IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPC vs. Mendix vs. OutSystems

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPC
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers are customizable, public or private, cloud-based servers available from IBM. User can launch applications and software across blended, hybrid environments as the servers integrate with all cloud models.
$0.01
per hour
Mendix
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Mendix is a low code platform-as-a-service offering with mobile and social extensions. Mendix was acquired by Siemens August 2018.
$0
OutSystems
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
The OutSystems Platform is a Platform-as-a-Service solution for rapid delivery of responsive web and mobile applications. It includes functionalities required to develop, deploy, manage and change web and mobile applications. It is targeted at the delivery of enterprise applications that require integration with backend systems, complex business rules and logic, usable interfaces and flexibility to change. It can be deployed in the cloud, on-premises or in hybrid environments.
$4,000
per month
Pricing
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPCMendixOutSystems
Editions & Modules
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (dedicated host)
starting at $0.22
per hour
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (dedicated host)
starting at $149.00
per month
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (multi-tenant)
starting at $0.038
per hour
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (multi-tenant)
starting at $25.21
per month
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (reserved)
starting at $0.02
per hour
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (reserved)
starting at $13.27
per month
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers (transient)
starting at $0.01
per hour
Free Edition
$0
Pro Edition
1,250
per month (billed annually)
Enterprise Edition
1,675
per month (billed annually)
Basic
$4,000.00
per month
Pro
$10,000.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPCMendixOutSystems
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsIBM Cloud virtual servers include 250 GB of outbound public bandwidth, unmetered inbound public bandwidth, and unmetered private and management network bandwidth.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPCMendixOutSystems
Considered Multiple Products
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPC

No answer on this topic

Mendix
Chose Mendix
Cordys has cost us a lot of money. Mendix and OutSystems are similar products but we just liked Mendix better. The Mendix community is really helpful. You get answers in hours when you post a question on their forum. And the Mendix's help desk is also always there to help you …
Chose Mendix
The two were neck-and-neck on most measures. OutSystems, at the time, had more of a WYSIWYG UI development environment. We chose to work first with Mendix because we could implement the WebService interface to Exari DocGen with less Java/C++ code than was required for OutSyste…
Chose Mendix
Mendix is more flexible and custom making oriented than Appian. OutSystems is almost the same as Mendix but more directed to the traditional developer, whereas Mendix is trying to make it possible for everyone to be able to model.
Chose Mendix
Although I have never worked with OutSystems, Mendix is seen as a platform that can be used more easily by people that do not have an IT background. Mendix is indeed a platform that makes it possible for people with a business background (and are IT minded) to create beautiful …
Chose Mendix
they are good but Mendix is more of enterprise grade. Mendix has many modules available and ready plug ins
Chose Mendix
Because most of our apps work closely with our main system (ERP) and other tools, we went with Mendix. It's good at easily connecting with lots of different systems, which is exactly what we need. Another thing we like about it is that it can handle growth well, and its pricing …
Chose Mendix
Most flexible and scalable platform
Chose Mendix
Overall, these have a lot in common, but where Mendix really stands out, is its ability to integrate with multiple (previously existing) systems.
Chose Mendix
Mendix is more business oriented and focusses on visual coding.
Chose Mendix
Mendix is based on model driven development and uses model interpretation in stead of code generation.
Chose Mendix
Integration is far more easy with Mendix.
Chose Mendix
I prefer Mendix because of its open structure the others mostly have vendor lock-in.
Chose Mendix
We did not deep dive into the competitors that far, primarily because of the support of the Mendix team. We felt that from a technology standpoint they were all likely close enough. What separated Mendix was the willingness of the people to make sure we succeeded. I believe the …
Chose Mendix
We selected Mendix over the competition simply because it seems like Mendix is growing faster than the competitors. The functionality is largely the same, but the price and resources favors Mendix at least at the time I reviewed the industry landscape in 2015.
OutSystems
Chose OutSystems
I evaluated Mendix. OutSystems has many features baked in where they are third party add-ons on Mendix. For example the Process Modeling is baked into OutSystems. That is great. I also get a sense of better community support with OutSystems than with Mendix.

Chose OutSystems
Mendix was similar to OutSystems, but OutSystems seemed more polished in comparison. Note we reviewed Mendix over two years ago and I have not seen the product since to update the comparison.
Chose OutSystems
Mendix is a great platform, but [when considering] the platform capabilities when compared to Outsystems (and when you add to the people aspect of Outsystems), Outsystems comes out a distinct winner.
Chose OutSystems
Mendix is getting close to OutSystems but has too many vendor locks. Apart from that Mendix is no way near the current status of OS.
Betty Blocks is more suitable to service SME companies, since the costs are lower but the featureset is way smaller.
Chose OutSystems
The two platforms are similar in a lot of respects but Mendix has a strong project management side where OutSystems put a focus on the devops. We had an existing project management solution so the increased focus on devops was a better fit. We are also a .NET shop and …
Chose OutSystems
We did two analyses of a POC of a week, comparing OutSystems and Mendix. From our point of view, OutSystems was a better fit for bigger enterprises, and IT can still keep an eye on a possible wide growth of new applications and solutions. After this POC, we also had a look at Be…
Chose OutSystems
We had a very comprehensive comparison between Mendix and OutSystems. We had multiple demonstrations of the platform and we had them both build a mockup or dummy application within a day at our office. After those meetings it was a pretty easy pick between the both of them. It …
Chose OutSystems
Where Mendix looks nice, but mobile application have runtime interpreters, it makes maintaining multiple application and managing them very hard.
Thinkwise is a nice ERP platform, but cannot be compared to OutSystems because they are miles apart. The developer experience is a …
Chose OutSystems
OutSystems is a tool that we developers use to develop an application that is a service studio. We don't need to download any other tool to create our application. Service studio provides all the functionalities related to front end things just like React Native provide, and …
Chose OutSystems
Although I haven't tried much of other low-code platforms, what I know, what I read, what they share with me ... there is currently no better platform than OutSystems in the low code market. And the tendency is for OutSystems to be increasingly disruptive.
Chose OutSystems
OutSystems had many more possibilities and a good user community. The stability, reliability, and performance of the tool were much higher compared to any other RAD platforms.
Chose OutSystems
  • I think the way it was presented by our installation partner Coolprofs.
  • And the easy to get results way of programming
Chose OutSystems
The vision and strategy of OutSystems (developer oriented) fits our company. Also the technology stack and scalabilty options outperform the competition. We have now also learned that the platform keeps developing, releasing new relevant features frequently. Another advantage …
Chose OutSystems
We found OutSystems had superior options and worked better for us.
Chose OutSystems
Easier to learn and use. More flexible.
Chose OutSystems
The biggest benefit is that it helps avert vendor lock-in (you can take the code and leave if you need to/want to)! Also, OutSystems supports multi-tenancy and directly incorporates containers and DevOps concepts/tools. OutSystems is on top of analyst charts for two …
Chose OutSystems

Most complete solution. Beyond the super fast ability to create high-quality web and native mobile apps, the built-in analytics have proven to almost eliminate the need for added overhead of analytics tags.

I've been following OutSystems for 3 years and the pace of innovation …

Chose OutSystems
OutSystems has a better product for all deployment models, overall the product is much more matured; deployment and post-production analytics are better. UI components are richer. Using the overall ecosystem of tools provided, development teams can confidently deliver …
Chose OutSystems
We have evaluated against Mendix, K2, SharePoint and we have found that Outsystems could cover all of the specs and then some more.
Chose OutSystems
We evaluated Mendix.
But Outsystems proved to be superior in the terms of the flexibility, platform governance and the promise it offers.
Features
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPCMendixOutSystems
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPC
7.4
88 Ratings
10% below category average
Mendix
-
Ratings
OutSystems
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime9.181 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling9.076 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing8.664 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates3.972 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools7.384 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images5.277 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support7.084 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls9.178 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPC
-
Ratings
Mendix
9.0
9 Ratings
7% above category average
OutSystems
7.9
54 Ratings
6% below category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings9.39 Ratings5.351 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings8.99 Ratings8.052 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings9.09 Ratings6.351 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings9.49 Ratings8.149 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings8.89 Ratings9.954 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings8.89 Ratings10.051 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPCMendixOutSystems
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPCMendixOutSystems
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(88 ratings)
9.0
(66 ratings)
7.1
(130 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(12 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(5 ratings)
7.8
(14 ratings)
7.5
(44 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers for VPCMendixOutSystems
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
One scenario that immediately came to my mind was large-scale data processing, IBM Cloud Virtual Servers is well-suited for organizations that require high-performance computing capabilities, particularly when processing large amounts of data. It can also be useful for companies or organizations that wish to migrate their workplace to the cloud and it may suite companies that have strict compliance requirements since the servers have robust security features.
Read full review
Siemens AG
Mendix excels in scenarios involving Business Process Automation, making it a strong choice for applications requiring workflow automation, including processes like request approvals, document management, and other business workflows.Conversely, Mendix may be less suitable for projects that demand highly customized solutions with extensive custom coding. Its primary focus on low-code development may not align well with the requirements of projects that heavily rely on intricate and specialized coding.
Read full review
OutSystems
Well suited for internal exposure of business processes (invoicing, API layer to other systems, customer maintenance etc), whether a UI is required or not. Not so well suited for full fledged web design. An OutSystems application must serve one particular business need, if gets too much functionalities and responsibilities it tends to get chaotic and complex.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Scalability: IBM Cloud Virtual Servers enable businesses to simply and quickly scale up or down the resources they require in response to changing business demands. This enables firms to respond to traffic spikes, requests for new services, or changes in business size without the need for additional hardware purchases or maintenance.
  • Cost savings: By employing virtual servers in the cloud, enterprises can decrease capital expenditures for hardware and infrastructure while also lowering ongoing operational expenses by removing server maintenance and management costs. This can result in significant cost savings for enterprises, particularly those that need to raise or decrease their computer capacity fast and easily.
  • High availability: IBM Cloud Virtual Servers is built with high availability in mind, giving enterprises the certainty that their applications and data will be available and accessible even if hardware fails or other disruptions occur. This assists enterprises in maintaining business continuity and lowering the chance of downtime, which is crucial for firms that rely on 24/7 access to their systems. Furthermore, IBM's comprehensive network and security features aid in the prevention of data breaches and other security risks, assuring the availability and reliability of their applications and data.
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • We're able to really easily develop different views that are very specific to a customer's needs or customer's different types of user needs. So for example, the production managers can have a certain view that's relevant to them and then certain line managers can have views that are specific to them that allow them to run different scenarios which they define. So it allows us to easily build customized apps for each different type of user.
Read full review
OutSystems
  • Developing end user interfaces with ease and speed with a modern look and feel.
  • First class low code development to reduce time to market with visual programming
  • Their technical support team is fast and responsive. We've yet to have any issues they could not resolve.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • It would also be nice if there were more templates to choose from when creating a server. Right now there are only a few options, and we'd like to see more variety.
  • We'd like to see the ability to create server groups. This would make it easier to manage a large number of servers since we could do all of the updates and management tasks for them at once.
  • There doesn't seem to be a way to automatically install updates on all of the virtual servers. We have to go in and manually update each one, which can be time-consuming. It would be really nice if automatic updates can be done.
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • Earlier versions lacked in UI/Ux. This is still improving.
  • Since everyone and anyone can create custom add ons (widgets), Mendix could improve their quality checks (but not as rigid as eg Apple).
  • Upgradeability used to be somewhat of an issue. Version 7 looks to be handling this better than previous versions.
Read full review
OutSystems
  • Price – The licensing model of OutSystems is very expensive and not suitable for small scale developments. This is offset by the time to develop and stability for larger scale developments
  • Flexibility on PaaS version – The PaaS hosted version of OutSystems limits your flexibility to access the front end and backend database systems which can significantly restrict your options on high data volume developments or where anything requiring slightly out of the ordinary access is required
  • Same price for PaaS and self-hosted system. Licensing model dictates that you pay the same price even when you host the system on your own hardware which effectively means you pay more to manage the infrastructure yourself
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
It has a flexible and affordable pricing, easy to configure and manage. It is easy to spawn one or multiple instances and have them up and running in no time
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
OutSystems
We are very happy with OutSystems and our developers deliver good work. OutSystems lets us build new software on a regulare (2 weekly) basis, which is highly flexible and adjustable. Even without very much experience, our developers manage to build usefull software, which is working a lot better than our previous (legacy) software.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
A 10 would say I have nothing to wish for. A 9 means I haven't seen anything better.This tool really helps you in the whole creation and maintenace cycle, so from requirements to building/modeling to testing to deploying to capturing feedback.
Read full review
OutSystems
OutSystems has a feature in which we can develop a functionality in a application and can use that functionality in another application without developing it again. That is main plus point for the development team so they can work with different functionalities rather focusing on the same thing again and again. if we want to make any change on the user side then we can make it live with just the deployment using the service center.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
Always available when you need an instance.
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
OutSystems
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
Most of the instances work on hypervisors with good processors, but not all of them.
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
OutSystems
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
It is adequate, but you need to be ready to argue your point - which is fair enough, I suppose, but being given the opposite of the benefit of the doubt every time does not necessarily result in an enjoyable user experience.
Read full review
Siemens AG
Response times are quick and you will get updates regularly about the status of your request. Even with very technical questions they have specialists that can help you with your problems it will give you an answer or help you with a work around.
Read full review
OutSystems
The tech support is very reachable. Usually by [email] from but also by phone if needed. We had some difficulties at the start with understanding "what our machine was doing" under high performance load. After some good sessions understanding our needs they delivered good solutions for our problems we had in the beginning.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
OutSystems
Excellent material full of hands on that improve the understanding of the platform.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
OutSystems
The online training material is well designed and explanations are step by step, helping trainees to understand and follow each exercise and new concept.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
We did not use IBM professional services to implement IBM Cloud Virtual Servers.
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
OutSystems
In a large company, patiently and consistently work the behind the scenes politics with business and IT partners across the firm.
This is transformational - you will need a solid set of key business partners to lock arms together to move forward.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
IBM Cloud Virtual Servers offer more customization options than Amazon EC2, with the ability to select from a range of operating systems, storage types, and network configurations. IBM also provides a wide range of tools and services to help manage and optimize your virtual servers, including a web-based console, CLI, and API.

AWS EC2 is a more managed platform, with a focus on providing a simple and easy-to-use interface. Amazon provides a range of predefined instance types, each with different specs and pricing, to make it easy to find the right option for your needs. AWS also offers a number of management and monitoring tools, but these are often more basic than what is available from IBM.
Read full review
Siemens AG
Mendix would be my preferred system all the way. The system is designed for these kinds of works. I've worked with WP and DNN but they should be used just for websites. To create an app for a business value, I would suggest Mendix. Also, the offline capabilities of Mendix have greatly improved since the deployment of Mendix 7.13.
Read full review
OutSystems
I tried to use WordPress with some success. Also looked at Joomla. But when I saw OutSystems I knew I had been wasting my time there. It takes you longer to get going with OutSystems - but even I as a novice realized immediately that Outsystems is simply in another league. Outsystems is powerful. (Can you compare WordPress and Joomla to Outsystems - I don't think so).
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
It worked well for us in the beginning, it works well for us when we have more instances.
Read full review
Siemens AG
No answers on this topic
OutSystems
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Supports businesses who want compute power on demand (instances are ready within minutes).
  • It can give you access to a 32-core CPU at $0.29 for short running or interruptible processes - enabling cost-efficient number crunching.
  • Given me a taste of the powers of remote compute power for compilation and development.
Read full review
Siemens AG
  • It helps to speed up application development because of its low code by the fact that it's low code. It allows professional developers to focus more on specialized application development rather than the more routine application development that business IT and super users can do for themselves with some coaching from the IT department. So it's just allowing the more specialist professional developers.net, for example, Java in our organization to focus on more complex engineering application developments.
Read full review
OutSystems
  • The ease of use of the OutSystems development process has been the biggest ROI for us. We have developed our Framework product and maintained/enhanced it with only 4 workers.
  • OutSystems has enhanced their product very significantly over the last 4 years. They have gone from a simple to use tool to a very simple to use sophisticated tool that covers the standard mainframe-based computing apps and the apps used on handheld mobile devices all using the same basic set of development tools.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mendix Screenshots

Screenshot of Agile Project Management: Collaborate. Manage. Iterate.Screenshot of Central App Management: Application Management Made Easy.Screenshot of App Store: Hundreds of building blocks to get you out of the gate.Screenshot of 1-Click Deployment: Efficient DevOps. Enabled.