Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP Business One

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV) is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. The technology is based on the Navision product acquired by Microsoft in 2002. This product is the best-selling Microsoft ERP platform, and is often used by companies in the manufacturing and distribution verticals.
$8
per month per user
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
SAP Business One
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business One is an integrated enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses, The product encompasses functionality around sales, customer relationships, inventory, operations, financials and human resources.
$99
per month
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Editions & Modules
Dynamics 365 Business Central Team Members
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Essentials
$70
per month (billed annually) per user
Dynamics 365 Business Central Premium
$100
per month (billed annually) per user
No answers on this topic
Limited
$99.00
per month
Starter
$110.00
per month
Pro
$132.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Microsoft Dynamics GP feels a bit more user friendly and intuitive than NAV. However, NAV will definitely win the gold on the ability to integrate and connect with other software and technologies, especially as the company grows. We are having a tougher time training employees …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is more robust and extensible than NetSuite. NetSuite wins out on visual presentation and user based reporting flexibility. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central wins out on integration and financial integration as well as power of …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
As compared to others Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is more advanced in terms of features and tools available along. In terms of pricing it gives a fight with the competition. Make it the ideal choice as its easy to use and for streamlining operations across multiple …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
BC is MUCH easer to setup and to use. The support offering for BC is much better.
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
MS Dynamics NAV is a powerful tool in terms of functionality as it provides financial management, supply chain, project management, service, and CRM capabilities. It has a very reasonable price compared to the other tools that are well overpriced. It also provides several …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
I have personally supported all of the Dynamic family of ERP systems and made the decision to concentrate on NAV as the solution of choice. From a support and development standpoint there are few if any packages that can compare. It is not uncommon for most of the companies …
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Business Central wasn't out then. Nav, the predecessor, was out, but its user interface was dated until 2009, when the role-tailored client came out; it was much better afterwards. If your company has manufacturing, then Business Central is the way to go. It's unfortunate that …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Because GP doesn't do CRM we have looked at D365 Customer Engagement for our field service, and F&O as a replacement. Vaporware, no direct upgrade path, and if you want to continue with GP for your back office and just use Field Service it's an insanely complex integration …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
At the time of purchase, Microsoft Dynamics GP seemed more appropriate and more in sync with the needs of our company. The software was more responsive, user-friendly and it allowed for more flexibility with the way it was intended to be used. We were also promised better …
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
SAP Business One
Chose SAP Business One
SAP Business One is one of the best ERPs for a medium or small business in the market today. It has a wide variety of modules and it is really easy to use and set up. You can trace every transaction and know what user performs it, at what time, and in which date, for all your …
Chose SAP Business One
SAP Business One is more user and budget friendly.
Features
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
6.9
10 Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
SAP Business One
9.9
12 Ratings
29% above category average
Pay calculation7.210 Ratings6.319 Ratings10.011 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.38 Ratings5.915 Ratings10.09 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.29 Ratings7.518 Ratings9.510 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
24 Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
SAP Business One
9.8
40 Ratings
28% above category average
API for custom integration7.623 Ratings2.526 Ratings9.738 Ratings
Plug-ins7.821 Ratings6.021 Ratings9.937 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.9
28 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.1
40 Ratings
14% below category average
SAP Business One
9.7
44 Ratings
15% above category average
Single sign-on capability8.924 Ratings5.932 Ratings9.636 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.927 Ratings8.240 Ratings9.943 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
29 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
36% below category average
SAP Business One
8.9
45 Ratings
19% above category average
Dashboards7.525 Ratings3.529 Ratings8.640 Ratings
Standard reports7.829 Ratings6.239 Ratings9.145 Ratings
Custom reports7.928 Ratings6.539 Ratings8.941 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.4
29 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
39% below category average
SAP Business One
5.9
46 Ratings
26% below category average
Accounts payable8.828 Ratings6.445 Ratings9.746 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.627 Ratings5.936 Ratings9.945 Ratings
Global Financial Support7.816 Ratings6.07 Ratings9.428 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.315 Ratings4.721 Ratings8.831 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.418 Ratings4.726 Ratings9.638 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.818 Ratings4.117 Ratings9.436 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.719 Ratings6.219 Ratings9.641 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings4.628 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings2.919 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings3.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings2.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings3.814 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
25 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
SAP Business One
9.3
45 Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking8.425 Ratings6.324 Ratings9.645 Ratings
Automatic reordering8.017 Ratings1.013 Ratings9.731 Ratings
Location management8.421 Ratings4.018 Ratings9.941 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings4.615 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.0
27 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
SAP Business One
7.8
43 Ratings
0% below category average
Pricing8.424 Ratings3.518 Ratings9.541 Ratings
Order entry8.724 Ratings3.521 Ratings9.843 Ratings
Credit card processing6.916 Ratings1.012 Ratings8.524 Ratings
Cost of goods sold9.021 Ratings5.225 Ratings9.542 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.612 Ratings5.49 Ratings9.933 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings3.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings3.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.2
19 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
7.3
39 Ratings
2% below category average
Billing Management8.217 Ratings00 Ratings9.534 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management8.418 Ratings00 Ratings9.830 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.313 Ratings00 Ratings9.323 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting8.215 Ratings00 Ratings9.528 Ratings
Period Close8.118 Ratings00 Ratings9.535 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
8 Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
7.0
19 Ratings
8% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting10.08 Ratings00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Project Costing10.07 Ratings00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Cost Capture10.08 Ratings00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Capital Project Management8.05 Ratings00 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance10.06 Ratings00 Ratings7.014 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition8.04 Ratings00 Ratings6.116 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.5
11 Ratings
7% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.9
17 Ratings
24% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling7.310 Ratings00 Ratings9.616 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers6.910 Ratings00 Ratings9.413 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality6.99 Ratings00 Ratings8.312 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools6.710 Ratings00 Ratings9.110 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.9
8 Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.4
16 Ratings
13% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management6.78 Ratings00 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.8
15 Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.5
19 Ratings
19% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared6.99 Ratings00 Ratings9.612 Ratings
Contract Authoring6.79 Ratings00 Ratings10.013 Ratings
Contract Repository7.19 Ratings00 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated8.013 Ratings00 Ratings9.515 Ratings
Supplier Management7.212 Ratings00 Ratings9.514 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.2
11 Ratings
22% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.5
11 Ratings
25% above category average
Risk Repository6.810 Ratings00 Ratings9.29 Ratings
Control Management7.010 Ratings00 Ratings8.910 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments6.910 Ratings00 Ratings8.99 Ratings
Issue Detection7.210 Ratings00 Ratings8.910 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.68 Ratings00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.5
9 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
7.9
25 Ratings
14% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization6.97 Ratings00 Ratings9.417 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management6.97 Ratings00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.57 Ratings00 Ratings9.315 Ratings
Fulfillment Management7.39 Ratings00 Ratings8.718 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.77 Ratings00 Ratings9.216 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.9
9 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
8.8
21 Ratings
17% above category average
Production Process Design8.77 Ratings00 Ratings8.519 Ratings
Production Management8.48 Ratings00 Ratings10.019 Ratings
Configuration Management6.97 Ratings00 Ratings8.515 Ratings
Work Execution8.77 Ratings00 Ratings8.917 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs8.19 Ratings00 Ratings9.117 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
11 Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
7.8
27 Ratings
9% above category average
Forecasting6.811 Ratings00 Ratings8.425 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.911 Ratings00 Ratings8.127 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.111 Ratings00 Ratings7.921 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.9
8 Ratings
21% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP Business One
9.5
19 Ratings
27% above category average
Proposal Management7.47 Ratings00 Ratings7.515 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.17 Ratings00 Ratings9.217 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.4 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(29 ratings)
6.0
(51 ratings)
8.5
(50 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.9
(7 ratings)
4.6
(9 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(9 ratings)
6.0
(7 ratings)
8.7
(14 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
9.0
(11 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
2.8
(24 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business One
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is well suited for inventory management in all aspects. Its accessibility, along with my other apps, when out of the office is unparalleled. I find it easy to work with on a desktop or laptop; however, it could use some work on a mobile device.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
SAP
SAP Business One would be more useful if it contained tools to acommodate the growing need of online sales. A more complete shipping module which handles tracking numbers with the common couriers would be great. A built in warehouse management system would be great designed to be used with barcode scanners
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Automate the creation of bills of materials for production. We can now generate a BoM from a sales order.
  • Organization of all data pertaining to thousands of parts, assemblies, and finished goods. Engineering and purchasing have a common portal.
  • We can create sales orders from quotations instead of re-entering them (this did require some bolt-on software). Less redundant work with fewer entry errors.
  • Accounting can provide reports based on specific criteria stored in NAV. We can pull better and more detailed intelligence.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
SAP
  • SAP Business One is more suitable for small and medium scale enterprises
  • SAP Business One is : analytics, mobile technologies, cloud technologies
  • SAP Business One has exceptional performance in handling business functions such as purchasing and operations and customer relationship management
  • An important key features of SAP Business One is Reporting and Analytics.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Some functions could be a bit more user friendly, intuitive.
  • Better migration from previous ERP software (especially other Microsoft products). "Growing pains" associated with change?! Maybe.
  • A few redundancies and procedural missteps on menus and tabs can make the portal a bit crowded.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
SAP
  • Following a bench mark process - this seems contradicting to flexibility however we have wished we could follow more of an industry benchmark. Our challenge as a small company has been knowing how to properly use the system. We have discovered that we have set up the system wrong based and are using it improperly which has cause a lot work to correct.
  • Better live reporting options - current we are on prem SQL. Yes SAP is moving to HANA however smaller companies like ourselves are not ready for that. We need to be able to maintain our existing SQL DB. We also have a demand for live BI Reporting. It has been difficult to do this with our current set up.
  • Error handling - have found it very difficult to troubleshoot. Errors are not always clear and answers are hard to find.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
We've already decided to continue using this software. It is too expensive for us to upgrade so we made a workaround by using the virtual computer with Windows XP installed on it. We did research replacing this software, but it was a better financial decision to keep what we had instead
Read full review
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
SAP
As I said before, it is a first level tool, well developed, and with very strong development support, although the learning curve, its implementation, the cost-benefit ratio, the price and the user experience is not the most suitable for small and medium-sized companies. It is a company with extensive experience, market positioning, technical support and expanded use
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Best in terms of reporting or coming up with a great dashboard. Seamlessly collaborated with teams without depending on particular device as its web version is the buddy for people with work flexibility. Licensing price and integrations can be the areas of improvement and can simplify the interface which will be easy for a new user.
Read full review
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
SAP
I would like to give 8 out of 10 rating for SAP Business One because SAP Business One is a good choice for the mostly used business management solutions for the small and medium-sized companies. SAP Business One can help in optimizing the existing business process and enables streamline business processes for the daily activities for all users across the entire organization. The importance realization of SAP Business One implementation is based on the selection of the good reputation partner and its approach for the entire implementation. SAP Business One is a user-friendly and easy to use Enterprise system that the organization can benefit its features and functionalities by utilizing it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
The SAP Business One software is up and running every time
you need it as it was planned. In more than 6 years that we have been
using the product, it has never been unavailable and if it ever was, it was because of a planned maintenance window scheduled in the company.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
SAP Business One performance depends mostly on the speed of your internal servers, should you have the solution on premise as we do. Sometimes the system tends to be a little slower for some users when others are executing really big reports of performing some batch loads, but generally, the performance is acceptable to all the users.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
It provides one to efficiently be able to manage bookkeeping and inventory without much challenges. One can easily navigate through workflow processes while managing usages and budgets. Being able to produce reports in Word, Excel or PDF means one is able to have a working document to produce trends and graphs or produce pivot tables.
Read full review
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
SAP
I rate my experience with SAP Business One's support team as excellent (10). They are easy to contact and effortless to work with on any issue or concern. I like the support SAP provides for any of their products. SAP has a great backing and I would recommend them to any of my colleagues.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
The training I get was a consultant level training, so it's basically a 6 weeks training covering every aspect and every module of the system. It covered most common use cases and exercise training so you can get along with the software, as well as examples so there culd be a better understanding.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Over the past two years SAP has added a great deal of new SAP Business One on-line training for version 9.0 and 9.1. Most of the training is very strong, but some is difficult to understand and follow. Additionally, SAP still has a few holes in their on-line training around Production, Bill-of-Materials, MRP and Service.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
SAP
These implementations are not easy. Even a standard implementation can be difficult. With a never-been-done-before implementation, the implementation team and the user team need to be thorough with planning, make a decision on key points, and stick to them before any design happens. Our biggest challenge was not from StellarOne, rather it was from the mid-implementation decisions from our internal team. StellarOne did a great job warning us, implementing our decision, and then helping us adjust our SAP to handle the new direction we took.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I have personally supported all of the Dynamic family of ERP systems and made the decision to concentrate on NAV as the solution of choice. From a support and development standpoint there are few if any packages that can compare. It is not uncommon for most of the companies that I support to only call me once or twice a month after the first year. This is due to the ease of tracking down problems and errors and the ability for a developer to provide the end-user with routines that automatically correct the most basic kind of error
Read full review
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
SAP
SAP provides the most robust solution, with modules available for all department managers and even options for customization according to the company's special needs. We especially used the Crystal reports options to provide reports for each module. Overall, even if it's not the least expensive option, it has the best value for money.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
SAP
For most small businesses, the only way you outgrow SAP Business One is if the nature of your business changes radically. Going from 1 to 50 users is quite easy with SAP B1. Going beyond 50 may require moving to the Hana SAP B1 platform to maintain or improve performance, but the path is there.
Add-ons to SAP B1 can also be added as specific needs are encountered that are not closely met by the standard product. These may be required early in the product life because of the nature of your business, or as you expand the use of SAP B1.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Automation processing, including EDI functionality, has increased employee efficiency and prevented the need for adding additional employees.
  • Implementation of the warehouse functionality, including cycle counts, has resulted in better inventory control/less shrinkage.
  • Implementation of e-Ship and e-Receive, has resulted in greater efficiency and order accuracy.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
SAP
  • Employee efficiency has definitely increased with SAP Business One. This is attributed in a lot of ways to information visibility. Our employees are able to gather the data they need, quickly, and effectively.
  • Identifying inconsistencies in pricing has also been accomplished through use of reporting off individual tables. Previously, we weren't able to access our data in such a way as to enable us to write custom reports in-house.
  • We have also benefited greatly from having a single source of all business information. We utilize SAP Business One exclusively in-house. All documentation is attached to specific orders and Business Partners, as well as serialized equipment that has been sold.
Read full review
ScreenShots