Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPVena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPVena
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPVena
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
The only product with have shopped was Sage Intacct. It is somewhat unfair to compare the two solutions, because Sage Intacct is a cloud-based solution. That said, Intacct appears to advertise better reporting/business intelligence capabilities. MS Dynamics GP should be aware …
Vena
Chose Vena
We did not evaluate any other products. We knew we wanted to embrace, not replace, excel, and Vena is best in class as a CPM tool that leverages Excel as a lens into the database.
Chose Vena
We had Prophix (old version) for planning and budgeting and it was way less user-friendly and flexible than Vena.
We always had to go back to Excel to build more complex reports and share them.
And we extended the use of Vena to monthly reporting, which could not have been done …
Chose Vena
I did not select Vena, and would not after popping the hood. It looks slick at a glance and has a good concept going, but once you begin to investigate further, there are a lot of foundational issues. Have your IT department perform a deep dive before making a decision.

I have …
Chose Vena
We were using Dynamic Budgets before we moved over to Vena and researched many, many, many other products before settling on Vena in the end. One of the things that quickly knocked out other vendors was our unique fiscal calendar. We have 13 periods (4 weeks each) and that …
Chose Vena
Assuming a staff-member has excellent MS Excel skills, Vena Solutions is (most likely) capable of producing just about anything one can imagine. That said, Excel's visuals leave something to be desired. Most folks would choose a Tableau dashboard over a Vena dashboard any day. …
Chose Vena
At the end of the day, many of Vena's competitors will offer more web-based capabilities. At the time when we made the decision, we primarily chose Vena due to the steeply discounted price tag. However, over the past couple of years, Vena has added the web-based capabilities …
Chose Vena
We spent about a year and a half in the selection process for our budgeting system. The issue that we kept coming across was speed, flexibility, and a lack of understanding of our process during the sales cycle. Most of these other products wanted us to change our budgeting …
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPVena
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.319 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.915 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.832 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.240 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Dashboards3.529 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.239 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.539 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.445 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.836 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.528 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.819 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.818 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.726 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.816 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting3.917 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.714 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.5
26 Ratings
48% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking6.124 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.315 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Vena
-
Ratings
Pricing3.618 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.621 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.225 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.29 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.712 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.47 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
7.9
172 Ratings
3% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.1108 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.1155 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.5163 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
287 Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.4274 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.3274 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.2107 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.0244 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
229 Ratings
0% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.6130 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.1168 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.0191 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.1170 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.2
159 Ratings
10% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.7142 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.6117 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.5133 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings7.971 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
276 Ratings
0% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.2261 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.3262 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.4262 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.4125 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.4202 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
141 Ratings
4% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.9136 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.4122 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
346 Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.6313 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.7332 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings8.5320 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.9287 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings8.2323 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
300 Ratings
7% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings7.5262 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings6.9195 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings6.7178 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings7.6175 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings5.9125 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings7.3223 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.4263 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
326 Ratings
5% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.4294 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.4305 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.1316 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.5247 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings7.099 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
259 Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.3220 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings9.1166 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings8.4193 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings7.9207 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.2189 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings7.8147 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Vena
8.2
316 Ratings
0% above category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.8258 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.0297 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.7234 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPVena
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 5.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPVena
Likelihood to Recommend
4.1
(54 ratings)
8.5
(342 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
8.9
(26 ratings)
Usability
5.5
(10 ratings)
8.8
(38 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.6
(10 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(9 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
8.8
(106 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
8.2
(10 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(6 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.5
(9 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(6 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPVena
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
It’s great for achieving flexible outcomes amid ever-changing desires among its user base. We have not implemented AI into our finances quite yet, but this seems very promising for working more efficiently in analysis and narrative prep. It works great for constant real-time data and allows us to make decisions on the fly.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • The Admin function of Vena, being able to set up the users in the user categories and the different groups and assigning the groups and the task bindings, is particularly easy and very helpful because as we have so many different departments and disciplines in our organization, we do need to establish pretty specific user access so this process works really well for us.
  • Running reports in Vena is fairly easy, and we do enjoy being able to just push a button and get some budget versus actuals.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Create an bottom-line functionality.
  • Have another license between power user and contributor that allows building reports that aren't ad hoc, but don't have all the admin rights of a power user.
  • Have a session on best in class Workforce Planning prior to implementation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena has become an integral part of finance and our daily process. Without it we would take longer to prepare results and decisions will be delayed. Vena has given the whole organization more visibility of results and budgets so that all departments participate more actively in managing their budgets rather than it being the sole responsibility of finance.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
I love this product. We integrate all of our financial needs between finance and the operations team so that we have real time data being looked at all of the time. Our operations can reach out and be able to discuss possible issues or variances at any time of the month and leads us to be able to have smoother month end closes.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
Vena is seemingly always available. They plan maintenance windows well in advance and always off hours (typically over a weekend) and communicate clearly throughout maintenance about what will be affected. Over 5 years of using the product, I can only remember one time when the platform was unavailable (I believe due to an underlying server hosting issue from their provider), and they resolved the issue and had everything up and running again within 8 hours.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
The performance is dependent on how much data and calculations are involved and how complex the security settings are. A simple template or report loads in seconds. A complex template or report can take a while. If there are many users with complex security settings, that will be a factor in the load time.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
If I had to rate the overall support for Vena based on my experiences, I would give it a 9 out of 10. The support team is very responsive, providing best assistance during both the implementation phase and ongoing use of the Vena. They have been proactive in offering training resources and addressing me very well, which significantly enhances the user experience and overall satisfaction with the Vena.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
This is the best way to learn and buy-in. The in person effect gives students both a hands on approach but an instruction to be there to customize assistance and understanding. In person also builds greater buy in with your future team on creators. However if your audience is better at on line learning this is another good option.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Vena Solutions
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena is Excel-based, which is what our users wanted. Pigment was web-based, like Adaptive, but our users did not fully trust or adopt it. Adoption drives success for any software. Amy's software, which is not adopted, has a negative ROI by definition. Vena was the right choice for us.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Vena Solutions
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Vena Solutions
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard