Firebase vs. WatchGuard AuthPoint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Firebase
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Firebase suite of application development tools, available free or at cost for higher degree of usages, priced flexibly accorded to features needed. The suite includes A/B testing and Crashlytics, Cloud Messaging (FCM) and in-app messaging, cloud storage and NoSQL storage (Cloud Firestore and Firestore Realtime Database), and other features supporting developers with flexible mobile application development.
$0.01
Per Verification
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
AuthPoint Total Identity Security provides businesses with a solution to protect user accounts and credentials. With multi-factor authentication and dark web credential monitoring, AuthPoint mitigates the risks associated with workforce credential attacks. AuthPoint adds an extra layer of security by monitoring for potential credential exposure in the dark web for both personal and corporate accounts.N/A
Pricing
FirebaseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Editions & Modules
Phone Authentication
$0.01
Per Verification
Stored Data
$0.18
Per GiB
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FirebaseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FirebaseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Considered Both Products
Firebase
Chose Firebase
I actually only have experience with Firebase. It's for a good reason. It's the first database I worked with and just stuck with it. It's beginner friendly while offering advanced tool.
Chose Firebase
Firebase provides an event based data model with well defined pre-determined dimensions. Where I've seen the strength of other platforms is the user interface where data is analyzed. However, other platforms such as AEP also have advanced data cleansing and standardization …
Chose Firebase
Supabase is more user-friendly especially since it is directly integrated with Lovable, one of the most popular AI coder for non-technical users.
Chose Firebase
Supabase seems to have the best of all worlds right now. Followed by MongoDB/Firebase for smaller projects requiring less manpower and resources. Azure and Microsoft are reserved for existing projects and larger corporate clients.
Chose Firebase
Although there are other backend platforms that could have provided us with a solution to our project. The way of grouping the solution in FIREBASE, atomizing in the same project the database, cloud functions, authentication, push notifications, etc., has given us a clearer …
Chose Firebase
Unlike other tools in the GCP suite that have an equivalent in other clouds such as Bigquery (Athenas on AWS), AI Platform (Sagemaker), Storage (S3), we do not find an equivalent as complete as Firebase in any other provider. This is the main reason why we chose this provider …
Chose Firebase
Firebase came to a multiuse case for our product for authenticating backend services, users on the app & get data on the user base using the dashboard.
Chose Firebase
Firebase has a single NoSQL database, it is a simple, powerful and uniform application development platform in connectors, it has multiple programming languages ​​such as JavaScript and necessary tools that will simplify the creation of applications.
Chose Firebase
Firebase poses great documentation and integration with Android devices. And it's very good as well for iOS ones. So, for these scenarios, Firebase becomes the ideal ally.
Chose Firebase
It eases the app development process, has an extensive database that allows you to store media files in the cloud, supports robust uploads and downloads, and login authentication on any platform.
Chose Firebase
PostgreSQL is a relational database and is well suited for complex applications, however, Firebase is well suited for light and faster applications.
Chose Firebase
Firebase is easy to manage and scale really well for web application services. It offers better authentication and is easy to implement. For real-time analytics on web applications, it works very well. Firebase offers more features compared to other services especially it can …
Chose Firebase
  • User interface and console are very easy to understand
  • There is no pain in Integration with IOS, Android, and unity platforms
  • Cost-effective
Chose Firebase
We choose Firebase for various reasons:
  • A large set of resources and world-class Google support.
  • Pricing was a larger role in this decision.
Chose Firebase
If I get a suitable budget next year, I'll be switching us to Adobe Analytics. Their app/web tracking and the interface are streets ahead of Firebase.
Chose Firebase
Firebase is a much more comprehensive tool. While Fabric only had user traffic and trends data, it did not have the user communication set of tools. While CleverTap has CRM tools, it does not have tools for developers and product teams. While Adobe Analytics is good with …
Chose Firebase
I haven't played much with Heroku beyond deploying projects from Github. It looks to be very similar in providing a cloud-based platform for developing and deploying web apps as quickly as possible. I would look at comparing both of these before choosing a solution. I am just …
Chose Firebase
We chose Firebase for the following reasons.
  • Online resources.
  • Comes with better support.
Chose Firebase
Before using Firebase, we exclusively used self hosted database services. Using Firebase has allowed us to reduce reliance on single points of failure and systems that are difficult to scale. Additionally, Firebase is much easier to set up and use than any sort of self hosted …
Chose Firebase
Firebase does a lot of things well, but Branch.io does a lot of things great. We originally chose Firebase because it was free, had great crash reporting, and full event tracking. As we began to scale, increase paid marketing spend, and implement features such as journey …
Chose Firebase
It's tough to pick out competitors against Firebase as I'm really unsure and doubt there's another product exactly like it. As mentioned before Firebase literally does everything you can imagine for a mobile application but doesn't get insanely deep in one feature or action. It …
Chose Firebase
Firebase is well suited for projects with simpler database workloads that require its real-time features. For data that is heavily read in real time, it's a great choice and gives developers a lot of features that would have been complicated and time-consuming to build up front …
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
AuthPoint came at a much better price than many of the other competitors.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Using WatchGuard AuthPoint provides an independent layer of restriction with a different vendor than Microsoft. It syncs well with Microsoft active directly and provides a single pane of glass for security insights. It balances security and usability well so that it is easy to …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard is superior in one way that is very important for our small team, and that is price, it is much cheaper than intune. It also offers most of the same suite of features as well as some extra (dark web monitoring is the only one I can think of) however the fact that it …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
I chose Watchguard for the bundle of features and customer support, not to mention the transparency you get with a paid program versus an open-source version. Mainly, I liked having so many of the solutions I needed in one place without having to find separate programs.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint is easier to manage on a company-wide scale than Google Authenticator. We do use AuthPoint in conjunction with the Microsoft Authenticator but for different services. WatchGuard also has other features available, like dark web monitoring and device …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
They are very similar. There are more direct integrations available with Duo.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Google Authenticator
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WG offers some of the best network equipment, it's a no brainer to wrap it all together.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
I really like the ease of use of the WatchGuard AuthPoint and it has been a good move when our previous VPN appliance went out of support. Working with and using the WatchGuard AuthPoint has been a very easy transition and great improvement over the Sonicwall we previously …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
I find that WatchGuard AuthPoint has less interruptions and is much easier to use.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
We use different 2FA providers to secure different things. We are actively using Duo now, as well as WatchGuard AuthPoint. Each provider has different strengths, and you must test the applicability of a service in your own environment.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Started looking at Yubikeys and RSA, but WatchGuard AuthPoint had complete package instead of piecemealing tokens with one vendor and then using softkeys from Microsoft or another vendor.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Easier to use and manage. More straightforward for users
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Fortinet is free for MFA connections as WatchGuard AuthPoint is not.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
NordLayer did not provide the connections we needed, which WatchGuard AuthPoint did, allowing me to sync our on-site devices to the Cloud.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
The biggest reason we selected Watchguard was support. We already use Watchguard firewall products and have received excellent support from our third-party vendor, Watchguard.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
If you already have WatchGuard firewall, this just integrates a lot better than any other product. We tried Microsoft Authenticator but not nearly as seemless for the experience as it is with WatchGuard AuthPoint. It is all built into the same portal as the firewall and can be …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint offer'd functionalities that each of these fell short on. Rather that be pre login MFA or app based support or cost.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Because we have Watchguard Firewall it becomes easier to manage everything in the cloud.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint is less expensive than most competitors, easier to manage through WatchGuard Cloud, and the MFA solutions is rock solid and secure. We do not worry about vulnerabilities with WatchGuard AuthPoint.
Best Alternatives
FirebaseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
IBM Cloud App ID
IBM Cloud App ID
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FirebaseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
5.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FirebaseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Likelihood to Recommend
Firebase should be your first choice if your platform is mobile first. Firebase's mobile platform support for client-side applications is second to none, and I cannot think of a comparable cross-platform toolkit. Firebase also integrates well with your server-side solution, meaning that you can plug Firebase into your existing app architecture with minimal effort.
Firebase lags behind on the desktop, however. Although macOS support is rapidly catching up, full Windows support is a glaring omission for most Firebase features. This means that if your platform targets Windows, you will need to implement the client functionality manually using Firebase's web APIs and wrappers, or look for another solution.
Read full review
We use multiple authenticators at my company. We use WatchGuard AuthPoint just for our VPN for security purposes. The app works very well and over the past year we've only had a handful of issues with the authentication service, and these were resolved relatively quickly. We do have to remind people to enable push notifications from the app, or have the app open when they need to use it to authenticate, otherwise they won't get the push to approve. The biggest issue I've found is that people will forget to do this and then say that the VPN isn't working - the VPN is working, it's just that they didn't get/approve the push from AuthPoint in time.
Read full review
Pros
  • Extremely robust. Has about any tool you can think of under one roof making it extremely useful as a backup platform for data analytics or small teams that need something quickly.
  • Intuitive and easy UI/UX. Being made and owned by Google, you expect nothing less. Very easy to use for anyone that has any marketing or analytical experience especially in Google Analytics (which I just assume all marketers do).
  • Safe, secure, and sturdy. Never need to worry about downtimes or misinformation as it's as clean and safe as it is being run by Google.
  • FREE! What else is there to say. Unless you're an extremely large application handling hundreds of thousands to millions of users, this pay as you go plan will stay free.
Read full review
  • Works well with the free Authpoint client and the OpenVPN clinet.
  • Token management is simple and hosted completely in the cloud to reduce overall complexity
  • Setup was simple and and staighforward
  • Suppports several authentication methods we have used both RADIUS and SAML effectively, but ADFS, IDP, RDWeb, and RESTful API, and other custom apps are supported.
  • Geofencing for RDP has been very useful as it is independant of our firewall geofencing. This is quite useful for organizations like us who do not Geofence at at the firewall level so as to provide global access to resources on the DMZ.
Read full review
Cons
  • Firebase/Firestore has very limited support for querying more complicated items; for example, performing a simple string search is not possible.
  • While upfront costs are low, costs can grow quickly if you're not careful about what you are being billed for.
  • Dashboards have at times shown different information to what is billed, and support from Google is less than stellar and not as effective as that from Amazon or Microsoft.
Read full review
  • Email support is SLOW unless I want to allow a stranger to access my production firewall. That is never allowed here, so our hands are tied in terms of being able to get support in less than 48 hours.
  • Again, support takes far too long because you refuse to employ any staff that works in US time zones during normal business hours.
  • There has to be another option besides: 1) you take full control of my systems or 2) I wait on SLOW email support that isn't that great.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are very happy with Authpoint and see no reason to make any change to it. If only there was a policy to set minimum password strength requirements and to force users change their password every xx days, then it would be a 10!!!
Read full review
Usability
I don't use the Firebase UI much, but rather connect it to GA4. GA4 has a great event model but the GA4 UI and analysis capabilities are limited. It's harder to measure product usage type of engagement but if you have the time and resources to leverage the GA4 to BiqQuery export you'll have all the raw event data you'll need for deep analysis, segmentation, and audience activation.
Read full review
After initial setup, it practically runs itself. Onboarding new users is fast and easy as it should be. The AuthPoint mobile app is small and simple to use. The only reason I do not give it a 10 is that I frequently get complaints from end users that the AuthPoint app is "constantly downloading". In fact, it's not downloading anything and that what the users are seeing in the app is a timer for the 6-digit code that changes every minute.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Has rarely been unable to use; if that were the case, it was operator error
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No apparent problem besides a couple of times that systems weren't working
Read full review
Support Rating
Our analytics folks handled the majority of the communication when it came to customer service, but as far as I was aware, the support we got was pretty good. When we had an issue, we were able to reach out and get support in a timely fashion. Firebase was easy to reach and reasonably available to assist when needed.
Read full review
WatchGuard support is always quick and reliable. They have urgency levels that you are able to select when creating your support ticket, and they respond in accordance to the severity that you have set. I have never had an issue with getting someone on the phone in the same business day, even for very low priority issues.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
It was an Onsite demo at the ditributor with the benefits of Watchguard Authpoint. Was very nice to see the abilities of the product. This Demo was a few years back, since then Authpoint changed allot. It is very nice for partners that you can get this demo without any aditional cost.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
We use the online training for all our employees. There are both sales and technical trainings available and there even is a technical certification. You can use this for the Watchguard Partner Program which can give you aditional benefits. Every now and then you have a webinar that discusses multiple Watchguard products.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
the first time it takes more effort. It is helpful to already understand how each authentication type works. Then it's much easier to understand the MFA solution that you implement. It is useful to check the release notes from time to time and update the key parts of the Watchguard Authpoint. Authpoint Gateway, Logon App, RDWeb... Also, it's useful to set up notifications when something goes wrong or sometimes check the statistics of how many requests are being approved/denied, etc.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Before using Firebase, we exclusively used self hosted database services. Using Firebase has allowed us to reduce reliance on single points of failure and systems that are difficult to scale. Additionally, Firebase is much easier to set up and use than any sort of self hosted database. This simplicity has allowed us to try features that we might not have based on the amount of work they required in the past.
Read full review
I chose Watchguard for the bundle of features and customer support, not to mention the transparency you get with a paid program versus an open-source version. Mainly, I liked having so many of the solutions I needed in one place without having to find separate programs.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We are a medium-sized company. We don't need rapid scaling.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Firebase has been able to help us understand reliably, the drop-off in our user flows with their funnel feature. This has made it easy for us to be able to pinpoint weaknesses in our funnel and test and optimize with data as the dependent variable.
  • From an economic standpoint, we don't pay for Firebase which is great, but as the saying goes "You get what you pay for" also holds true in this context. As we looked to grow and scale, we looked for a paid solution.
  • From a developer resource standpoint, Firebase has been extremely easy to integrate into our app. Whether it be the event tracking, dynamic links or crash reporting we have not had to waste too much developer time thanks to their well-organized developer docs.
Read full review
  • We currently have 300 users on Authpoint, and most of them use insecure passwords. Authpoint gives us peace of mind that we don't have to police individual employee passwords.
  • In line with the comment above, with so many people in our organization using insecure passwords, I'm sure that Authpoint has already saved us from many potential security breaches.
  • Security breaches can cost a lot of money. Preventing them saves the company money and helps to achieve our bottom line.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WatchGuard AuthPoint Screenshots

Screenshot of AuthPoint app - tokensScreenshot of Cloud management - dashboardScreenshot of AuthPoint app - push notificationScreenshot of AuthPoint - TokensScreenshot of AuthPoint Sign-In ScreenScreenshot of AuthPoint Users