PandaDoc vs. SAP CPQ
PandaDoc vs. SAP CPQ
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $19 per user/per month | |
SAP CPQ | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation starting at $19 per month per user. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
|
|
PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | PDFfiller Score 9.0 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.7 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Adobe Acrobat Sign Score 8.4 out of 10 | SAP Sales Cloud Score 8.2 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 (270 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 (18 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 8.0 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 9.1 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 9.6 (21 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 5.2 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 6.3 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 2.8 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 9.0 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 8.6 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 9.9 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Pros | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Cons | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Usability | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Performance | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Scalability | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | PandaDoc | SAP No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |