PandaDoc vs. SAP CPQ
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
SAP CPQ | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 222 Answers | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
97% Delivers good value for the price 204 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 221 Answers | 88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 174 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 182 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | BoldSign, by Syncfusion Score10 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | OneSpan Sign Score9.6 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | DocuSign Score8.7 out of 10 | Agentforce Revenue Management Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | 9.5 |
| Usability | 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.1 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 6.3 | 10.0 |
| Configurability | 2.8 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.6 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.7 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 | - |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |













