Heyflow is a no-code platform to build, design and integrate clickflows, headquartered in Hamburg. They state their belief that user interaction is the most important activity on the web. And they believe that clickflows are the best way to achieve great interactions. They aim to empower businesses to convert more traffic with clickflows.
$89
per month
Hunter
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Hunter is a cloud-based email search solution that helps businesses find and verify professional email addresses from domains, companies or a specific professional on the web.
$0
per month
Pricing
Heyflow
Hunter
Editions & Modules
Starter
$89
per month
Growth
$149
per month
Scale
$299
per month
Enterprise
from $1100
per month (billed annually)
Free
$0.00
per month
Starter
$49
per month
Growth
$99
per month
Pro
$199
per month
Enterprise
$399
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Heyflow
Hunter
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Discount available for annual subscription as well as for start ups.
Heyflow Vs. Typeform = Heyflow wins because of design flexibility as TF is very stuck in their typical classical look. Heyflow also comes with a plethora of more options to improve lead quality and has drop-off analytics as standard.
In our opinion, Heyflow offers far superior design options and, due to its ease of use, integrates much more effectively into a company. Furthermore, the price-performance ratio is significantly better, and excellent support is integrated, ensuring you always have a contact …
Before I switched to Heyflow, I used Go High Level. The difference is night and day. Though Go High Level has some basic survey and quiz features, it's way harder to make it look professional and actually work like you want it to. First, I tried switching to ScoreApp, but I …
I like Heyflow better because you have more customization options and can stand out better from other funnels and landing pages. This is particularly well received by our customers.
I've also used Apollo.io, and I think they actually work best in tandem. Apollo.io is great for broad research and list building. You can search an organization's name and find all the folks who work there that meet your search criteria. It's great for building a big list of …
Hunter is a good all in one solution, which hasnt always been the case as it used to be a daa only solution. However, other tools like Lemlist as slightly more user friendly and make it so simple to build and launch multi-channel campaigns , and do this slightly better than …
LinkedIn Sales Navigator gives no way to contact leads once you've found them. ZoomInfo is powerful for information but not designed to reach out to leads efficiently.
A great place for reaching information of potential customers. Also, the support team immediately responds to your inquiries, and all team members are so kind. Couldn't have asked for more
I have evaluated Lusha, RocketReach, Mail Tester, etc. but I found Hunter more appropriate because it was the tool that completes my need as I don't require the contact numbers of the particular person. But if I required the contact information of the person then Hunter must …
Hunter is a simple tool that does two things very well. (Identifies the proper email format at target prospect websites & verifies and confirms a leads email address.) It has great data and is helpful for any seller regardless of company and target size. It does not provide …
Zoom is currently our go to platform for finding contact information and email addresses. It is much more expansive than Hunter but it's also much more expensive. The data is some of the best quality in the industry and included direct dial and mobile numbers. If you have the …
Seamless is great, it is a bit more robust as it also includes phone numbers (personal line, office extensions, company line) Also, has CRM integration like Salesforce.
Hunter is a much more user-friendly version of Clearbit. I personally also find it to be more accurate than Clearbit. With Clearbit it felt like too many clicks to get to the information that you wanted. With Hunter, it is a simple copy - paste - click, to get the information …
Hunter is easier to use but it would appear from the limited use of ZoomInfo that their product is more robust. However, it is a paid service so I don't feel it is an apples-to-apples comparison.
Hunter.io is a much cheaper alternative to Data.com, and provides just as accurate data. Data.com does offer more contacts per company as it tries to map out org charts at a company, but you'll often see many of the same contacts at Hunter.io as you would on Data.com. I …
We have been trying to get lead information on SalesTools and PLENTY, however, these two tools are mostly oriented to create follow-up campaigns and the setup is pretty complicated. If you are looking to create just a list of semi-qualified leads, you may try Hunter, but …
SellHack is a superior product. If I were to do an email search of 50 or 100 names, SellHack would win hands down. Hunter would do well, and for that I'm grateful, but it's just not as strong.
I use Hunter in combination with some of the above-mentioned tools. Hunter is faster than any other tool, especially when dealing with large lists. I have also found that Hunter's bounce rate is lower than any other of the dozen tools I've tested.
While LinkedIn Sales Navigator has a larger and greater amount of data available (including mutual connections, etc.), it is hard to overlook the value that Hunter provides in explicitly and simply sharing a contact's information. Added to the fact that Hunter has a Chrome …
Its well suited for us when we start a new campaign independent from Unbounce, and for making more creative and fluid user flows. Its worked well for us on our lower volume lead campaigns, we havent yet used it for anything high volume. We love the drop off analysis, where it gives you an exit rate each step of the journey, but feel the a/b testing side could be improved, in Unbounce we can test 20 variants at once (due to the amount of traffic), doesnt seem as easy on Heyflow. Also I've hit a max number of flows quite quickly so probably due to upgrade account, however with Unbounce we could have 100s of flows
Hunter.io is very well suited for any sales rep who is building out lists of contacts for email outreach, or for marketer's looking to reach out to PR and marketing contacts for link building campaigns. The tool is a great free option if you are doing targeted, 1:1 personalized outreach and you need a few contacts. The tool can be expensive if you are needing to reach thousands of people. A paid version of Hunter.io is not a great fit if you already pay for another list building source such as Data.com or Discover.Org.
Provides email domains very well. While some companies have a different domain for their "info@xyz.com", Hunter is able to find the domain that is being used by individuals at the company.
For American contacts in particular it is very good at finding personal phone numbers.
Helps to enrich the contacts that might be in a company by providing a confirmed list of employees.
As an extra - I really like how easy it is to use. You can input the contacts name and copy-paste from the chrome extension quickly and easily. This saves a load of time when you are trying to find the right address.
Restricted webhook functionality, wed like to be able to map fields without having to post the full request and change the receiving webhook our end to cater to Heyflow
a/b testing, not being able to 'keep' older variants which we may want to retest later
little things like we only do uk market so all phone numbers start with 01 or 07 so we want to have a placeholder example thats familiar to the user eg 07766554433 but the system is restricted to +447766554433 which is a conversion factor for us
There have been times when I've search Hunter for an address on a website and it came back with no results. Then If I search the site I've often found an email address or two. So I'm curious why it wasn't able to find it with the tool, even when I could on my own?
I'm not sure what the reasons were exactly why LinkedIn ordered the cease and desist, but I had hoped they two companies could come to terms or that at the least LinkedIn would acquire Hunter. But alas, it's not been the case.
Heyflow hat mich von Anfang an begeistert – und das nicht nur wegen der intuitiven Benutzeroberfläche. Die Plattform schafft es, komplexe Prozesse wie Leadgenerierung, Qualifizierung oder Terminvereinbarungen in einfache, interaktive und visuelle Erlebnisse zu verwandeln.
In wenigen Minuten lassen sich Flows erstellen, anpassen und live schalten – ohne auf Entwickler warten zu müssen.
Mit Features wie progressiver Datenerfassung, A/B-Testing, personalisierter Ansprache und reibungsloser UX steigern wir messbar die Conversion Rates. Ich kann CI-konforme, moderne und mobiloptimierte Flows gestalten, die genau zu der Zielgruppe passen. Für mich ist Heyflow nicht nur ein Tool, sondern ein echter Gamechanger im digitalen Marketing. Es verbindet Effizienz mit Kreativität – und das mit einem Wow-Effekt für Nutzer und Kund:innen
Intuitive interface: The platform should have a user-friendly interface that guides users through the design process seamlessly. Ease of customization: Users should be able to easily customize their forms, flows, and landing pages to match their branding and requirements. Accessibility: The platform should be accessible to users of all skill levels, from beginners to experienced designers. Speed and efficiency: Users should be able to quickly create and deploy their content without encountering unnecessary delays or complications. Helpful support and resources: Heyflow should provide adequate support and resources, such as tutorials, documentation, and customer service, to assist users in navigating the platform effectively.
Hunter is a pretty straightforward tool to use, like most of the tools on the market that execute the same sort of process. I would say it is not quite as user-friendly as some of the other tools on the market, which offer a plug and play process, but it is still fit for purpose.
There have been no notable outages of HEyflow to date, not even in the past. If an outage is imminent, HEyflow will announce it in good time. If it occurs unexpectedly, SUpport will find a solution as quickly as possible. In some cases, a different server solution has been offered temporarily to minimize downtime. All in all, the response times of the support team are excellent.
Heyflow's performance is truly exemplary and fast. We have never had any performance issues, regardless of how many visuals or videos we used. Unfortunately, we cannot comment on integrations, as we do not use any except for a Meta Pixel. However, even this has not affected our performance so far.
Heyflow's support is truly world-class. Whether via chat or email, you'll receive genuine help. If a problem can't be resolved immediately, they'll look into it and usually get back to you the next day. Their response time is generally very fast compared to other companies. It's also possible to book a free appointment at any time, during which a representative will contact you by phone to offer advice and assistance on how to improve your performance.
I had already used Heyflow at my previous company because I was familiar with it from a service provider. Therefore, it was an easy decision to implement Heyflow again. The implementation was very straightforward, just as planned. There were absolutely no problems, and it worked perfectly from the start. But that's precisely what makes Heyflow so great!
Heyflow Vs. Typeform = Heyflow wins because of design flexibility as TF is very stuck in their typical classical look. Heyflow also comes with a plethora of more options to improve lead quality and has drop-off analytics as standard. Heyflow Vs. Growform = This one is tougher as I think Growform is very competitive with what you get value-wise like no charge for phone and email network validations against Twilio and Neverbounce API's. Also Growform comes with a much more generous submission count for their smaller tiers AND I'm not capped by the amount of forms.
Hunter is a much more user-friendly version of Clearbit. I personally also find it to be more accurate than Clearbit. With Clearbit it felt like too many clicks to get to the information that you wanted. With Hunter, it is a simple copy - paste - click, to get the information you need. The additional list of contacts it provides and the verification source is also more readable.
The overall scalability is excellent in Heyflow. We have the ability to work across locations as a team without any limitations; it doesn't matter how many team members we have or how many customers we cover. The scalability and flexibility also allow us to serve our customers with the same account and thus cover different business segments when it comes to online forms.