Mitel MiCollab is a collaboration and conferencing tool for enterprises, from Canadian company Mitel.
N/A
Whereby
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Norwegian company appear.in offers their flagship video conferencing platform to small teams, both in a free edition hosting up to 4 guests simultaneously in a session or a paid edition that supports up to 12 simultaneous meeting guests, among other features.
$0
per user
Pricing
Mitel MiCollab
Whereby
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per user
Pro
$9.99
per user
Business
$59.99 and up
per user/room
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mitel MiCollab
Whereby
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mitel MiCollab
Whereby
Features
Mitel MiCollab
Whereby
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Mitel MiCollab
5.5
14 Ratings
34% below category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Task Management
6.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
6.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
3.96 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
Search
3.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Mitel MiCollab
6.3
15 Ratings
24% below category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Chat
6.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
3.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Mitel MiCollab
6.3
11 Ratings
24% below category average
Whereby
-
Ratings
Versioning
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
7.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
3.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
4.19 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
6.79 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Mitel MiCollab
-
Ratings
Whereby
7.8
14 Ratings
1% below category average
High quality audio
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
High quality video
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
00 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Mobile support
00 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Mitel MiCollab
-
Ratings
Whereby
8.0
13 Ratings
1% above category average
Desktop sharing
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Whiteboards
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Mitel MiCollab
-
Ratings
Whereby
9.4
13 Ratings
14% above category average
Calendar integration
00 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Meeting initiation
00 Ratings
9.010 Ratings
Integrates with social media
00 Ratings
9.72 Ratings
Record meetings / events
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Slideshows
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Mitel MiCollab
-
Ratings
Whereby
8.3
9 Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Audience polling
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Q&A
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
If you're in an area that has highly trained technicians to support the Mitel MiCollab product - I think your experience will likely be much better than ours. In my opinion, Frontier (and Integra before them) were the worst, and we do not look back on that experience with much happiness.
If you cannot use another more common solution on the market or are looking for an alternative to the known solutions, it is a great alternative. If you have other tools already, and just want to test [them], that's fine, but I think the better-known ones have a better chance of using, knowing, and the learning curve will be shorter.
The paid version may have dial-in. But I have always used the free version. Dial-in is typically required for an "official" multi-purpose teleconference platform.
I did have some trouble with larger groups (5+) when it was Appear.in but almost always use it for small 1-on-1 or 3 person meetings.
We are using a larger tool suite that already includes video conferencing instead of our older approach of using different apps from different vendors. appear.in has a simple but great set of features but its pricing scheme is not as scalable as we really need in a 500+ employee company.
It is easy to you for existig Mitel UC users, who are familiar with the Mitel way of things, but for green field enterprises, might be a ramp up period which in most cases would not be worth it as its competitor TEAMS is much easier and intuity to use.
Initially, support from Mitel was fantastic, but recently it has started to lag significantly. Response takes 8 hours, at a minimum, usually requiring a second call to spur a response. Email support is even worse (email in a ticket) - I have had to call in to get things running the 3 times I've tried to email support.
Never had to contact support, so we cannot give a rating for their overall support. When we noticed the audio was not always great quality, we simply educated our users to mute the mic and use the in-room conference phone which is connected via a dedicated VOIP link and had much better voice quality. The video performance varied by locations network speed and found it got much worse when the room size increased to over 4 connections.
MiCollab was great as a VOIP solution and general team collaboration solution, but it lacked in some areas, such as the mobile app, complex configuration and set up as well as the lack of user customization. Overall, the system is serviceable, but seemed rather vanilla compared to its competitors
I find Zoom more complicated to use and harder to use because a lot of people do not like having to download things to their computers or devices and Whereby is so easy to get connected with . I like that Zoom offers larger rooms, but at this point the cost is not worth the extra expense.
This product was competitively priced when originally purchased. We will need to evaluate whether to replace it when it approaches the end of life or simply upgrade it.
Users typically only use the phone system because the collaboration tools have been superseded in functionality by other tools.