Contractor Foreman vs. WorkflowMax

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contractor Foreman
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
WorkflowMax
Score 8.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
WorkflowMax is a web-based project management solution.The platform offers end-to-end functionality standard to project management software, including time tracking, lead management, collaboration with external stakeholders, invoicing, integrations, and customizable reporting.
$20
per month
Pricing
Contractor ForemanWorkflowMax
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Standard
$20
per month
Standard
$35
per month
Premium
$70
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor ForemanWorkflowMax
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPlans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor ForemanWorkflowMax
Considered Both Products
Contractor Foreman
Chose Contractor Foreman
A few of them were too specialized, and we're trying to limit the amount of software we have data entry into. BuilderTrend was probably the biggest competitor we reviewed, but the cost and migration effort didn't seem enticing to us as a business. I think Contractor Foreman has …
Chose Contractor Foreman
It has the best features, is user-friendly, does everything I need it to and then some, and is affordable.
Chose Contractor Foreman
CF is much friendlier to customization and much more robust.
Chose Contractor Foreman
I would say the biggest reason the company went with the items available on Contractor Foreman and the cost of the program for our group.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman has it all, we don't need to use different systems other than our accounting software, Quickbooks
Chose Contractor Foreman
We demoed at least 6 other software suites and not met that customizability and affordability of Contractor Foreman.
Chose Contractor Foreman
While procore is great for creating take offs and finding projects, Contractor Foreman just has more features.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Everything in Houzz Pro is designed to look beautiful for the client. It’s "high-end" and "boutique." If your business is 80% aesthetic consultation, it’s a winner. If your business is 80% hammers and nails, it feels a bit "fragile." The interface isn't as "slick" as Houzz, …
Chose Contractor Foreman
We switched from Houzz Pro which was a decent program, alot more user friendly but it always felt like there was a glitch or that nothing worked right. As if nothing was ever finished being put together. We have kept them for their 3d renderings and mood boards but don't use …
Chose Contractor Foreman
They are very similar except CoConstruct allows for more selections of a customer. This is more for a company who doesn’t deal with interior designers as often who control the specs of the job. Most everything else was able to be done. I like the estimates sections and …
Chose Contractor Foreman
The communication within CF is not as reliable as I would like it to be. We communicate on teams internally to make sure all of the information is translated properly. Within CF, we rely on multiple positions to add details to a project. Attempting to compile everything within …
Chose Contractor Foreman
We considered Houzz Pro but when we looked at all the features that Contractor Foreman offered along with its pricing we decided that Contractor Foreman was better value for money and a better fit for the business.
Chose Contractor Foreman
We evaluated Procore before choosing Contractor Foreman. Procore is a strong platform but was too expensive for our type of projects and company size. Contractor Foreman offers most of the same essential features — such as project management, daily reports, and cost tracking — …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman has better integration for commercial projects - Buildertrend focuses on residential construction. Contractor Foreman is relatively cost comparable with Buildertrend, but is better suited for the work we do.
Chose Contractor Foreman
More integration across the company which helps with system processes
Chose Contractor Foreman
We started with ServiceTitan since it was our industry's standard. But it was far too complicated, and the implementation was not efficient. We gave it a solid try, but after many attempts to try and understand the system, we decided to find something different.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman is by far less of a major corporation selling a software and more of a personalized experience with people who truly care. Houzz Pro does have some great features, but the lack of the same service definitely hinders it in my option.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Procore is a better product, slicker and with better drawing storage but the cost made it ridiculous ofr a company our size
Chose Contractor Foreman
Combines everything into one software. CRM, Estimating, Project Management, Job Costing all in one. We prefer to train people on one software rather than several. When everyone is using the same program it's easier for team collaboration. It also eliminates the excuse the I …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Monday.com was limited and I noticed myself integrating other programs rather than just using Monday.com I used Zoho at a sales company and it was fine for that. One of my friends uses Zoho for HVAC and I liked the Contractor Foreman interface better.
WorkflowMax
Chose WorkflowMax
It was overwhelming to configure ConnectWise Manage and was pricey compared to WorkflowMax, which was well embraced by all our employees.
Chose WorkflowMax
I think workflowmax does a little more than Thomson Reuters workflow because they have the additional feature of employee tracking for payroll use. Thomson Reuters does a good job at getting a project from start to finish, but workflowmax gives better reports and allows more …
Chose WorkflowMax
Loan Assistant is a virtual business, entirely operated in the cloud. We do not have an office. Team members are located in diverse locations such as Munich, Canada and Sri Lanka as well as various locations in Australia. WorkflowMax is what ties us together. The fact that the …
Chose WorkflowMax
I'm not sure if it was by Ascentis or not, and it may have been an old version, but we used a program called Timekeeper. It was very outdated, difficult to use, and didn't provide easily producible reports. WorkflowMax is infinitely better to use for our business.
Chose WorkflowMax
I made comparisons with two Legal Practice Management systems, InfinityLaw and OneLaw. These systems were more expensive and had functionality/modules which we did not require. I am experienced with WorkflowMax so that was a key factor, along with pricing. I also felt it was …
Chose WorkflowMax
It's been so many years now I don't remember. I haven't needed to look anywhere else. I'm happy with WorkflowMax.
Chose WorkflowMax
Not as easily configured for the architecture and design field.
Chose WorkflowMax
I chose WorkflowMax because it seamlessly integrated with my accounting system Xero
Chose WorkflowMax
We tried a couple of solutions before settling on WorkflowMax, we chose WorkflowMax for as it did what we needed without being over complicated.

Chose WorkflowMax
WorkflowMax is much much easier than Streamtime, much more affordable and easier to try out and see if it meets your needs. Streamtime is a great comprehensive product but we lost a year's subscription in investment because we couldn't get answers to the support questions we …
Chose WorkflowMax
WorkflowMax was the first program I evaluated and it suited our business from the word go. There was no need to look elsewhere.
Chose WorkflowMax
Archioffice is clunky by comparison and quite regimented in what you can do or not. WorkflowMax offers quite a high degree of flexibility by comparison. Neither offers perfect graphics for invoice presentation (yet) whereas WorkflowMax's is quite acceptable or presentable. AO …
Chose WorkflowMax
I didn't get an option in the menu above for JobBag which was the previous system we used. My IT/production manager heard of WorkflowMax and invited the team to do a presentation. JobBag was not fulfilling our needs and we also wanted to move to a cloud-based system which could …
Chose WorkflowMax
I have only used Synergy and whilst this is good, the cost of Synergy was far too great for my practice.
Chose WorkflowMax
We trialed several time tracking options, WorkflowMax won as it was the most feature rich, allowed us to take up additional users as our business grew and plugs directly into Xero, allowing for a reduction in number of hours spent in the land of accounting.
Chose WorkflowMax
The previous programs I used are not listed. But having had to use two different programs to store client data and one for doing the quoting and invoicing was very time consuming. Client details and job details needed to be recorded in both programs, so multiple entries of data …
Chose WorkflowMax
In terms of CRM I always found Capsule to be clunky and difficult to use. WorkflowMax makes it easy for me to gather all the relevant info about our clients in one place with the document manager and also the custom fields that we can add in. I have been able to analyse where …
Chose WorkflowMax
More comprehensive than both of the above - better reporting, more flexible, better customisation.
Features
Contractor ForemanWorkflowMax
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.6
Ratings
8% above category average
WorkflowMax
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
5.9
Ratings
15% below category average
WorkflowMax
-
Ratings
Pay calculation4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors3.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
8% above category average
WorkflowMax
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
8.9
Ratings
13% above category average
WorkflowMax
-
Ratings
Dashboards9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
8.0
Ratings
8% above category average
WorkflowMax
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
WorkflowMax
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
WorkflowMax
9.3
Ratings
19% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
WorkflowMax
9.5
Ratings
21% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contractor ForemanWorkflowMax
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Contractor ForemanWorkflowMax
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
1.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Contractor ForemanWorkflowMax
Likelihood to Recommend
If we are working with an architect on a highly complex, custom-built home that requires 50 versions of a floor plan. The Limitation: While Contractor Foreman handles documents well, it isn't a dedicated "Blueprinting" or CAD-markup tool like Procore or specialized architectural software. If the job is more "design" than "construction," the tool's document versioning can feel a bit basic. The Scenario: A crew leader identifies $1,200 in structural repairs needed before the new siding can go up. The Contractor Foreman Solution: Instead of "calling the office" and waiting, the lead creates a Change Order on their tablet, attaches a photo of the rot, and has the homeowner sign it on the spot. The project doesn't stop, and the billing is updated automatically.
Read full review
WorkflowMax is a good solution for the architecture and design profession in that it allows for multiple ways to track a project, apply time to a project, and invoice against a project. The ability to do staffing forecasting and future planning fills a need that most firms in this profession require.
Read full review
Pros
  • The service is top notch. You would be hard pressed to find other options with this kind of service.
  • The ability to have your project flow through the modules makes it a breeze to use.
  • Being able to track time as well is a key feature.
Read full review
  • Great for managing teams which are not in one spot. Awesome for small or growing businesses with employees who might work from home.
  • Really good for teams to keep up with where a project is at against the time left to achieve the goal
  • Great for keeping all the information for each project in one spot.
Read full review
Cons
  • In the CDB, I'd like to be able to create a line item with a specified percentage, and when I pull that line item into an estimate or proposal, I'd like the system to automatically calculate it based on that contract value. (Example, Contingency line is always going to be 15% of the contract value).
  • I'd like to be able to rearrange "blocks" on a page when I'm getting ready to send or print it. Lots of dead space on pages. Estimates 4 pages in total when it could be 2.
  • I'd like to be able to create budget summaries. Where the line items are grouped into their respective master format categories, and the category has the sum of all the line items in that category.
Read full review
  • Integration with inventory - there are a lot of companies out there which provide a service which includes selling items either purchased or held in stock or "kitted"
  • User permission levels need to be more flexible and ideally closely tied to Xero
  • Two way integration with Xero - ability to import invoices to specific jobs
  • Ability to save pdfs to purchase orders, invoices (like Xero)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have compiled so much information on CF it would be counterproductive to move to another software. We have also sold a lot of clients on the client portal feature. It is crucial for our communication between customers. The only reason we wouldn't renew the service is if somewhere offered the exact same service but at a lower cost
Read full review
Because we can't imagine being without it!
Read full review
Usability
The platform is straightforward for basic use, the more advanced features, like budgeting, scheduling and QuickBooks integration, require some time to learn, and there are some growing pains with the occasional bugs and the need for better security features. CF is a great tool for efficiently managing construction projects, tracking progress, and handling finances in small to mid-sized construction businesses, but it may not meet the needs of highly complex projects or those requiring extensive customization.
Read full review
It's easy to use and provides me with instant online access to the management of my business whether I am at my desk or overseas
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Availability was good, FUNCTIONAL availability was more spotty
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We have only had one issue the entire time we have had Contractor Foreman and that was that we had the hardest time getting the platform to allow us to log in, but we called our support and within 5 mins we able to log back in
Read full review
We have had very few issues with Max
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The team that does your implementation is amazing. They're skillful, kind, they will take as much time as you need, and they have a sense of urgency
Read full review
Decide how to breakdown your ongoing jobs - are they monthly recurring or annual broken into chunks? What are you going to give clients i.e. how will your proposals and invoices look?
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
A few of them were too specialized, and we're trying to limit the amount of software we have data entry into. Buildertrend was probably the biggest competitor we reviewed, but the cost and migration effort didn't seem enticing to us as a business. I think Contractor Foreman has its own quirks, but once you understand the methodology behind the software, it works very well, and at the price, it's hard to imagine migrating away to something that does the exact same thing for 2-3x the cost (plus all the data migration).
Read full review
I'm not sure if it was by Ascentis or not, and it may have been an old version, but we used a program called Timekeeper. It was very outdated, difficult to use, and didn't provide easily producible reports. WorkflowMax is infinitely better to use for our business.
Read full review
Scalability
We had just 2 users
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We were able to find a 18,000 change order that been signed but not billed. Contractor Foreman was great because we were able to find the discrepancy but it also would not have happened if the "billed" button made more sense in functionality.
Read full review
  • The time the company saves by using employees efficiently on each project makes the purchase of this software worthwhile. You can clearly verify how much time the staff spends on each project, with each client, and you can compare whether it is profitable or not the hours invested, thus increasing your profits.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Contractor Foreman Screenshots

Screenshot of The client portal that lets customers to stay in the loop and know what is going on during all phases of the project.Screenshot of The custom dashboard which allows users to see the data that matters most to them.Screenshot of Stats that keep users informed to help them make use of data.Screenshot of The lead manager, that helps close deals without letting leads fall through the cracks.Screenshot of the Files & Photos screen, where making up plans can be done with Contractor Foreman.Screenshot of Time Cards, that display who is where and what they are doing.

WorkflowMax Screenshots

Screenshot of WorkflowMax Quoting SoftwareScreenshot of WorkflowMax CRM SoftwareScreenshot of WorkflowMax Project Management SoftwareScreenshot of WorkflowMax Mobile SiteScreenshot of Job Costing | WorkflowMaxScreenshot of Powerful Custom Reporting | WorkflowMax