Crunchbase is a provider of private-company prospecting and research solutions. The vendor boasts that over 60 million users—including salespeople, entrepreneurs, investors, and market researchers—use Crunchbase to prospect for new business opportunities, and that companies all over the world rely on Crunchbase to power their applications, making over 3 billion calls to their API each year.
$0
DiscoverOrg (discontinued)
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Capabilities of the former DiscoverOrg product are now supplied by ZoomInfo, since the merger of DiscoverOrg and ZoomInfo into a single brand in 2019.
N/A
Pricing
Crunchbase
DiscoverOrg (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Crunchbase Starter
$29
per month, per user
Crunchbase Pro
$49
per month, per user
Crunchbase Enterprise
Custom Billing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Crunchbase
DiscoverOrg (discontinued)
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Crunchbase
DiscoverOrg (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Crunchbase
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Crunchbase
It has more data and it's for sure more accurate, Crunchbase has a better platform when talking about visual and it's also easier to search. Also, it has better filters which can help companies to dive deeper into researching accordingly to their needs
I like Pitchbook a lot -- but too expensive for a slight difference in our use case. If Crunchbase added valuation "estimates" (kind of like zillow "zestimates"), it would be awesome instead of just very good.
Ptichbook. This platform is more detailed and has a lot more information regarding round details. The platform also has other features to build lists, market maps, landscapes and access reports and raw data about companies by vertical or any other segmentation. Also provides …
Crunchbase is definitely bottom of the barrel in this space. At similar pricing models, all competitors I have tried have significantly bigger and more updated databases. Crunchbase may have been great sometime in the past, but they are not worth engaging now.
Crunchbase is the best resource for prospecting startups hands down. TechTarget has a lot of useful info, but I found it to be inaccurate where it mattered most. Crunchbase's data seems more accurate, and is also easier to use. Not the most exact comparison, but they offer …
Sales Navigator is better only because it provides you with more direct contacts to reach out to. Crunchbase only tells you really the top dogs in the company like c-level execs, not necessarily contacts that you would be having sales conversations with.
Crunchbase has far more company data than LinkedIn Sales Navigator. The thing that it lacks is data on the people at those companies. LinkedIn Sales Navigator also has a better CRM integration, from what I understand. It is more automated. For our strategy, we use both of these …
This question always gets me. In a world with so many database solutions, it becomes quite difficult to compare, its the subtleties. Bigger is usually better...Crunchbase has gone through over 300...300 rounds of funding. In a world where there are so many options, going with …
I don't know of other services like Crunchbase, in my mind it stands alone. Of course I could use FormDs, but it's cumbersome and doesn't provide the same level of information, so I rarely use it.
datafox - has better company data, but no contacts, technology data was about the same duns-bradstreet - good company data, ZoomInfo company data is not as accurate
ZoomInfo acquired DiscoverOrg and I believe legacy DiscoverOrg will phase out in the near future. ZoomInfo is 100x better than DiscoverOrg and are very pleased with it's functionality and easy of use. We only selected DiscoverOrg because we were on an auto-renewal contract and …
We have recently switched over to ZoomInfo and I believe that Zoominfo is the superior sales intelligence tool. They have a larger database with more accurate data as well as additional features, such as form complete and websites.
Our firm specializes in working with advertising/marketing agencies, where Winmo is a dominant sales intelligence tool. DiscoverOrg has more extensive company and prospect data, especially in B2B and pharma industries. However, Winmo has more extensive CPG data, and partnership …
DiscoverOrg stand at top and ZoomInfo is also good, but the recent acquisition of it by DiscoverOrg doesn't leave any doubt not to use DiscoverOrg. DiscoverOrg has the best data in terms of companies and also with different locations( depends on which country/territory your …
DiscoverOrg is enterprise-level ready - from its detailed filtering, sales-minded UI/UX, amazing CSM's and AM's, easy SFDC integration, to automatically updating your sales databases with better contact information.
data.com and Zoom Info have integrated with DiscoverOrg. Now DiscoverOrg is much more expensive, but the data is very similar to data.com/Zoom Info. What you are paying for is the ease of use and some perks like having some LinkedIn URLs available in DiscoverOrg. When all is …
Previously, DiscoverOrg fell behind LeadIq on the user-friendliness and breadth of the information side. After merging with Zoominfo, I must say that Zoominfo plus DiscoverOrg cannot be beaten. They have a very slick user interface, contact information for companies as small as …
We reviewed one of their competitors but DiscoverOrg's user interface, their amount of contact and account data, and their overall ease of use were all reasons we went with them. They were a little more expensive but having access to intent keyword data and org charts is what …
We use Lead Forensics for tracking site visits and have seen contact data available in the LF system. Not sure how to validate the data LF is providing, so we've elected to stick with DiscoverOrg with regard to data sources, and are interested in site visit tracking as well.
So we switched from ZoomInfo to DiscoverOrg before they merged into one company. Now both solutions are combined, so there is not a multitude of vendors in the data/sales intelligence space. Originally we switched off ZoomInfo because we didn't like their "tokens for lead" …
Depending on the field you are in that is why you choose DiscoverOrg. For HR department information, DiscoverOrg definitely had the best content and information but if you are looking for more healthcare based then Definitive might be the way to go. I would recommend getting a …
In my previous position (not at this company) I exclusively used Raiser's Edge (and Raiser's Edge NXT). I still work within the nonprofit world and find both of these tools useful. In my current position however, it makes more sense to use Hubspot CRM and DiscoverOrg rather …
DiscoverOrg stacks up well against both tools as it is much faster to download lists, more accurate information, easier to use interface as it relates to accessing the lists that come through. With this tool compared to InsideView we were able to save the most time and saw the …
DiscoverOrg has always been a favorite of mine, I am daily on the tool to prospect to contact and to call into or email. Finding out budget or scoop (since the acquisition of Ranking is very good, even though I feel that the integration is not as good as when the tools were …
Quite frankly, based on my usage, the information at ZoomInfo was typically more accurate than the information at DiscoverOrg. Now that DiscoverOrg has acquired ZoomInfo, perhaps the accuracy of the data will improve.
They're for different use cases. As I explained before, DiscoverOrg has the most information in general. So if you are looking for leads in a wide set of industries, and a wide set of roles and levels within a company, DiscoverOrg is the best bet for that. If you have a …
The data is outdated and has significant gaps. It is mostly a replication of what is easily and publicly available, with little value added. Their predatory subscription model includes no notice of renewal and they are very antagonistic towards their customers.
Uses [of DiscoverOrg] include searching for prospects in accounts. Getting all of the relevant contact information in one place. Using the export button saves time by allowing you to select one or more leads to import into CRM. Sophisticated search allows for you to build lists, and export as above. Good support with various experts available to help you get started and get better at using it.
Account-Based Data. Employee range, website, industry, company description, chief executives, latest news, etc. All for the given company you are researching.
Salesforce integration. I have not used it, but the functionality is supposed to be great. You can run data enrichment in your CRM with the Crunchbase data.
Funding, mergers, and acquisitions data. Crunchbase has relationships with thousands of VC firms throughout the world and followup with each very regularly to be able to serve up the latest data to their users.
Tech integrations. Integrations with tools like Bombora, Builtwith, Siftery, and others are really useful because you can use Crunchbase's company profile-based research method, and see the data from these tools specifically related to the given company.
DiscoverOrg is very good at account and contacts information. Their detail information are very accurate and relevant. This is the strength of DiscoverOrg.
DiscoverOrg is great at providing direct phone numbers of your target contacts with ultimate accuracy, this is also a strength of DiscoverOrg.
DiscoverOrg dashboards and reports features are just amazing and very informative. This is also a strength of DiscoverOrg.
Improvement on the search capabilities - since there is so much to search (which is a plus) it makes it harder to do this in a timely manner. You have to dedicate a certain amount of time to be able to pull a proper, useful and clean list.
Make it more user friendly - there are so many different tabs, search buttons, pull down, etc. I think it can be quite confusing to a new user.
The tool is simply better than most other lead/company data repositories, and they are dedicated to keeping their data clean, even if they are far from accomplishing this task at present. The tool works, and it is relatively easy to use. Overall, DiscoverOrg provides the level of lead/contact, customer, and even industry level data the sales orgs have come to expect from this sort of tool in a format that is fairly easy to use. They do also provide support for sales teams looking to use the tool effectively, which is great!
In our experience, the customer service is horrible to non existent. If we were a fortune 100 company with a staff of computer people I am sure this would be a valuable service as they would "speak the language" but that is not us. Not being able to reach customer service when we are thinking about upgrading is, in my opinion, a crazy business model.
They give standard answers. They are not a customer first business. I tried to cancel my subscription after using it for only 1 week as we found the information was outdated and not at all useful. But they would not cancel the year long subscription I mistakenly signed up for
Ptichbook. This platform is more detailed and has a lot more information regarding round details. The platform also has other features to build lists, market maps, landscapes and access reports and raw data about companies by vertical or any other segmentation. Also provides emails on c-suite. Crunchbase however is an easier tool to use so if complicated segmentation is not required, Crunchabse is a great solution. It's also super fast to access and provides a succinct and easy to read profile view.
ZoomInfo acquired DiscoverOrg and I believe legacy DiscoverOrg will phase out in the near future. ZoomInfo is 100x better than DiscoverOrg and are very pleased with it's functionality and easy of use. We only selected DiscoverOrg because we were on an auto-renewal contract and did not unsubscribe in time. We did not plan to renew DiscoverOrg. But since then we have been upgraded to ZoomInfo and are finding much more value in that platform than we did in DiscoverOrg.
DiscoverOrg has had a positive impact on prospecting for the sales teams. It's increased efficiencies to be able to create a list of 1000s in less than 2 mins. It's been able to increase our number/rate of outreach, reduce time to prospect & increased our sales velocity to generate opportunities at a faster rate.
The negative impact it has had on our team is that the sale team cannot use DiscoverOrg and it has to be used through our sales ops team because of permission issues/access issues.
The ability to reach a large list of prospects has provided an ROI. We are getting a Return on Investment. I just am not the one who manages the costs so don't know to what extent it's paid for itself.