M‑Files vs. PowerDMS by NEOGOV

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
M-Files delivers Context-First Document Management with a metadata-driven architecture that improves productivity across the document lifecycle. By linking documents to the people, processes, clients, and projects that give them meaning, M-Files creates a unified environment that strengthens governance.N/A
PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
PowerDMS by NEOGOV is a software platform designed to recruit, train, equip, and protect employees across their careers, used for policy management, community engagement, and staff scheduling.N/A
Pricing
M‑FilesPowerDMS by NEOGOV
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
M‑FilesPowerDMS by NEOGOV
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
M‑FilesPowerDMS by NEOGOV
Considered Both Products
M‑Files
Chose M‑Files
I have no experience with similar products.
Chose M‑Files
Configuration of general access vs Libraries and silos of data makes this such an easier application to use. Especially when it comes to workflows and security and then support of that configuration.
Chose M‑Files
Microsoft Sharepoint is not very flexible in my opinion. Mass changes are not easy to carry out. Microsoft Teams data is too much. I can't keep up with all the Microsoft Teams groups I'm in.
Chose M‑Files
We selected it because it is having out of box integration capabilities to connect with M-Files. We are using M-Files already as a content management system and we were lacking the feature of document sharing. With Hubshare now this gap has been filled.
Chose M‑Files
Free metadata - the capability to build own solutions - way ahead of any competitive products.
Chose M‑Files
M-Files delivers best-in-class search capabilities. It simply devastates the competition when used even half-way correctly.
Chose M‑Files
Document handling is much easier as in Sharepoint. We select M-files because its metadata model fits our needs better, and it is easier to use than Sharepoint. You can customize metadata easily and fast.
Chose M‑Files
M-Files provides an easier way of managing document that is needed for any organization and the integrations to other systems makes life easier when there needs migration of the documents to M-Files.
Chose M‑Files
M-Files is with totally unique features from these solutions, one of major is all these solutions have folder structure where M-Files has content based structure. Secondly one of major features is that it enables integration with filters to search within Drawing Documents, most …
Chose M‑Files
We demoed 3 different tools, and our user group unanimously chose M-Files over the others for its user-friendly interface.
Chose M‑Files
We chose M-Files because they have a very high capterra.com rating, a large install base, and excellent Gartner ratings.
Chose M‑Files
I've compared recently with Box, but they still predicate their storage on WHERE instead of WHAT, which means if it isn't in a specific folder, you won't find it. Some documents may relate to multiple projects. In M-Files instead of putting a copy of a file in many folders …
Chose M‑Files
The customization ability seemed to be a level above and easy to navigate and available options are constantly being reinvented. We have used OnBase for years and now desire to move away from this option for a number of reasons.
Chose M‑Files
This is a good choice for any organization.
Chose M‑Files
M-Files is a great ECM platform that has many of the bells and whistles companies are looking for for a casual and easy to use enterprise content system.
Chose M‑Files
M-Files is considered as document management system. However, we started with M-Files using it as application and data management platform. We planned the meta data structures well and now we benefit from it as we start using M-Files as document management system. We considered …
Chose M‑Files
They have closer functions, but in my opinion, M-Files has many more features for document handling. Only GreenDocs has more capabilities related to Engineering, and if your company needs a solution for this area, this would be the best application. M-Files supports more …
Chose M‑Files
M-Files' pricing and strong feature set helped to make the decision.
PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
It is the only platform we have used. We never seriously evaluated any other platform before implementing PowerDMS. We had first-hand reviews from our police department and a neighboring fire department.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Seems better as we can add training.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Did not review or compare any others. PowerDMS was already in place at each of the organizations where I have used the system.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
We have not reviewed or utilized any other such programs. Through networking and others using their own software found, we found that Power DMS was best suited for our organization and went forward off that. As we continue to use PowerDMS and learn, we can further progress our …
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
The consulting group only uses PowerDMS.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Our previous document product was Image Silo. It was a stable-enough product, but was strictly an indexed filing system. PowerDMS goes well beyond indexing (which it does very well) and provides countless more features and functions as described above. I would describe the …
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
We did not compare PowerDMS with others. For CALEA, there is only one option, which ended up not being a bad thing.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
We used to utilize Lexipol for policy review, but moved to Power DMS because of some of Lexipol's limitations. Power DMS is just a much more robust program. There are so many uses and features beyond simple policy collection and management. Their Success community and Champions …
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
I cannot remember the programs I searched for prior to deciding on PowerDMS since it has been 5 years.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Power DMS was the only product we looked at. Being that it was pushed positively by CALEA and is one of their tools used to successfully manage accreditation it was a no brainer the support from Power DMS was also A+ they worked with us throughout our initial set-up.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
Our department was created in 2017. We copied another department by using PowerDMS. It worked for them and it has serviced us beyond expectations.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
I have not used any other systems like PowerDMS. We have a training management system that allows us to store documents but not in a way that makes it easy to pull the documents or highlight key portions.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
This is the first product we've utilized.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
None, all of our accreditation files and policy were in hard paper copy prior to the implementation of PowerDMS.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
We found PowerDMS to be the most well-rounded solution for our agency - and the most highly recommended by other customers.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
I have not used any other systems aside from PowerDMS, but I don't feel that I need to. I'm pretty happy with this.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
We did review one other software product to help with out accreditation management, however, that did not offer anything like PowerDMS.
Chose PowerDMS by NEOGOV
In the past, I have used a variety of both internally developed programs and external software programs for both accreditation management and document tracking. PowerDMS has been a superior product. It is a very robust platform that is easy to learn with endless benefits to the …
Best Alternatives
M‑FilesPowerDMS by NEOGOV
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Tungsten Capture
Tungsten Capture
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
M‑FilesPowerDMS by NEOGOV
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.6
(0 ratings)
4.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
M‑FilesPowerDMS by NEOGOV
Likelihood to Recommend
M‑Files is great for companies with multiple locations. Drive letters can become cumbersome to use and collaborate with colleagues and M‑Files fills that gap. The check out/check in system is great and allows only one editor at a time. This can be good and bad depending on the situation.
Read full review
Getting 100% signature compliance on policy updates used to take months but since automating out policy management updates in PowerDMS, we can get 100% compliance in as little as 2 weeks. Internal requests for things such as training, purchases, etc used to be pushed up the chain of command via a paper copy and would often get misplaced or lost in a full mailbox. Using PowerDMS to automate those requests put the power back in the requester's hands and increased transparency and accountability across the organization.
Read full review
Pros
  • Version control and history tracking on documents.
  • Search ability to filter content for a team, creator, or another property.
  • Permission control, limit access to documents to read or edit, or only specific workflow states.
  • Administrative control to access all content.
  • Administrative control to restore deleted content.
  • Administrative control to audit and retag content when needed.
  • Robust workflow capabilities.
Read full review
  • PDMS is extremely user-friendly from both the administrator aspect and the user.
  • The workflow process is awesome and easy to set up.
  • PDMS's support team is barred none. We've never had issues with reaching out to find a simple solution to our challenges.
Read full review
Cons
  • More user friendly customization options that do not require knowledge of coding/scripting. For example, prompting the creation of a new document from a template in a workflow.
  • When using the 'insert property' feature in a Word doc, I would love to convert dates from a mm/dd/yy format to be written out (such as September 21, 2018). Or possibly even just to pull the year or the month from a selected date to insert into a document.
  • I've often wished that I could find more detailed tutorials online for some features.
Read full review
  • The Workflow process in PowerDMS is not as easy to grasp as some of the other concepts and requires a little more explaination, especially for non-administrative background users.
  • Users are unable to view the steps in a Workflow template in order to determine which Workflow would work best for their needs when routing documents.
  • It would be great to have multiple message options for past due inbox notifications in addition to the options for past due tasks to encourage users to go to their inbox to review their messages.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
M-files meets our almost all needs, we dont have other option to replace m-files. it saves lots, like Hardware because of Vault Feature means we can create many vaults (mini-servers) in m-files in other solutions we need more hardware for more installations.
Read full review
I have had nothing but positive experiences with PowerDMS from day one. If we ever run into a situation we are unsure of, PowerDMS support has ALWAYS been able to answer us basically immediately. I really love that they are constantly seeking to improve and expand.
Read full review
Usability
It is a powerful system that can locate content fast and effectively. The system takes quite some time to setup initially. It can be hard for M-Files support to know how businesses operate and how they want to use the system in a way that works for them. The customization makes it great for companies to cater to their own needs. Once the system is set up in a way that makes sense for the business, the user experience is positive. There is room for improvement in the notifications, workflow, and support areas.
Read full review
While not necessarily user-intuitive, with a small amount of dedication to training and learning how the system functions, it becomes very usable. I would say that the usability scale is quite user-dependent. For a standard user that just needs to review and sign documents, it is very easily used. On the other end, management does a bit more of a learning curve.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
always there.
Read full review
Never had an issue with PowerDMS not being available. Speed is an issue from time to time
Read full review
Performance
I noticed some lagging with the integration with Microsoft Office but not so much that I would not use it. It has gotten better with updates. to be fair the issues were when Office 2013 first came out.
Read full review
We use PowerDMS in the cloud so our performance might be different from other users who use on-premise. The program has always been up with very minimal downtime and always seems responsive and snappy when navigating the UI and searching documents. We don't currently have any integrations with other software.
Read full review
Support Rating
Usually when I need help from them I got support and it was very good and focused to solve my problem. I didn't have so many problems, but when used it worked. I just would like to have a support in my native language, but I can understand that sometimes is hard for the companies.
Read full review
I just wish we had some in-state support. The contacts I have had with customer support have been great. Awesome communication, problem-solving, and support. I have talked to and met Stephanie Williams (CSA for Power DMS) at the most recent Entrust conference. She was professional and devoted time to addressing our agency needs.
Read full review
In-Person Training
We had online conference call training with a recording to use later as needed
Read full review
In-person training works really well.
Read full review
Online Training
They answer all questions and record your training for later use.
Read full review
Online training works well and keeps from having to have classroom training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The key insight is that the most important thing is to have a open mind. The application is easy to use, but if you have a company with different views and it is not aligned could be a huge problem. So the company transformation is required together with the application. Ensure to use as much as possible the capabilities of the application helps to have best ROI.
Read full review
Implementation of PowerDMS was near seamless. The product was able to input existing policies and procedures within a few hours, which helped to lay the foundation for future use. Having PowerDMS on-boarding readily available was also a huge benefit.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I've compared recently with Box, but they still predicate their storage on WHERE instead of WHAT, which means if it isn't in a specific folder, you won't find it. Some documents may relate to multiple projects. In M-Files instead of putting a copy of a file in many folders (thus having many copies) you can build out the relationships, so there is only 1 copy of a document which prevents multiple "originals" from being developed separately.
Read full review
Our previous document product was Image Silo. It was a stable-enough product, but was strictly an indexed filing system. PowerDMS goes well beyond indexing (which it does very well) and provides countless more features and functions as described above. I would describe the difference between our previous product and PowerDMS like the difference between the library and the Internet. Both contain information, but on is limited, while the other has it all.
Read full review
Scalability
do so much more than we need but has all the stuff we do need.
Read full review
Because of features and functions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The price we pay for M-Files is about one third less than the price that we were paying our previous vendor plus we have a custom-built amazing dependable system with great support.
  • From a compliance and legal standpoint, our policies are always available to end users including easy access to previous versions.
Read full review
  • Created efficient processes for approving document revision
  • Migrated what originally was a paper system to electronic
  • Accessible for any employee by logging in, employees do not have to seek out policy and procedure binders, and updated documents can be automatically sent to inboxes when updated.
Read full review
ScreenShots

M‑Files Screenshots

Screenshot of M-Files - SearchScreenshot of M-Files - Profile openScreenshot of M-Files - PermissionsScreenshot of M-Files - Process mapsScreenshot of M-Files - Pinned items