TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    NAKIVO Backup & Replication

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/ANAKIVO Backup & Replication now also supports Proxmox VE, alongside VMware, Hyper-V, Nutanix AHV, and AWS EC2. It offers replication, failover, cloud backup, backup copy, size reduction, screenshot verification, and site recovery.

    $2.50

    per month per workload

    HPE Zerto Software

    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    HPE Zerto Software aims to enable customers to run an always-on business by simplifying the protection, recovery, and mobility of on-premises and cloud applications.N/A
    Pricing
    NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationHPE Zerto Software
    Editions & Modules
    Enterprise Essentials/Enterprise (Perpetual)
    Starting at $329 per CPU socket
    Indefinite use. Includes technical support during business hours. CPU sockets
    Enterprise Essentials/Enterprise
    Starting $76 per server and $25 per workstation
    Indefinite use. Includes technical support during business hours. Server Workstation
    Enterprise Plus
    Contact vendor
    Enterprise Essentials/Enterprise (Subscription)
    Starting at $3.5 per workload/month
    Billed yearly for up to 5 years. Includes 24/7 Support. Workload/Month
    Pro Essentials/Pro (Perpetual)
    Starting at $239 per CPU socket
    Indefinite use. Includes technical support during business hours. CPU Socket
    Pro Essentials/Pro (Subscription)
    Starting at $2.5 per workload/month
    Billed yearly for up to 5 years. Includes 24/7 Support. Workload/Month
    Pro Essentials/Pro
    Starting at $58 per server and $19 per workstation
    Indefinite use. Includes technical support during business hours. Server Workstation
    NAKIVO Backup for Microsoft 365
    Starting at $0.80 per user/month
    Billed yearly for up to 5 years. Includes 24/7 Support. Microsoft 365 User/Month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationHPE Zerto Software
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsA workload is a VMware vSphere VM, Microsoft Hyper-V VM, Nutanix AHV VM, a physical machine (01 server and 03 workstations), an Oracle database, or an Amazon EC2 instance.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationHPE Zerto Software
    Considered Both Products
    Nakivo Inc.
    Chose NAKIVO Backup & Replication
    We were previously using Code42 (CrashPlan) prior to them changing their service. They no longer offered local backup as an option. We also used Zerto, but we found it painful and time-consuming to reconfigure the settings and re-sync every time we increased the volume size. Uni…
    Incentivized
    Chose NAKIVO Backup & Replication
    Nakivo is more cost effective, so it scales to smaller VM environments better than Veeam. Both are great products though.
    Incentivized
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    129 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    34 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    129 Answers
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    30 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    128 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    35 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    118 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    32 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    99%
    Implementation went as expected
    126 Answers
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    34 Answers
    Features
    NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationHPE Zerto Software
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication and HPE Zerto Software
    Feature
    NAKIVO Backup & Replication
    8.5
    153 Ratings
    1% below category average
    HPE Zerto Software
    8.3
    3 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Universal recovery7.5128 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Instant recovery7.5131 Ratings8.33 Ratings
    Recovery verification7.4137 Ratings9.33 Ratings
    Business application protection7.3116 Ratings8.73 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations8.2139 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification7.8143 Ratings8.12 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud10.0110 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression8.9138 Ratings7.73 Ratings
    Snapshots7.7129 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Flexible deployment9.3104 Ratings8.73 Ratings
    Management dashboard9.2116 Ratings9.13 Ratings
    Platform support9.6113 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Retention options9.8111 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Encryption8.2102 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Enterprise Backup
    Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication and HPE Zerto Software
    Feature
    NAKIVO Backup & Replication
    8.5
    45 Ratings
    0% below category average
    HPE Zerto Software
    8.3
    2 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Continuous data protection8.738 Ratings9.52 Ratings
    Replication9.044 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Operational reporting and analytics7.844 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Malware protection8.331 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Multi-location capabilities8.439 Ratings9.52 Ratings
    Ransomware Recovery8.738 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Disaster Recovery
    Comparison of Disaster Recovery features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication and HPE Zerto Software
    Feature
    NAKIVO Backup & Replication
    -
    Ratings
    HPE Zerto Software
    8.3
    3 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Disaster Recovery Planning00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
    Hot Sites00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Disaster Recovery Testing00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
    Automated Disaster Recovery00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationHPE Zerto Software
    Small Businesses
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Arcserve ShadowProtect
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Carbonite by OpenText
    Score7.1 out of 10
    Datto SIRIS
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Zerto on IBM Cloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationHPE Zerto Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (159 ratings)
    8.3
    (54 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (6 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (56 ratings)
    8.0
    (29 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (48 ratings)
    4.0
    (34 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    9.2
    (32 ratings)
    6.7
    (16 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (13 ratings)
    7.7
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationHPE Zerto Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Nakivo Inc.
    NAKIVO Backup & Replication is well suited for a variety of scenarios. Firstly, it is ideal for businesses with virtualized environments, such as VMware or Hyper-V, as it offers seamless backup and recovery solutions tailored to these platforms. Secondly, organizations with a mix of virtual, physical, and cloud environments can benefit from NAKIVO's ability to provide unified data protection across these platforms. Additionally, businesses requiring fast and reliable disaster recovery capabilities will find NAKIVO Backup & Replication valuable, thanks to its site recovery and orchestration features.However, there are scenarios where NAKIVO may be less appropriate. For organizations with exclusively physical infrastructure and no virtualized environments, the full range of NAKIVO's features may not be utilized to its fullest potential. Similarly, companies with limited data storage requirements may not fully benefit from NAKIVO's deduplication and compression capabilities.
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Zerto is well suited for disaster recovery and virtual machine replication between multiple data centers. DR testing for audit or regulations is much easier with Zerto, great reporting, dashboard etc. It is not well suited for physical server replication for disaster recovery or as a primary backup solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Nakivo Inc.
    • Can be installed natively on nas appliances leveraging the use of underutilized appliances. No need to install the software on Windows or Linux Servers.
    • Backup natively Vmware Virtual Machines and File Shares (you need to buy the right license modules).
    • Destination storage for backups (or of the backup copies) can be Microsoft shares, Amazon S3, Wasabi, Backblaze and remotely to other sites using their transporter vm.
    • To not overload the system with overlapping jobs, they can be chained one after the other.
    • Rapid add/remove/reorder priority of vm to backup and their backup archive. Jobs can be easily changed or chained.
    • Quick support service
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Anyone with a large disk (VMDK) knows the issues of VMware snapshots. Most backup software is a "point in time backup" that uses snapshots. While the backup can be run multiple times per day the stress of the snapshot on the host and storage is eliminated by the continuous protection of Zerto log replication.
    • A client had a the disks on a VM go missing for some reason. We had them "flip the switch" for a real fail over and press the fail over button. The VM on our DR site started to come alive as the VM at the customer site was brought down. When the DR VM was fully up, automatic reverse replication started. The DR machine was available in a few minutes (to take into account different host hardware) for access. One the vm at both sites were in sync, we had the customer again repeat the fail over process and the DR site VM was turned off and the Production site VM was brought back on line. This was a 200 GB VM and the whole process was finished in about 3 hours.
    • Zerto also allows for "Test" fail overs that can be configured on many different functions, such as host, datastore, network and IP usage. Configuring the IPs is crucial to avoid inadvertent site cross contamination of the same VM.
    • Zerto can also retrieve files from any VM disk on the DR site without starting a VM. Very handy for retrieving files or directories.
    • Since Zerto is running continuous log replication, changes on the production VM are nearly instantaneously copied to the DR site. As with any data process, having sufficient bandwidth for "churn" peaks minimizes the delay in updating the DR site.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Nakivo Inc.
    • Backups have the option of "screenshot verification". Screenshot verification doesn't always work for us when our vmtools is out of date. If we are on an older version of VMware and that version of vmtools is up to date, NAKIVO still thinks it is out of date.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Moving a VM from one protection group to another could be simplified.
    • I would like to see an executive-style report of recovery and testing for upper management.
    • The ability to deploy Zerto as a virtual appliance, without the need for a windows server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Nakivo Inc.
    It is a product that contains most of the features of its big competitors but at an affordable price for small businesses. In addition, the support is very good even if they only have support in English. Another important factor is its compatibility with NAS devices, which greatly simplifies deployment. The implementation is simple and in a matter of minutes you can define the first copy Jobs
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We really like the easy setup of this replication solution, as well as the ease of management. Not to mention, our internal IT Economist determined that the Zerto solution would provide the best ROI out of the competing solutions we analyzed. So far, his calculations have been spot on, and we have saved substantially
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Nakivo Inc.
    NAKIVO Backup & Replication is very easy to set up. I did it by myself, and it went perfectly. Online documents are very well written, and also the tech support asked to help me set it up. I want to do it by myself and the setup process is very easy to do. The connection to your VM and servers is very easy to do.
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Zerto is very easy to implement and support. Uses are broad, only issues are once something doesn't sync it is difficult to get assistance until your reach tier 2 or tier 3 support. Basic file and folder recovery is great. Live and test fail overs are also easy to implement without issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Nakivo Inc.
    The support is fast and perfect. If u have any questions, you can contact the support team via mail or chat and you always get a fast answer. You can also find a lot of help in the FAQ in the help center to resolve your problems. Anytime I had to contact the support, they helped me and solved my problem.
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Overall support is very good. We sometimes get pushback when asking Level 1 support to escalate to Level 2. This causes undue frustrations when you need a more knowledgeable support person to get involved. We've had to escalate to account reps a few times for this scenario. Zerto is very responsive and normally handles our requests very quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Nakivo Inc.
    It is very easy to do in all the formats in which it is implemented, whether as an appliance, in a windows machine, or an implementation in NAS. I only use the appliance one, but I have tried all of them in trial mode to know which one interested me more.
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Make sure the end goal is in mind before implementing. That way results meet expectations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Nakivo Inc.
    NAKIVO Backup & Replication stands out as a more cost-effective and robust solution compared to Veeam ONE. With competitive pricing and a comprehensive feature set including incremental backups, global deduplication, LAN-free data transfer, and built-in WAN acceleration, NAKIVO offers efficient data protection and optimized storage usage. Its user-friendly interface and streamlined setup process make it appealing for organizations with limited IT resources. Additionally, NAKIVO's support for VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, and Nutanix AHV further enhances its versatility. When evaluating data protection solutions, NAKIVO's affordability, robustness, and ease of use make it an attractive choice for businesses seeking a comprehensive and cost-effective backup solution.
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We started out using Backup Exec which was in service until we virtualized our environment where it didn't perform as well at the time. Then we switched to Veeam which worked well, but then as we started needing to do migrations and off-site DR, we found ourselves relying on Zerto more often.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Nakivo Inc.
    The pricing for VM backups is good value for money as it does not limit how many VM's per socket. This works well for smaller sites with simple backup requirements. Physical machine backup pricing would more attractive with a sliding scale based on the number of physical machines.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    For my organization, the pricing model was an upfront investment for the Zerto licenses. My organization prefers to pay upfront and not deal with month-to-month or year-to-year pricing models that most companies are moving to. But for some, the investment may be more than they can afford, and would prefer the year-to-year pricing model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Nakivo Inc.
    I contacted a few times Nakivo representatives, once for technical doubt and the other ones for commercial ones. Both support services are fast and reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    I mean, it was 6 years ago, but we were up and going with all applications synchronizing in short order. The longest tasks was getting the 30 TB of application data synchronized between the datacenters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Nakivo Inc.
    • One of our contributors has permanently deleted worksheets from our file server. From Nakivo, we were able to recover all the data in less than 10 minutes.
    • An authentication server was encrypted by ransomware, through NAKIVO Backup & Replication, we recover the entire server within 1 hour.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Zerto is like having the best possible insurance ... it just works, and often provides the backups taken overnight that are key in recovering data/work between overnight backups.
    • Zerto easily enabled the move of primary datacenters by allowing easy failover to a secondary site, and failback to the primary site.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    NAKIVO Backup & Replication Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    HPE Zerto Software Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotScreenshot of AnalyticsScreenshot of DashboardScreenshot of Failover TestScreenshot of vSphere