Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Looker
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
Cyfe
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Cyfe is all-in-one dashboard software for analyzing data from online services like Google Analytics, Salesforce, AdSense, MailChimp, Amazon, Facebook, etc, from Traject.
$29
per month
Pricing
LookerCyfe, by Traject
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$29
per month
Standard
$39
per month
Pro
$65
per month
Premier
$119
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LookerCyfe
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LookerCyfe, by Traject
Considered Both Products
Looker

No answer on this topic

Cyfe
Chose Cyfe, by Traject
Cyfe more than holds its own vs the competition. The capabilities are strong - especially for the price.
Features
LookerCyfe, by Traject
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
7.5
132 Ratings
9% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
6.6
28 Ratings
22% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports6.7108 Ratings6.817 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.3131 Ratings4.028 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.5113 Ratings9.120 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
7.1
130 Ratings
12% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
7.2
26 Ratings
11% below category average
Drill-down analysis6.9126 Ratings8.715 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.8128 Ratings8.120 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages5.954 Ratings10.09 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.7129 Ratings2.026 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.0
126 Ratings
3% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
5.0
23 Ratings
49% below category average
Publish to Web7.6104 Ratings4.015 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.3112 Ratings4.021 Ratings
Report Versioning7.782 Ratings6.89 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.5108 Ratings1.017 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Looker
6.5
126 Ratings
21% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
7.2
19 Ratings
11% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.6122 Ratings3.018 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.3108 Ratings8.614 Ratings
Predictive Analytics4.66 Ratings10.08 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Looker
7.4
126 Ratings
14% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
7.1
22 Ratings
18% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)7.9118 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.2103 Ratings6.314 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)7.3120 Ratings8.416 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.458 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.76 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Looker
5.5
94 Ratings
35% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
9.3
19 Ratings
17% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access5.890 Ratings9.418 Ratings
Mobile Application5.01 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.184 Ratings7.713 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Looker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
7.0
7 Ratings
10% below category average
REST API00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings2.05 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings5.94 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings5.83 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LookerCyfe, by Traject
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.8 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LookerCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(132 ratings)
8.0
(29 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(8 ratings)
9.4
(9 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(12 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(14 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LookerCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
When data drives potential for new orders, Looker earns its place in our tech stack. If, on the other hand, we are hoping for pipeline generation, Looker is useful if you are willing to repeatedly go check customer utilizations .... it is not appropriate if you are hoping to automate data analysis for this purpose.
Read full review
Traject
Cyfe might be for you if you are looking for a cost-effective way to display all of your marketing metrics in one place. If you are looking for a detailed, fine-tuned, niche, or extremely specific metrics, this might not be the best solution. Cyfe is good for a general health check-up of marketing, but not a finely tuned examination.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Show visited pages - sessions, pageviews - which programs are viewed the most.
  • Displays session source/medium views to see where users are coming from.
  • It shows the video titles, URLs, and event counts so we can monitor the performance of our videos.
  • It gives a graphic face to the numbers, such as using bar charts, pie graphs, and other charts to show user trends or which channels are driving engagement.
  • Our clients like to see the top pages visited for a month.
  • I like the drop-and-drag approach, and building charts is a little easier than it was before.
Read full review
Traject
  • Has preset metric groups that pull similar stats together in one "bucket" saving you the time of setting up each stat-line one by one
  • Allows you to easily adjust the timeframe for what stats you want to see, so you can find YOY stats or just last month's stats rather quickly
  • Colored visualizations of stats make it easy to notice when campaigns are taking off
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Documentation is scarce, and very difficult to find when you need it.
  • Pricing is unclear, particularly as you look to scale your reports across the business.
  • Data from other sources is not represented in the system as well as first party Google services.
Read full review
Traject
  • I'd love to see additional functionality to customize colors. The light/dark option is very nice, but a little more flexibility in the colors would go a long way, especially if it was possible at the dashboard level rather than just the account level. Along the same lines, being able to customize the charts a little more, for example being able to show an x-axis on single data type graphs, could make them easier to read in some cases.
  • Being able to choose to report on converted clicks or conversions in AdWords would be helpful.
  • Needs the ability to show the date range on the shared URL dashboards. Would be even better if the date range was adjustable on that view, too.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
I give it this rating because it deems as effective, I am able to complete majority of my tasks using this app. It is very helpful when analyzing the data provided and shown in the app and it's just overall a great app for Operational use, despite the small hiccups it has (live data).
Read full review
Traject
It has become a part of our internal tools so unless a competitor comes out with similar functionality as a similar price point it is unlikely that we would not renew. One area that would cause us not to renew would be if a competing service came out with more third-party integrations that match our needs. Price at this point is no longer an issue as it would allow us to automate a somewhat manual process that we have now connecting Cyfe widgets to Google Sheets.
Read full review
Usability
Google
Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
Read full review
Traject
I gave it a rating of 7 because it does a good job at what it does, but there are missing that are missing which I would have benefited from. For instance, if I was able to drill down more on the specific metrics I was able to see, that would have been helpful.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No objections
Read full review
Traject
No answers on this topic
Performance
Google
Somehow resources heavy, both on server and client. I recommned at least 50Mbs data rate and high performance desktop comouter to be abke to run comolex tasks and configure larger amount of data. On the other hand, the client does not need to worry when viewing, the performance is usually ok
Read full review
Traject
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google
Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
Read full review
Traject
Because I had a very minor question and I was able to speak directly to the founder through LinkedIn and through email. I know that as they grow this may not always be an option but the fact that he made himself available to answer my questions said a lot about his passion for the product.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
Very satisfied, easy to implement
Read full review
Traject
Cyfe is a 15 minutes implementation, then some time to get your data sources created. This is an easy one person job that will not result in down time or unnecessary wasted man hours.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Looker Studio, you can easily report on data from various sources without programming. Looker Studio is available at no charge for creators and report viewers. Enterprise customers who upgrade to Looker Studio Pro will receive support and expanded administrative features, including team content management. So it's good.
Read full review
Traject
The Salesforce dashboard is comparably flexible and intuitive, but designed more to its internal CRM focus. SumAll shares the social media dashboard capabilities, but lacks all others. Its interesting feature is side-by-side graph analysis for cross-channel performance. Cyfe might borrow from SumAll's default weekly email summary of performance from the dashboard, but implementation could be too complex. Nuvi dashboard is exclusively for social media marketing, but lacks Cyfe's flexibility for third party integration and window customization settings.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
Perfect price to performance
Read full review
Traject
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Google
  • Looker has a poignant impact on our business's ROI objectives. As an advertising exchange we have specific goals for daily requests and fill, and having premade Looks to monitor this is an integral piece of our operational capability
  • To facilitate an efficient monthly billing cycle in our organization, Looker is essential to track estimated revenue and impression delivery by publisher. Without the Looks we have set up, we would spend considerably more time and effort segmenting revenue by vertical.
  • Looker's unique value proposition is making analytical tools more digestible to people without conventional analytical experience. Other competing tools like Tableau require considerably more training and context to successfully use, and the ability to easily plot different visualizations is one of its greatest selling points.
Read full review
Traject
  • Cyfe allows us to provide real time data to our clients
  • Cyfe allows us to provide detailed analytics to our clients showing actual results
  • Cyfe reduced our need to provide monthly "reports" to our marketing clients
  • Cyfe allows us to have better situational awareness and know what is going on throughout our multiple organizations
Read full review
ScreenShots

Looker Screenshots

Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.