet works, that is the case also here, and in my opinion, it is a very good practice and I like it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Claris
    easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It was good
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Claris
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    very hands on and detailed training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Claris
    Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    there is no key idea, since it is easy to implement Microsoft Access
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Other than SQL taking quite a bit of time to actually install there are no problems with installation. Even on hardware that has good performance SQL can still take close to an hour to install a typical server with management and reporting services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Claris
    FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Excel is a fantastic - robust application that can do so much so easily. Its easy to train and understand. However - excel does not provide a reporting function and that is typically where we will suggest a move to [Microsoft] Access. [Microsoft] Access requires a little more knowledge of data manipulation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    [Microsoft] SQL Server has a much better community and professional support and is overall just a more reliable system with Microsoft behind it. I've used MySQL in the past and SQL Server has just become more comfortable for me and is my go to RDBMS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Claris
    it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    SQL server does handle growing demands of a mid sized company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Claris
    • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Not having to recreate queries or reports every time you want to use them.
    • Once an item is created and saved as part of the database, you save manpower by not having to recreate them.
    • ROI from a usability standpoint is great. Solid product with great functionality that requires low maintenance usually.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Increased accuracy - We went from multiple users having different versions of an Excel spreadsheet to a single source of truth for our reporting.
    • Increased Efficiency - We can now generate reports at any time from a single source rather than multiple users spending their time collating data and generating reports.
    • Improved Security - Enterprise level security on a dedicated server rather than financial files on multiple laptop hard drives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots