Jira Work Management vs. Planview AgilePlace

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jira Work Management
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Jira Core is Atlassian's general purpose business and project management tool available to smaller companies or teams and designed to suit a variety of purposes (e.g. marketing planning, product roadmap, etc.). In Jira Core, Workflows define process and enable teams to track tasks. Jira Core Cloud instances also have boards that let users visualize workflows and drag and drop tasks from to-do to done. It is available on the cloud.N/A
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
Pricing
Jira Work ManagementPlanview AgilePlace
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jira Work ManagementPlanview AgilePlace
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—All editions include unlimited boards.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jira Work ManagementPlanview AgilePlace
Considered Both Products
Jira Work Management

No answer on this topic

Planview AgilePlace
Chose Planview AgilePlace
I personally much prefer AgilePlace over Jira. It is much easier to organize your work and keep track of a wide variety of different types of work.
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Jira Work ManagementPlanview AgilePlace
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Jira Work Management
8.7
17 Ratings
15% above category average
Planview AgilePlace
7.0
21 Ratings
2% below category average
Task Management9.017 Ratings7.921 Ratings
Resource Management8.617 Ratings7.319 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.314 Ratings6.712 Ratings
Scheduling8.415 Ratings6.517 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.316 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration9.117 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.017 Ratings7.917 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology8.59 Ratings6.812 Ratings
Document Management8.513 Ratings6.57 Ratings
Email integration8.714 Ratings7.315 Ratings
Mobile Access8.810 Ratings6.812 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking9.110 Ratings6.44 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.913 Ratings6.68 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Jira Work Management
8.4
12 Ratings
13% above category average
Planview AgilePlace
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates8.110 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing8.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting8.411 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software8.64 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Jira Work Management
-
Ratings
Planview AgilePlace
7.3
5 Ratings
4% below category average
DevOps Tool Integrations00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers00 Ratings7.35 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jira Work ManagementPlanview AgilePlace
Small Businesses
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 8.3 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jira Work ManagementPlanview AgilePlace
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(17 ratings)
7.9
(27 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jira Work ManagementPlanview AgilePlace
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
Jira work management represents the solution that allows business teams such as Finance, sales or marketing to collaborate with technical teams within Jira. It has so many features like the List view, the Calendar view, the Timeline view, the Boards, Workflows, Forms, Project templates, Dashboards and reports and automation. Jira Core is very well capable of increasing productivity of the teams through centralization of information through these different types of views and the automation allows the teams to invest less time in configuration and more time in execution of work.
Read full review
Planview
This tool enables the visual management needed in many offshore teams to easily and quickly see the pending work, work in progress and completed work.For teams that work with a waterfall methodology and do not have AGILE internalized, I believe there are other solutions from Planview or other providers.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Provide a roadmap of all epics
  • Provide a backlog in which you can see all the possible work to be done to create your sprint plan
  • Have all our projects within reach
  • Have a dashboard with editable columns to manage your work
  • Be able to filter by person
  • Be able to see past sprints
Read full review
Planview
  • Ability to color code cards based on type, giving better visibility to the variety of tasks a team handles
  • Ability to set deadline dates and have those dates easily visible
  • Flexibility in design the kanban board. It is easy to add a lane or make a change on the fly. Work doesn't have to stop and a long process created to make simple layout changes.
  • Movement of cards is easy as well as the ability to connect cards to show dependencies.
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • More clarification on where to find useful tools and resources for new users.
  • Breakdown of Projects, Tasks, Sub-tasks, bugs is hard to follow and cannot be changed once created.
  • The ability to customize the dashboard/home page to fit the needs of individuals could use some work.
Read full review
Planview
  • Planview LeanKit currently can't or should not be used as a central spot for data and collaboration. Particularly attachments are not well-handled.
  • The portable side of Planview LeanKit is really lacking.
  • We would appreciate some options to group or stack cards.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Planview
Perfect tool to manage requirement backlog
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Planview
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Planview
Very minimal outages
Read full review
Performance
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Planview
Never experienced major slowness
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Planview
It solves all our needs at this time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Planview
Very easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
Jira provides multiple functionalities which any project needs during implementation. It has the feature of tagging the right owner to the issues. It has made the life of project managers easier to track the resolutions and efforts which was utilised for completing the task. It also provides the feature of attachment where users can attach their testing result/progress in the ticket created in Jira.
Read full review
Planview
I think that LeanKit is very similar to Asana's Kanban feature and Trello, but is much less sleek looking than Asana. Asana's clean and sleek UI makes me enjoy project management much more than LeanKit. It might sound silly that the UI makes so much of a difference to me, but it really does. Trello is also sleeker than LeanKit, but I still prefer Asana because it has more customization options and a better interface. We are actually going to look into switching to ClickUp because we wanted something with a better UI. ClickUp seems to have a great UI with a lot of customization options.
Read full review
Scalability
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Planview
Good use cases for small/large teams
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • It has allow us the proper documentation of over 50 products.
  • Time spent on activities has been reduced by a 25%.
  • The reporting module has allowed us to identify over 10 problems in our workflow, allowing us to solve them and become more effective and efficient with it.
Read full review
Planview
  • Our team meetings are more direct and quick to get through thanks to the better visibility of the workload
  • Easily being able to move cards between team lanes gives instant visibility to where the responsibility for the next step is needed.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview AgilePlace Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-Time Analytics: Utilize board health metrics involving bottlenecks, WIP, and throughput to guide the optimization of workflows, improve velocity, and better prioritize efforts for more predictable delivery. Lean and Agile metrics can be used to assess team performance and promote continuous improvement.Screenshot of PI Planning: Offers enterprise Kanban boards to visualize the work of teams regardless of the methodologies they apply or workflows they follow, and insights into progress and create opportunities for better alignment.Screenshot of Dependency Visualization and Management: Surfaces risks to plans resulting from cross-team dependency conflicts, blockers, and capacity constraints, and helps drive proactive measures to enable teams to deliver on time.Screenshot of Team Planning and Coordination: Boards can be used to breakdown work, build and manage plans, and execute against strategy to deliver more value to customers, faster.