Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MySQL
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
MySQL is a popular open-source relational and embedded database, now owned by Oracle.N/A
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP Cloud ERP (formerly SAP S/4HANA Cloud) is a modular ERP that enables users to run mission-critical operations in real time from anywhere, introduce new business models in any industry, and expand globally. SAP Cloud ERP is a SaaS product and can also be deployed in a hybrid landscape for quicker time to value.​ ​​ SAP Cloud ERP is a foundational component of theN/A
Microsoft SQL Server
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database.
$1,418
Per License
Pricing
MySQLSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Subscription
$1,418.00
Per License
Enterprise
$13,748.00
Per License
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MySQLSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPer user, per month
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MySQLSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Considered Multiple Products
MySQL
Chose MySQL
I have also used Microsoft SQL Server. It is quite similar to MySQL. However, MySQL has always been my first choice, I have been using it for a very long time. I have also worked with PostgreSQL in a DevOps project. It is good too but a bit hard to learn and understand.
Chose MySQL
Having used both PostgreSQL and Microsoft SQL Server, I can tell that MySQL performs admirably in a Linux setting. When compared to Microsoft SQL Server, the extra benefit is the minimal or nonexistent licence fee. We find that MySQL's programming interface is particularly …
Chose MySQL
In terms of capabilities, Microsoft SQL Server is one of the leaders in the database market. It provides a lot of features for high availability, disaster recovery, performance and security. The primary reason why MySQL 8 was chosen was due to the open source nature of the …
Chose MySQL
Is not a drop-in replacement for any of the things listed above. MySQL has it's purpose and use-cases, same as those. It's a low-cost solution for high read/low write applications and works very well when used in the right circumstances. Support can be purchased from various …
Chose MySQL
Rest all the big brand databases incure high licensing cost giving almost the same value that MySQL is giving being an open source database. Other databases like Oracle, MS SQL servers need extensive resource along with a huge team to manage those databases. However, thats not …
Chose MySQL
We chose MySQL because of its open-source nature and its compatibility with various systems, languages, and databases. It is easy to use and fast. Additionally, it has been in the market for more than 30 years now which makes it a reliable option when compared to its …
Chose MySQL
As I have been commenting in our company, we have solved our performance problems and responses obtaining speed in the queries occupies less disk space, in addition to its price and all the tools of great Scope it possesses.
Chose MySQL
We let go SQL server as We don't want to use Windows server and bare the cost of Windows licensing.
Chose MySQL
MySQL is open source and reduces development costs drastically.
Chose MySQL
MongoDB has a dynamic schema for how data is stored in 'documents' whereas MySQL is more structured with tables, columns, and rows. MongoDB was built for high availability whereas MySQL can be a challenge when it comes to replication of the data and making everything redundant …
Chose MySQL
Microsoft SQL and SQLite i have used for different scenarios. SQLite is very small database which is more easy to work with low profile devices like mobiles. MySQL is not suitable for that level and MSSQL mainly comparable with MYSQL. MSSQL has complex installations and …
Chose MySQL
So the main reason i would stack up Mysql from rest of the others is that it is open source which can be helpful for doing any POC on the products and learning new technologies and it is also compatible with all other softwares like Microsoft SQL serve and Postgre Sql
Chose MySQL
I would say that in a Linux environment MySQL works great compared to both PostgreSQL and MS SQL. The added benefit compared to MS SQL is the low or absent licensing cost. As we use it mainly from PHP the programming interface is great for MySQL. PostgreSQL has many of the …
Chose MySQL
MySQL is relatively easier to use and than PostgreSQL or SQL Server; it's also cheap to use in production compared to SQL Server. For a beginner who wants to ship something quickly, MySQL is really suited for it.
Chose MySQL
MySQL offers best conditions for a rapid adoption at the organization.
Also because it's free software, you can scale up in implementations without worrying about licenses fees.
Chose MySQL
MySQL has most of the functionality of other, very costly, alternatives without the big price tag. It is open-source with improvements coming at a relatively good rate. It is not as robust as those other offerings and can have some challenging points at scale for large …
Chose MySQL
Microsoft SQL can be considered as an enterprise level software since it is recommended for large businesses. Microsoft SQL has some unique categories like big data processing, DBMS, etc. whereas MySQL is not capable of handling such features. I guess this is how these both …
Chose MySQL
I've been using MySQL for so long that it's my go-to RDBMS. I really like MySQL Workbench in conjunction with MySQL. I've experimented with Amazon DynamoDB in my personal time.
Chose MySQL
MySQL has a GUI which makes it easy for developers to work upon. It has all features like replication, backup and crash recovery. Also since it is freely available it becomes commercially feasible for people to use this DB. Also MySQL can be easily used as a back end for the …
Chose MySQL
MySQL provides the option to reduce support and maintenance cost when P0 Level 1 support is not really needed for databases used for noncritical use cases and workloads. Other versions that include Microsoft SQL, Amazon RDS, etc don't provide such options and are overkill. …
Chose MySQL
Easy to use.
Cost-effective.
Integration with development tools.
Chose MySQL
Familiarity: With MySQL, I know what to expect, and that goes a long way. Also, since it adheres fairly close to SQL '92, It's relatively easy to construct queries, views, etc. without a steep learning curve. Also, RAM usage is important (this is true of any RDBMS …
Chose MySQL
First of all, it's free and open source and MySQL supports more programming languages. The MySQL query syntax is easier to learn compared to other database management software. It also works perfectly with Linux or Unix servers. But compared with others, MySQL runs slow on …
SAP Cloud ERP
Chose SAP Cloud ERP
Oracle is complicated and difficult and complex to maintain where as SAP S/4HANA Cloud is easy to maintain and user friendly interns of administration.
Chose SAP Cloud ERP
SAP S/4HANA Cloud provides variety of options compared to Azure. Also the consolidation of all different factors in one single system is helpful for people in the organization.
Chose SAP Cloud ERP
The SAP S/4HANA Cloud in-memory feature makes SAP S/4HANA Cloud much faster than previous storage based databases. Also, with storage based databases there is frequently a need to expand drives or add SAN drives which leads to extra expense. We selected SAP S/4HANA Cloud …
Microsoft SQL Server
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
The major factor in favor of Microsoft SQL Server as compared to Oracle DBMS is its cost for small to medium enterprises. For larger organizations, Oracle DBMS's value is in being a bit more competitive but when it comes to smaller organizations, Microsft SQL Server is much …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
SQL Server is better for large databases containing structured relational data. It makes it easy to group and order, to sum and create tables of data from any data stored in a table or related tables. While Dynamodb is very good at STORING huge amounts of unstructured data, it …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
We used MySQL for some smaller projects because this RDBMS works better with a small amount of data and a lot of young workers, especially students, can handle MySQL very well because they learned it at the university. One important thing to keep in mind is that MySQL is …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
[Microsoft] SQL Server has a much better community and professional support and is overall just a more reliable system with Microsoft behind it. I've used MySQL in the past and SQL Server has just become more comfortable for me and is my go to RDBMS.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
The first database application taught when I was in school was Microsoft SQL Server. Microsoft SQL Server was used where I first started, so I had the opportunity to improve myself in MySQL. SQL is also used in my current workplace. It is widely used in very large projects due …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL is slower than MySQL and Access but far more feature-rich and reliable. Access is almost obsolete nowadays, so not too many people are considering it, but unless budget or an open-source ethos is a factor, Microsoft SQL is superior in every way. Many commonly used …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
You could consider i did use MySQL since i worked with some websites that were using a MySQL database. I could not give a side by side comparision since i don't use those like i use the Microsoft SQL , but so far it worked well. I prefer Microsoft SQL due to support and info …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
UI of the Microsoft SQL Server makes it easy to use and learn. The better technical support and documentation give it an extra edge over other databases. The Microsoft ecosystem provides additional advantages, as we can seamlessly use other Microsoft products, such as Power …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server is faster and more compatible, but it does cost more, so you're paying for those features. I use the others in many other places where critical transaction processing time and compatibility aren't of great concern.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server providers a more user friendly experience when it comes to Microsoft SQL Server components management via its unique SQL Server management Studio. It is also a production ready, resilient, highly available and tested database management system (DBMS). The …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
MS SQL Server is easier to use compared to other RDBMS which really speeds up development time and relatively easier to find a problem when it happens as well. It's also pretty quick to run a query, especially in a large table make it pretty convenient if we need to monitor the …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
It just boils down to why learn anther product when you are going to run across it so seldom. Developers determine what database engine I am going to need so I just tend to pick products for implementation that use a well know product that has lots of support resources …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
[Microsoft SQL Server] offers a full solution, Inhouse Applications and hosted application continue to use SQL as backend database. Allows easy creation of development environments and continuous feature release.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
The free version is very powerfull and easy to install and use for small companies.
Going to Professional and Standard, gives you all the support and the flexibility needed. It is known within the Database Administrator crew, and you can get support very easily over the …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Native to Windows and being required for other MS apps puts it above others in terms of usage. If we were not heavily dependent on Microsoft applications or OS, we might have considered other database solutions. It's an expensive solutions but it is a solid reliable solution. …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server is still the industry standard for the type of development we do, and the types of applications that we use. Almost every developer or analyst we hire has at least a reasonable grounding in the use of SQL servers, and it is almost universally compatible …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
For our enterprise software, SQL Server has more predictable functionality and tools than the other products we've examined. If we have a question or a problem, it's quite likely someone else has had to deal with the same thing, and it's possible to find help or tips online …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Language/syntax slightly different than MS SQL.
Seems reasonable for small data sets.
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
For a single vendor solution, SQL Server is the best choice in my opinion. Most of the other solutions do not offer the full range of products in a single package. Also, for a largely Microsoft shop, there are additional integrations which increase the value proposition. …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server is a DBMS that can be used in any situation, from small projects to big ones, and the latest versions now can be used in several OS platforms. It is a great product with many features over its competitors. It's a mature and robust product. It's easy and …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Compared to free versions, SQL Server just blows away the free/open-source software. Things just run faster, and better, and at less overhead. This is truer and truer with the later versions. Microsoft just invests so much into research and development into their product. And …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Amazon Redshift is a cloud-based data warehouse. It does what it says it will do, but my experience is that for a cloud data warehouse, it is a little slow and I'd hope for performance to be insanely fast. Plus, it is also very costly. Same performance for much less cost in …
Chose Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server stacks up pretty well - it is well established and has a large userbase. The main reason we selected Microsoft SQL Server over any other RDMS was because of its well established place in the market for such tools and large number of users (easy to hire …
Features
MySQLSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.1
408 Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pay calculation00 Ratings7.8358 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.9346 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.6345 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.7
626 Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.8600 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings7.6553 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
721 Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings8.4678 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.1710 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.7
728 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings7.7673 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.8715 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings7.6661 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
750 Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Accounts payable00 Ratings8.2729 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.2694 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings7.9247 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings8.0260 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings8.0279 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.0255 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings8.3287 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.3
628 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking00 Ratings8.3614 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings7.9532 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings7.9507 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.2
640 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pricing00 Ratings8.0610 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings8.0620 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings9.024 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings8.2585 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings7.9209 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.5
273 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Billing Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.9246 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings7.5208 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings8.0267 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.3
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.1
115 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings8.1115 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.9
226 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings7.8155 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings7.9159 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings7.7154 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.1202 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings8.0200 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.8
1 Ratings
39% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Risk Repository00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.0
182 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings8.1160 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.9155 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings7.7143 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings8.2146 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.0147 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
8.2
177 Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Production Process Design00 Ratings8.2160 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings8.3162 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.2152 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings8.1157 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.1157 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
7.8
213 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings7.7189 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings8.0204 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings7.7193 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
MySQL
-
Ratings
SAP Cloud ERP
9.0
194 Ratings
22% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Proposal Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.0194 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MySQLSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Small Businesses
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SQLite
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SQLite
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MySQLSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(146 ratings)
8.4
(706 ratings)
8.0
(107 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(5 ratings)
9.5
(17 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(18 ratings)
8.0
(604 ratings)
7.6
(17 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(3 ratings)
6.6
(78 ratings)
7.9
(26 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.5
(9 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.7
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
MySQLSAP Cloud ERPMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
MySQL is best suited for applications on platform like high-traffic content-driven websites, small-scale web apps, data warehouses which regards light analytical workloads. However its less suited for areas like enterprise data warehouse, OLAP cubes, large-scale reporting, applications requiring flexible or semi-structured data like event logging systems, product configurations, dynamic forms.
Read full review
SAP
Does well Manufacturing companies - E2E integration. Product Costing integration with manufacturing. Order to Cash - E2E integration, Joule, and openness to integrating third-party products. Less appropriate AI capabilities - competition is moving faster. E2E professional services business as business is evolving faster, and new ideas are coming in at a fast pace.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft SQL is ubiquitous, while MySQL runs under the hood all over the place. Microsoft SQL is the platform taught in colleges and certification courses and is the one most likely to be used by businesses because it is backed by Microsoft. Its interface is friendly (well, as pleasant as SQL can be) and has been used by so many for so long that resources are freely available if you encounter any issues.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • Stable - it just runs, with minimal downtime or errors
  • Fast - well-structured data is quickly written and read
  • Secure - MySQL is easy to keep data secure from people and applications that shouldn't see it
  • Easy to use - SQL is industry standard so no problems with adding, editing and reading data stored in MySQL
Read full review
SAP
  • The software helps in forecasting and identifying potential challenges that would affect our organisation in the near future. This enables us to prepare in advance and also adopt practical and viable measures.
  • It enables faster and accurate data processing, which enhances decision-making.
  • It's easily customizable according to specific organizational needs. This promotes overall efficiency and productivity of the organization.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Easy to configure and use with Visual Studio and Dot Net
  • Easy integration with MSBI to perform data analysis
  • Data Security
  • Easy to understand and use
  • Very easy to export database and tables in the form of SQL query or a script
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • Learning curve: is big. Newbies will face problems in understanding the platform initially. However, with plenty of online resources, one can easily find solutions to problems and learn on the go.
  • Backup and restore: MySQL is not very seamless. Although the data is never ruptured or missed, the process involved is not very much user-friendly. Maybe, a new command-line interface for only the backup-restore functionality shall be set up again to make this very important step much easier to perform and maintain.
Read full review
SAP
  • The beginner's user-friendly UI can help learners learn easily, and it feels a bit complex.
  • Implementation of AI bot on common tasks.
  • There are no offline functionality that users can use remotely.
  • As the scalability of the products grows, they become more expensive.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise edition has a high cost but is the only edition which supports SQL Always On Availability Groups. It would be nice to include this feature in the Standard version.
  • Licensing of Microsoft SQL Server is a quite complex matter, it would be good to simplify licensing in the future. For example, per core vs per user CAL licensing, as well as complex licensing scenarios in the Cloud and on Edge locations.
  • It would be good to include native tools for converting Oracle, DB2, Postgresql and MySQL/MariaDB databases (schema and data) for import into Microsoft SQL Server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Oracle
For teaching Databases and SQL, I would definitely continue to use MySQL. It provides a good, solid foundation to learn about databases. Also to learn about the SQL language and how it works with the creation, insertion, deletion, updating, and manipulation of data, tables, and databases. This SQL language is a foundation and can be used to learn many other database related concepts.
Read full review
SAP
The cost of SAP as an ERP is quite high and the switching costs associated with ERP systems are even higher. That being said moving from one ERP to another only happens once in a great while for large organizations. Those switching costs include retraining, IT hardware requirements, outside consultants and more
Read full review
Microsoft
We understand that the Microsoft SQL Server will continue to advance, offering the same robust and reliable platform while adding new features that enable us, as a software center, to create a superior product. That provides excellent performance while reducing the hardware requirements and the total cost of ownership of our solution.
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
I give MySQL a 9/10 overall because I really like it but I feel like there are a lot of tech people who would hate it if I gave it a 10/10. I've never had any problems with it or reached any of its limitations but I know a few people who have so I can't give it a 10/10 based on those complaints.
Read full review
SAP
Day to day data insight is more accurate for manufacturing industry to procure as per forecasted from supplier. Supply and fulfillment cycle becomes more easier. I would say more about performance as we are using this new server so we can see clear difference between SAP S/4HANA Cloud and ECC. Also it has customized business extensions for rapid development.
Read full review
Microsoft
SQL Server mostly 'just works' or generates error messages to help you sort out the trouble. You can usually count on the product to get the job done and keep an eye on your potential mistakes. Interaction with other Microsoft products makes operating as a Windows user pretty straight forward. Digging through the multitude of dialogs and wizards can be a pain, but the answer is usually there somewhere.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Its does not have outages.
Read full review
Performance
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SSAS data cubes may some time slow down your Excel reports.
Read full review
Support Rating
Oracle
We have never contacted MySQL enterprise support team for any issues related to MySQL. This is because we have been using primarily the MySQL Server community edition and have been using the MySQL support forums for any questions and practical guidance that we needed before and during the technical implementations. Overall, the support community has been very helpful and allowed us to make the most out of the community edition.
Read full review
SAP
The support system I find great as whenever I run into problems they rectify them quickly as possible they never reacted late the support is just up to the mark for me. They provide many solutions to the problems I faced the [technical] team support is always amazing they [listen] to mean work accordingly.
Read full review
Microsoft
We managed to handle most of our problems by looking into Microsoft's official documentation that has everything explained and almost every function has an example that illustrates in detail how a particular functionality works. Just like PowerShell has the ability to show you an example of how some cmdlet works, that is the case also here, and in my opinion, it is a very good practice and I like it.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SAP
More effective
Read full review
Microsoft
It was good
Read full review
Online Training
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
very hands on and detailed training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Oracle
1. Estimate your data size. 2. Test, test, and test.
Read full review
SAP
SAP requires
a lot of internal and external resources to complete its successful
implementation. The cloud version requires a deeper understanding of the
different capabilities of the local systems (hardware) and the connection
towards your local IT team. We found several problems on our systems that we
couldn't foresee before the implementation and roll out.
Read full review
Microsoft
Other than SQL taking quite a bit of time to actually install there are no problems with installation. Even on hardware that has good performance SQL can still take close to an hour to install a typical server with management and reporting services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
MongoDB has a dynamic schema for how data is stored in 'documents' whereas MySQL is more structured with tables, columns, and rows. MongoDB was built for high availability whereas MySQL can be a challenge when it comes to replication of the data and making everything redundant in the event of a DR or outage.
Read full review
SAP
The platform utilizes advanced predictive analytics to anticipate operational bottlenecks and put them out of commission before the problems become larger. We can proactively develop effective strategies that help keep service quality in the face of unexpected changes in the market, or external disruptions, by continuously analyzing historical performance data as well as elements of the current market
Read full review
Microsoft
[Microsoft] SQL Server has a much better community and professional support and is overall just a more reliable system with Microsoft behind it. I've used MySQL in the past and SQL Server has just become more comfortable for me and is my go to RDBMS.
Read full review
Scalability
Oracle
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
SQL server does handle growing demands of a mid sized company.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • As it is an open source solution through community solution, we can use it in a multitude of projects without cost license
  • The acquisition by Oracle makes you need to contract support for the enterprise version
  • If you have knowledge about oracle databases, you can get more out of the enterprise version
Read full review
SAP
  • The financial management part ensures every process is well planned and allocated resources are used efficiently.
  • The development of payroll management ensures that all employees are happily remunerated and, hence, very productive.
  • The creation of solid financial reporting acts as the primary driver in decision-making, which brings more insights into development.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Increased accuracy - We went from multiple users having different versions of an Excel spreadsheet to a single source of truth for our reporting.
  • Increased Efficiency - We can now generate reports at any time from a single source rather than multiple users spending their time collating data and generating reports.
  • Improved Security - Enterprise level security on a dedicated server rather than financial files on multiple laptop hard drives.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Cloud ERP Screenshots

Screenshot of the Order to Cash Dashboard - For the management of the order-to-cash process more efficiently across revenue streams and business models - including sales of physical and digital goods, services, subscriptions, projects, and bundles.Screenshot of a Sales Management Overview - Helps ensure sales reps meet their goals with an overview of orders and key sales performance metrics, with status tracking for each order in real time for the early detection of potential issues.Screenshot of the Purchasing Spend Dashboard - For weighing various aspects of purchasing spend through quick access to clear, complete, and real-time data, with less risk, and without opening different reports and transactions.Screenshot of Operational Supplier Evaluation - Provides a transparent overview of suppliers. Users can approve the most reliable vendors and get the right mix to serve business needs while reducing risk.Screenshot of Inventory Management - Provides visibility to manage supply chains, to mitigate risk, avoid unnecessary costs, maximize efficiency, and fulfill customer orders on time.Screenshot of Inventory Processing - Enables real-time supply chain visibility and provides meaningful metrics, with customizable dashboards and reports that display real-time inventory that track the status of inbound and outbound deliveries.