Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.
N/A
Webtrends Optimize
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Webtrends Optimize is a web optimization platform and is offered by the company of the same name. The product competes most often with Adobe Test and Target, Maxymiser, SiteSpect, and Optimizely.
N/A
Pricing
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Webtrends Optimize
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Webtrends Optimize
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
There is no tiering and no different prices for different tools. The entire feature set is available to all users as standard at one price, agreed up front.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Webtrends Optimize
Considered Both Products
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiments is a free tool and the leading tool in the industry. It's pretty simple to set up a test and use content experiments to monitor objectives once Google Analytics is installed. Less experienced team members can run tests with some training. There are …
It frankly was down to cost. Other platforms offer better targeting etc., however, we found that unless we could demonstrate early value - we didn't get budget sign off. Our teams aren't usually large enough to justify the cost and time to invest in a more complex platform - so …
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Google Content Experiment cannot compete with Adobe Test and Target, Quadratics or even Optimizley. It is harder to use with no editing interface, so pages must be actually developed. It doesn't allow for any advanced segmenting or multivarient testing. But it is free, so …
Google CE is free, Optimizely isn't plus only until recently I found out that Optimizely can work with multiple goals, however, this was found by meeting their employees at a trade show and not via their website.
We'd use content experiments as a complimentary testing tool alongside more comprehensive testing packages out there. As a free testing tool it does the job for basic A/B testing.
If you are looking for a more advanced great value for money solution I would recommend investigating Visual Website Optimizer. For a more powerful enterprise level solution with the option to have a fully managed service I would recommend Maxymiser.
Google Content Experiments provides significantly more insight, historical data and analysis than Unbounce. However, if you do need a solution that offers a WYSIWYG editor, landing page hosting, and limited reporting and testing, Unbounce is a good all-in-one solution and that …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
GCE isn't better or worse than any of these, it's just different. When I have the time to build a new page, setup the testing scripts, and go - then I'll use GCE. If I'm doing multivariate I use VWO. If I'm testing a quick button or headline change, I use Optimizely or UnBounce.
Google CE does a great job streamlining tools and features. Optimizely does not offer nearly the same amount of tools or resources that G CE does. I would use CE in the future but stay away from Optimizely. Google also has a lot more resources for accruing knowledge on it …
There's a LOT of B2B software out there. It's easy to get lost in all of the incoherent noise, between different programs. Webtrends is constantly updating and working with their users to create the best experience possible. I would highly recommend webtrends, and as a second …
Webtrends Optimize is one of the best solutions out there for digital marketers to improve their sales by providing a better experience for their customers' journey. With that said, it is also a costly solution in comparison to other services in the market today. The adage of …
Webtrends, Qubit and Maxymiser were all excellent companies to work with. There's honestly not much between them in my experience. I selected Webtrends based on the quality of their consultants.
Webtrends Optimize can be used for much more complex tests, allows better conversion tracking and data collection. Visual Website Optimizer (VWO) is suitable for smaller, simple projects. Webtrends Optimize comes with an excellent consultancy that could save you a lot of time …
Webtrends Optimize definitely gave me a more comphrensive overview of the product
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Webtrends Optimize
Omniture: extreme feature set and integration with business intelligence and other systems. The problem was price. I was never able to convince management that the price tag was justified.
Features
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Webtrends Optimize
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
9% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
a/b experiment testing
9.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Split URL testing
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Multivariate testing
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
9.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Test significance
9.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Advanced code editor
9.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Page surveys
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Preview mode
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
8.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Server-side tests
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
13% above category average
Webtrends Optimize
8.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
10.00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
10.00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Website personalization
10.00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments is suited for large and small organizations, no matter your organizational goals. It is not recommended for organizations that are only interested in qualitative data, as there are other tools for receiving specific user experience feedback. It is also not recommended that you implement tests without some sort of goal in mind.
There are certainly a few things to consider. If you're looking to run A/B/n or Multivariate tests with some basic segmentation or targeting then Webtrends Optimize is capable of providing that. If budget is a major consideration then that is another area where Optimize may be more attractive. However, based on both of these criteria it is my opinion that there are other tools out there that provide more value. For segmentation discovery, identification of user affinities, and execution of an effective targeting and personalization strategy then there are certainly other tools that should be considered.
When you need to measure against event-based goals
If you need to see how the test variations performed against secondary goals
Given that the the platform requires you actually code a new page with a unique URL, this tool can be good for radical redesigns.
Great insights into other information about your testing groups, like whether or not they're mobile, screen size, browser, or really any dimension available in GA.
The Webtrends team are excellent at taking the time to understand and learn about our distinct business needs, and recommend suggestions in response.
The Webtrends platform has undergone several changes over the time I was using it. This illustrates the constant thrive to improve their service to users, something I greatly appreciated.
Webtrends Optimize enables the whole process to be simple with its handy instructional guides that can inform clients about using the service.
The cost is a factor. When you're trying to save money, particularly as a startup (a lot of our clients are up-and-comers) it has to be seen as an investment...but the cost to implement the system is fairly large.
There's a bit of a steep learning curve, you can't just dive into the program.
It's not impossible but it's not as easy as snapping your fingers to easily implement the program cross-platform.
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
Set up of basic tests that do not use segmentation or targeting is an intuitive experience that can be learned quickly by new users. However, as the need for segmentation and other more advanced capabilities arise, the experience begins to degrade.
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Webtrends Optimize is one of the best solutions out there for digital marketers to improve their sales by providing a better experience for their customers' journey. With that said, it is also a costly solution in comparison to other services in the market today. The adage of you gets what you pay for is true as they are a market leader in the optimization space.
Doing good experiments/Optimize has helped to take out the guesswork of the things we want to implement.
We have done fairly complex changes such as changing navigation and managed to see improvements outcomes immediately before we have to request developer.
Our teams have become more data centric in how they approach changes.
So far we haven't seen an ROI that we can accurately measure due to only running a couple of tests that haven't resulted in direct, site wide changes. However, we have learnt a lot about how to set up the right processes and documentation.