TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Dynamics 365

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics 365 is a CRM providing sales, marketing, and service functionality. It is offered as SaaS and on-premise. Dynamics 365 is part of the larger Dynamics suite of business intelligence and ERP products.

    $44

    per month

    MongoDB

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AMongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster.

    $0.10

    million reads

    PostgreSQL

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/APostgreSQL (alternately Postgres) is a free and open source object-relational database system boasting over 30 years of active development, reliability, feature robustness, and performance. It supports SQL and is designed to support various workloads flexibly.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Dynamics 365MongoDBPostgreSQL
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Shared
    $0
    per month
    Serverless
    $0.10million reads
    million reads
    Dedicated
    $57
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Dynamics 365MongoDBPostgreSQL
    Free Trial
    YesYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Fully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Dynamics 365MongoDBPostgreSQL
    Considered Multiple Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Dynamics 365
    I have also used some bespoke systems, which were much better than any of these. Microsoft Dynamics 365 was selected by senior management, against advice from technical experts. The products I could find in the list were also expensive and inefficient; Microsoft Dynamics …
    Incentivized
    MongoDB
    Chose MongoDB
    Looking into PostgreSQL happened post move to Mongo. Had we considered both options at the time we likely would have went with PostgreSQL. We may migrate at some point in the future but currently it doesn't make sense.
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    We wanted to try something which is not a relation DB and has more of distributed architecture. MongoDB turned out to be a great choice.
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    We have [measured] the speed in reading/write operations in high load and finally select the winner = MongoDBWe have [not] too much data but in case there will be 10 [times] more we need Cassandra. Cassandra's storage engine provides constant-time writes no matter how big your …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    Both Couchbase and MongoDB are document-oriented NoSQL databases, so they have very similar features. While they do have some fundamental differences in terms of how they scale, shard, etc. the one key reason why we went with MongoDB is its availability and support from the …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    The flexible structure underlying MongoDB's construction is not found in other competitors; the ability to easily change the structure without affecting other stored documents. It is very ideal for projects that you cannot predict that the structure will change this way. Of …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    MongoDB is the most reliable and fastest for storing document-based data. It has a place among the most popular DB's these days.
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    MongoDB is our go-to database solution for any project, and the more we work with it the more we love it. Some say that NoSQL is pointless... Our developers wholeheartedly disagree, because they love working with it. Though both NoSQL and SQL have their purposes, in most …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    Your default choice should not be MongoDB in my opinion. Most user-facing systems are relational by nature so a well known and reliable SQL database would be easier to maintain and simpler to develop long term. If you highly value speed of development go with Firebase. If you …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    We tend to choose MongoDB when we're faced with a particular situation: we know that we need a NoSQL database in general, and want an open-source implementation that allows us to prevent against platform lock-in. Amazon's new DocumentDB product even allows us to choose to use …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    MongoDB is the best NoSQL database out there. There are others, but Mongo has the largest community, is very easy to set up, and is extremely performant. Compared to a relational DB (like MySQL or Postgres) is like comparing apples and oranges. One isn't better or worse than …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    MongoDB is very easy to use and the best advantage is the NoSQL database. No concept of the relational database.
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    I recently tried out Firestore from the Google firebase family of development products. While it allows structuring of data similar to MongoDB, it handles things a little differently. MongoDB documents are incredibly flexible and can be structured really any way you can …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    - Mongo had a query language
    - Mongo could be run easily on my laptop
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    We find MongoDB is an easily adoptable NoSQL database.
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    MongoDB is my only NoSQL database that I have used. I have used SQL databases and don't find them as enjoyable. I code in full stack JavaScript and it blends perfectly with this. I know that there are competitors in this space, and I need to take time to try them all out. I …
    Incentivized
    Chose MongoDB
    I selected MongoDB because it works for well with web interfaces. All of the RDBMS alternatives would have required a lot more time writing schemas and working around retrieving data and mapping it. That could have been somewhat mitigated with Entity Framework, but that again …
    Incentivized
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    Chose PostgreSQL
    MySQL is a popular open-source alternative to PostgreSQL, but in my experience it lacks the robustness, durability, and flexibility of PostgreSQL. It has also changed hands frequently, so support isn't the greatest. MongoDB and other NoSQL databases are helpful in certain …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    Despite being all open source options, what ended up making us choose PostgreSQL was the robustness of its core, which allows the great workflow that can support timely and efficient response to the demand and demand for resources. In the case of MongoDB, it is a non-relational …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    The features between these database are quite comparable - except for possibly MongoDB. MongoDB being a different type of database and geared towards big data - I don't compare it to PostgreSQL. The other two I have used and would say PostgreSQL does fairly well when compared …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    First It's open source and it's cost-effective compared to other databases.PostgreSQL can be easily integrated with numerous platforms. It is well known and appreciated so relying on it as our system database can be easily accepted by our customers. And if your developing a …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    When we were originally evaluating Redshift we ran into some issue with dates. Either way, Postgres is a better choice than Redshift because it avoids vendor lockin. We ended up choosing Postgres over MySQL because it was easier at the time to get a hosted Postgres cluster up …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    Much more mature and stable when compared to MySQL with features such as MVCC, complex subquery plans, ORDBMS, and NoSQL support. With Oracle retaining rights to MySQL its future as an open database is less secure and is no longer in the hands of the community. PostgreSQL also …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    PostgrPostgreSQL as a transaction db engine against oracle and sql server works well. TPM wise compared to MySQL and MariaDB, on an evan scale.
    SQL function supports, far outweighs compared to MySQL and MariaDB. PG Extensions allow for flexibiltity and scalability. Allows …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    We selected PostgreSQL due to the number of employees who have used it in the past.
    The data consistency guarantees.
    The multiple transaction isolation levels support.
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL outperforms every other option. It is faster, more flexible, more reliable, easier to maintain, and more consistent in behaviour than any of the other offerings.
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    It's a viable alternative, with a rich feature set and a reliable system. PostgreSQL is one of the best RDBMS's currently on the market in 2020, it serves just as well as a starter, PoC DB for any software idea as a final, highly valuable database solution for big systems.
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL is the proper tool when data consistency matters and other BASE or document-based databases are simply improper. I think PostgreSQL has a fantastic system of slony replication, triggers, and other data maintenance functionality that other databases generally don't …
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    I found PostgreSQL to be better compared to MySQL. The community support is very good. Some features that I feel are not present in MySQL are:
    • No referential integrity.
    • No constraints (CHECK).
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    Compared to MySQL, it works well if you need to extend to your use case
    Compared to Spark, it works better w.r.t development time in a central database setting
    Like Redis, it cannot be used for caching and quick access of non-structured data
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    As I said, Postgres and MySQL are open source which is important for small start ups. Oracle is EXPENSIVE :)
    Postgres is faster than MySQL (Big factor)
    MySQL supports replication which makes it more scalable.
    Incentivized
    Chose PostgreSQL
    I am currently using MySQL and it is difficult to notice much of a difference at all. For free relational databases, there hasn't been enough for me to choose a clear winner. If you're already using a free solution, there would be no reason to change. In terms of comparing to a …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    88%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    32 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    87%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    32 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    88%
    Happy with the feature set
    23 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    32 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    25 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    82%
    Implementation went as expected
    18 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    31 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft Dynamics 365MongoDBPostgreSQL
    Sales Force Automation
    Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    7.7
    84 Ratings
    2% below category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Customer data management / contact management7.981 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow management7.980 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Territory management7.160 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Opportunity management7.672 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)7.879 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract management7.961 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Quote & order management7.258 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interaction tracking8.171 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Channel / partner relationship management7.362 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Service & Support
    Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    8.0
    68 Ratings
    4% above category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Case management7.863 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Call center management7.950 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Help desk management8.557 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Marketing Automation
    Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    7.9
    78 Ratings
    2% above category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Lead management7.672 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email marketing8.171 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    CRM Project Management
    Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    8.0
    76 Ratings
    4% above category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Task management8.171 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Billing and invoicing management8.054 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting8.065 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    CRM Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    7.6
    77 Ratings
    1% below category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting7.667 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pipeline visualization7.773 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable reports7.476 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    7.7
    80 Ratings
    1% above category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Custom fields7.678 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom objects7.572 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scripting environment7.956 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    API for custom integration7.861 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    8.8
    75 Ratings
    5% above category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability8.869 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions8.770 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Social CRM
    Comparison of Social CRM features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    7.7
    44 Ratings
    2% above category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Social data7.843 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Social engagement7.643 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrations with 3rd-party Software
    Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    7.2
    65 Ratings
    5% below category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Marketing automation7.665 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Compensation management6.834 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform
    Comparison of Platform features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    6.8
    56 Ratings
    11% below category average
    MongoDB
    -
    Ratings
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Mobile access6.856 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 and MongoDB and PostgreSQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365
    -
    Ratings
    MongoDB
    10.0
    39 Ratings
    16% above category average
    PostgreSQL
    -
    Ratings
    Performance00 Ratings10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability00 Ratings10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency00 Ratings10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security00 Ratings10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility00 Ratings10.039 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings10.038 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Dynamics 365MongoDBPostgreSQL
    Small Businesses
    Salesflare
    Score10 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    MariaDB Platform
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Kintone
    Score9.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    MySQL
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Oracle Sales
    Score8.9 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    SQLite
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics 365MongoDBPostgreSQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.9
    (104 ratings)
    10.0
    (79 ratings)
    8.3
    (56 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (20 ratings)
    10.0
    (67 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.8
    (34 ratings)
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    8.3
    (9 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (11 ratings)
    9.6
    (13 ratings)
    9.3
    (7 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.2
    (4 ratings)
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    3.8
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Dynamics 365MongoDBPostgreSQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Provides our company access to manage and customize the folds tailored to our needs. We needed to have certain paragraphs on certain paperwork per customer. MD 365 has those options to customize where needed and remove when not. The system is easy to navigate, and training can be done in a matter of days, even without prior knowledge of the system or similar systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    If asked by a colleague I would highly recommend MongoDB. MongoDB provides incredible flexibility and is quick and easy to set up. It also provides extensive documentation which is very useful for someone new to the tool. Though I've used it for years and still referenced the docs often. From my experience and the use cases I've worked on, I'd suggest using it anywhere that needs a fast, efficient storage space for non-relational data. If a relational database is needed then another tool would be more apt.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    PostgreSQL is best used for structured data, and best when following relational database design principles. I would not use PostgreSQL for large unstructured data such as video, images, sound files, xml documents, web-pages, especially if these files have their own highly variable, internal structure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Best to use for AP - like in our organization, there are plenty of AP bills, so with Dynamics, we can quickly enter the same into the Excel utility, which means CSV-based upload, and then we can easily upload the same to the software. It's a time saver.
    • Best for Bank reconciliation - MS Dynamics makes Bank reconciliation easy. Banks can easily sync with software and easily get reconciled.
    • Generating invoices to customers and directly sending them to their inbox is easy with this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • Being a JSON language optimizes the response time of a query, you can directly build a query logic from the same service
    • You can install a local, database-based environment rather than the non-relational real-time bases such a firebase does not allow, the local environment is paramount since you can work without relying on the internet.
    • Forming collections in Mango is relatively simple, you do not need to know of query to work with it, since it has a simple graphic environment that allows you to manage databases for those who are not experts in console management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    • It works well with external data sources and runs on platforms with stable performance.
    • Clients can rest assured that their personal information will be safe and secure.
    • Many forums discuss setup and usage, and most are free.
    • Adding tooling applications to a computer is unlimited.
    • PostgreSQL runs on many OS platforms and supports ANSI SQL, stored procedures, and triggers.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Small learning curve, obviously. You won't figure this out in a day, a week, or even a month. But given time, you can learn to be an expert. Or you can always get a consultant or hire in somebody. But learning the tool isn't out of the questions by any means.
    • Licensing can be confusing at times and isn't cheap, but it is cheaper than Salesforce. Plus no additional fees for data calls to better integrate your D365 CE data with other systems.
    • The Classic user interface left a bit to be desired, but now with the much-improved Unified Interface, the web client and the mobile client look the same, much more modern, and have more flexibility and power behind them for customizers as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • An aggregate pipeline can be a bit overwhelming as a newcomer.
    • There's still no real concept of joins with references/foreign keys, although the aggregate framework has a feature that is close.
    • Database management/dev ops can still be time-consuming if rolling your own deployments. (Thankfully there are plenty of providers like Compose or even MongoDB's own Atlas that helps take care of the nitty-gritty.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    • Clearer indications on what is the query plan, to optimize the query
    • More out of the box, Postgres specific, SQL functions
    • It would be nice to have a more visual aid of the relationship between all tables, but possibly this depend more on the UI used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    CRM has allowed us to keep all of our data in one place that is easy for all users within the company to view. I came into the company after they had been using CRM for about 4 years. They have all said that since we have used this it has helped us control work processes better, it has allowed us to be able to track things so much better, and has been something that has helped unite many processes that used to be all over the place. We are currently using CRM 4.0 and are planning on upgrading in the next 18 months to the 2011 version. Support for 4.0 is almost all but dried up. Understandably so. Some of the customization we have done, and a plugins we use, are now contained within the 2011 version so we are looking forward to that upgrade. We use an email marketing company as well, and they primarily support the 2011 version, but their product connects and is integrated within CRM. This is a great benefit as well so that all of our marketing information can be contained in one location.
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    I am looking forward to increasing our SaaS subscriptions such that I get to experience global replica sets, working in reads from secondaries, and what not. Can't wait to be able to exploit some of the power that the "Big Boys" use MongoDB for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    As a needed software for day to day development activities
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    The usability is easily adopted for users familiar with other Microsoft products. Dynamics 365 has several interfaces that cross over browsers and tablets. These multiple interfaces will be phased out and updated to a single unified interface eventually to provide the same usability across all devices. The backend configurations is slowly improving with the introduction of PowerApps compared to pre-D365 Online versions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    NoSQL database systems such as MongoDB lack graphical interfaces by default and therefore to improve usability it is necessary to install third-party applications to see more visually the schemas and stored documents. In addition, these tools also allow us to visualize the commands to be executed for each operation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    Postgresql is the best tool out there for relational data so I have to give it a high rating when it comes to analytics, data availability and consistency, so on and so forth. SQL is also a relatively consistent language so when it comes to building new tables and loading data in from the OLTP database, there are enough tools where we can perform ETL on a scalable basis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    PostgreSQL's availability is top notch. Apart from connection time-out for an idle user, the database is super reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    The data queries are relatively quick for a small to medium sized table. With complex joins, and a wide and deep table however, the performance of the query has room for improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Our partner, Ledgeview Partners has been FANTASTIC to work with. They are always timely in their response and have taken time to understand our business and our specific needs. We've made a lot of advanced customizations and they have been a great help in making those updates.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    Finding support from local companies can be difficult. There were times when the local company could not find a solution and we reached a solution by getting support globally. If a good local company is found, it will overcome all your problems with its global support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    There are several companies that you can contract for technical support, like EnterpriseDB or Percona, both first level in expertise and commitment to the software.
    But we do not have contracts with them, we have done all the way from googling to forums, and never have a problem that we cannot resolve or pass around. And for dozens of projects and more than 15 years now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    The online training is request based. Had there been recorded videos available online for potential users to benefit from, I could have rated it higher. The online documentation however is very helpful. The online documentation PDF is downloadable and allows users to pace their own learning. With examples and code snippets, the documentation is great starting point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    We used a data warehouse to house our data, and our IT team and implementation vendor worked diligently ahead of time to construct idea implementation plans. Out of millions of records- we had less than a dozen errors, which is remarkable. My major insight is simply having a group of completely devoted individuals working towards your goal who fully understand the desired outcome. Focused resources for implementation season are critical to success.
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    While the setup and configuration of MongoDB is pretty straight forward, having a vendor that performs automatic backups and scales the cluster automatically is very convenient. If you do not have a system administrator or DBA familiar with MongoDB on hand, it's a very good idea to use a 3rd party vendor that specializes in MongoDB hosting. The value is very well worth it over hosting it yourself since the cost is often reasonable among providers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    The online documentation of the PostgreSQL product is elaborate and takes users step by step.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Dynamics was part of a system overhaul for a local school, and we looked at many products. If we had used it for a company with low turnover, then it might have been more feasible. They needed something a new person could learn quickly, someone who might also be learning marketing terms at the same time - especially if there is nobody to train the individual now expected to know the system. Similar issues occurred with all of these programs (we called it being too big for their britches), and one of the bigger things we liked was that it is more compatible with MS Office products in both technical and visual appeal. If you have a steady employees who use a CRM consistently, low turnover, and those who are very familiar with Office products, Dynamics would be the smartest option for you. Unfortunately, this was just not true for the school environment
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    We have [measured] the speed in reading/write operations in high load and finally select the winner = MongoDBWe have [not] too much data but in case there will be 10 [times] more we need Cassandra. Cassandra's storage engine provides constant-time writes no matter how big your data set grows. For analytics, MongoDB provides a custom map/reduce implementation; Cassandra provides native Hadoop support.
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    Although the competition between the different databases is increasingly aggressive in the sense that they provide many improvements, new functionalities, compatibility with complementary components or environments, in some cases it requires that it be followed within the same family of applications that performs the company that develops it and that is not all bad, but being able to adapt or configure different programs, applications or other environments developed by third parties apart is what gives PostgreSQL a certain advantage and this diversification in the components that can be joined with it, is the reason why it is a great option to choose.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Microsoft
    On our purchase, I'd been interrogated about our usage. Our needs are met by Microsoft Dynamics 365, which is simple to use. With so much data and information available, we must ensure that it is presented correctly to managers. Due to a lack of use, we don't have to spend as much money on Salesforce.
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    The DB is reliable, scalable, easy to use and resolves most DB needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Microsoft
    My company's preferred program right now is Microsoft Dynamics 365. We use it to keep track of customers and important sales metrics in a streamlined manner. Anyone familiar with CRMs will find the tool extremely useful. Considering that we have a good turnover, this product will be used for its basic segments. As a result, there are few chances of error with Microsoft dynamics because it is so easy to use. Many options for recording data on these leads are available. It meets our needs and pays off.
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • For those without a centralized, all in one solution for major HR, Finance and other departments, Microsoft Dynamics 365 has vastly improved employee time utilization and profit.
    • Migrating clients from on-premise to the cloud has reaped benefits including better security, no unscheduled downtime and frequent updates to functionality.
    • Those transferring from cheaper solutions have lost money in the aim to be better integrated with other Microsoft products and AI they don't really utilize.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    MongoDB
    • Open Source w/ reasonable support costs have a direct, positive impact on the ROI (we moved away from large, monolithic, locked in licensing models)
    • You do have to balance the necessary level of HA & DR with the number of servers required to scale up and scale out. Servers cost money - so DR & HR doesn't come for free (even though it's built into the architecture of MongoDB
    Read full review
    PostgreSQL Global Development Group
    • Easy to administer so our DevOps team has only ever used minimal time to setup, tune, and maintain.
    • Easy to interface with so our Engineering team has only ever used minimal time to query or modify the database. Getting the data is straightforward, what we do with it is the bigger concern.
    • It's free. You can't beat that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    MongoDB Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot