Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. QuickBooks Online Advanced

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
QuickBooks Online Advanced
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
QuickBooks Online Advanced is a SaaS-based accounting software designed to scale with growing businesses. It includes the functionalities of QuickBooks Online, as well as more robust business analytics, customization, and resource management.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Online Advanced
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Online Advanced
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Online Advanced
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP

No answer on this topic

QuickBooks Online Advanced
Chose QuickBooks Online Advanced
I have no used any other accounting software.
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Online Advanced
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
QuickBooks Online Advanced
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.815 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
QuickBooks Online Advanced
7.9
108 Ratings
4% above category average
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings7.789 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings8.094 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.9
40 Ratings
17% below category average
QuickBooks Online Advanced
8.4
198 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability5.632 Ratings8.4173 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.140 Ratings8.3194 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.3
41 Ratings
38% below category average
QuickBooks Online Advanced
8.2
213 Ratings
5% above category average
Dashboards3.429 Ratings8.3201 Ratings
Standard reports6.139 Ratings8.5213 Ratings
Custom reports6.439 Ratings7.7205 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
48 Ratings
42% below category average
QuickBooks Online Advanced
8.2
218 Ratings
7% above category average
Accounts payable6.345 Ratings8.4206 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.736 Ratings8.5204 Ratings
Cash management6.336 Ratings8.4181 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.641 Ratings9.1209 Ratings
Expense management4.431 Ratings8.3192 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings7.1102 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.428 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.719 Ratings7.051 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings7.689 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.214 Ratings8.296 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings8.9120 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings7.6114 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings8.591 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.718 Ratings8.092 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.626 Ratings8.4188 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.716 Ratings7.980 Ratings
Configurable Accounting3.617 Ratings8.4102 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.314 Ratings8.976 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.119 Ratings8.4143 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
26 Ratings
52% below category average
QuickBooks Online Advanced
6.3
85 Ratings
15% below category average
Inventory tracking5.624 Ratings6.385 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module3.615 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
25 Ratings
69% below category average
QuickBooks Online Advanced
6.8
144 Ratings
8% below category average
Pricing3.718 Ratings6.8105 Ratings
Order entry3.721 Ratings6.594 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings7.2123 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.09 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.412 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Online Advanced
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 4.5 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 4.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Intuit Enterprise Suite
Intuit Enterprise Suite
Score 9.1 out of 10
Intuit Enterprise Suite
Intuit Enterprise Suite
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Business One
SAP Business One
Score 8.6 out of 10
SAP Business One
SAP Business One
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Online Advanced
Likelihood to Recommend
4.0
(54 ratings)
8.2
(220 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
9.8
(20 ratings)
Usability
5.4
(10 ratings)
8.3
(16 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.1
(4 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
7.4
(10 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(4 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.7
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(4 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPQuickBooks Online Advanced
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Intuit
As described in my detailed list of improvements prior, I wish the system would upload bills and other things and separate out the line items on the bill instead of only finding the total. QuickBooks Online Advanced doesn't currently do this. I also wish that linking a bank account worked better than it does currently. This is why I have not given this rating a 10.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Intuit
  • Budgeting is easy to input. Our entities have multiple departments, so using classes to separate and report the results of each department is important.
  • Reports are easy to customize to provide meaningful data to the board and department managers.
  • QuickBooks Online Advanced has a large market share of accounting software in use, so it is relatively easy to find new employees with prior experience with QuickBooks Online Advanced.
  • Able to open both entities at the same time, which is helpful due to the number of transactions between the two entities.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Intuit
  • Continued growth around AI usage and tool.
  • There are still some reporting gaps that make setting up custom reports not absolutely top-tier.
  • There can be a lot of UI clutter as different features keep getting turned on. Can become harder to navigate.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Intuit
It has become second nature to use Quick Books at the company. If you need a report you log in and pull the report. It helps expedite reconciliation of bank accounts, the automation of most tasks make it easy to get mundane tasks completed quickly.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Intuit
QuickBooks Online Advanced is highly usable and intuitive for most day-to-day financial tasks. Its interface is clear, and core functions such as invoicing, reconciliation, and reporting are easy to perform. While some advanced features like report customization or integrations can be less straightforward, overall the platform offers a smooth and efficient user experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Intuit
In the 5 years I have been using it, I cannot recall there ever having been an outage or not being able to access the system. Sure, there are issues with internet speeds sometimes that are unrelated to Intuit but it is a very reliable system.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Intuit
Since we do not integrate the software with other systems, I do not have any issues with speed related to that. Pages tend to load pretty quickly, but there are times when reports or other pages take a little longer to load than usual. It is not an overly frustrating amount of time, though, and it happens infrequently.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Intuit
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Intuit
The online training is good enough.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Intuit
I did not participate in this part particularly much. The implementation was simple and easy to perform. There were not any major issues that arose during the process. QuickBooks has made the processes pretty streamless and I believe they had anticipated many difficulties ahead of time. This was easy enough
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Intuit
QBO is great because it does accounting very well, and it can integrate well with everything. I appreciate that it has third-party integrations with many other software companies, so we can focus on doing our accounting through QuickBooks while adding other software as needed through those integrations.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Intuit
Software is very flexible
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Intuit
  • Spreadsheet sync reduces manual data entry significantly. Exporting data into my customized Excel workbook that has complex formulas and macros for automating makes uploading changes and reconfiguring easy and convenient, saving a lot of time.
  • Automating AP approval has reduced lost paper copies, improved internal controls, and reduced audit findings.
  • Having banking connections has improved cash flow management, streamlined credit card expenses and reconciliation. I have found that utilizing it for my primary operating account actually makes things more difficult and can easily double-post payments, so I avoid using it on the checking account. It has been well for the credit card account, though.
Read full review
ScreenShots