TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    PandaDoc

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/APandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs.

    $35

    per month per seat

    SAP Fieldglass

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AA Vendor Management System (VMS) used to find, engage, and manage a global external workforce – including temporary workers, freelancers, contractors, consultants, and service workers.N/A
    Pricing
    PandaDocSAP Fieldglass
    Editions & Modules
    Starter
    $35
    per month per seat
    Business
    $65
    per month per seat
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PandaDocSAP Fieldglass
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    PandaDocSAP Fieldglass
    Small Businesses
    BoldSign, by Syncfusion
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    OneSpan Sign
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    DocuSign
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    PandaDocSAP Fieldglass
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (329 ratings)
    7.9
    (77 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (18 ratings)
    9.5
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.3
    (23 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.6
    (21 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.1
    (23 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.3
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    2.8
    (3 ratings)
    8.2
    (63 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (20 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.7
    (20 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    6.7
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    PandaDocSAP Fieldglass
    Likelihood to Recommend
    PandaDoc
    Best suited for after demonstrations when requested by the prospect when they are looking for pricing with T&C. The data room is also great that acts like a drop box for opportunities and their contacts. Helps share pertinent information with others in the organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    A well-suited case could be : a) It's valuable during audits (both internal and external ) as it documents history and clear records. Scope of Improvement could be: a) It might not be suitable where the external workforce is relatively smaller, as it could be a costly affair for them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    PandaDoc
    • Allows clients to remotely execute documents.
    • Tracks the progress of document execution.
    • Emails clients to remind them to sign documents so we don't have to follow up.
    • Emails us when documents have been fully executed.
    • Provides an easy-to use interface to place signatures, dates, and other information on our forms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • SAP Fieldglass is a VMS tool that automates sourcing and identifying supplies, reducing time and fulfilling requirements promptly.
    • Its provide us detailed visibility and compliance in hiring process.
    • SAP Fieldglass ensures company rules and legal processes during the onboarding and helps to manage the onboarding process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    PandaDoc
    • Sometimes the fillable fields don't automatically map properly and you have to manually adjust.
    • Plan tiers and pricing recently changed, so now we get less value and less features (limited templates, no more pricing tables or invoicing/connected payment) for the same price, which is pricy for a small business.
    • Easier, integrated invoicing as an included feature (so we don't have to use a different software for invoicing/payment collection) would be ideal. You have to upgrade to the Business Plan for this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Some of the accounting dropdowns/combinations are clunky and not easy to use in conjunction with each other
    • User profiles are not synched with Ariba- sometimes missing information in Ariba would cause invoices to fail/get stuck. Would be helpful to have a hard stop in SAP Fieldglass to prevent such issues
    • Additional expertise across resources would be helpful. As noted, support itself is responsive and willing. However, we would continue to go through our original implementation contact for knowledge and immediate help.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    PandaDoc
    The reason I gave it a rating of 7 is because it's probable, but not for sure. This is because there are a few little things we don't love about pandadoc. Mostly that there is not conditional logic such as: they must either fill this field out OR this one. Also it's a little pricey. But we'll probably stay because it's good enough and a pain to switch to something new
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Usage of the web interface it’s easy and user friendly. iOS app it’s quickly and simple, with just a foto it’s possible to store the invoice and system automatically recognize the expenses. Good integration with credit card company to and excellent functionality to assign the credit card expenses to relative invoice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    PandaDoc
    Once you get the hang of it, it's very easy to use. There can be a slightly steep learning curve to get fully in on the system. The new editor v2 has really improved usability and allows us to collaborate on documents simultaneously. Once the templates and library items are set up, a new document, whether it be a sales or HR document, takes very little time to complete.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Web interface and iOS app are so simple and user friendly. The functionality that recognizes the expenses working very well. The integration with a credit card company it’s a an excellent functionality that simplify a lot the expenses management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    PandaDoc
    We haven't had any real issues regarding downtime as of yet.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    PandaDoc
    The documents load quickly for the most part but sometimes if there are larger documents with a high number of variables it could take a bit longer to get the document to show up. Most of the time the document comes on the screen relatively quickly allowing for quick access to documents to be edited and sent out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    PandaDoc
    Recently I could not upload a pdf to a contract - support was very responsive and easy to work with. They got back to me the next day with an apparent fix - however when I opened the document nothing had changed. I then could not respond to the rep who was helping me because it was a "no-reply address", the problem still has not been solved and we had to make alternate arrangements to get this to the client. Never had it happen before and was only with this one contract.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Never used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    PandaDoc
    Implementation was before the time I was here at Riafox, however, support has been great in assisting to merge spaces and upgrade to 2.0 Editor.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    PandaDoc
    We used Dropbox back when it was still HelloSign. At the time, new templates were very hard to create. We had to upload a PDF and then add the fields from there. With PandaDoc, we are able to drag and drop the text, images, logos, and fields we need easily. This has saved our team an immense amount of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    SAP Fieldglass offers extensive capabilities for managing contingent workforce, statement of work (SOW) projects, and services procurement. It seamlessly integrates with other SAP products (e.g. SAP SuccessFactors, SAP Ariba) and external systems, providing a unified ecosystem for enterprises using SAP’s suite of solutions. It is highly scalable, suitable for large enterprises with complex workforce management needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    PandaDoc
    It's scalable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    PandaDoc
    • We have greatly increased the efficiency in which we can get signatures from individuals for documents and increase productivity.
    • We have been able to find older documents very easily.
    • W-9 have been very difficult due to Section 3, but this was addressed with conditional logic
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • I would have to say Fieldglass has made a positive impact, only in that having access to it has opened up some client relationships we didn't have before. I am a vendor to clients using Fieldglass, so I can't really report on the financial successes they may have had by implementing it.
    • The negative side to Fieldglass, or any VMS, really, from an agency perspective is that it cuts out manager contact. That has a negative impact, both to the agency and the hiring manager. No longer can the managers really explain what they need, and no longer can an agency understand the req deeply. We have to work off of a scrubbed job description which is generally pretty vanilla.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    PandaDoc Screenshots

    Screenshot of some of the custom-designed themes, templates, embedded rich media, and interactivity to give every deal the opportunity to get noticed.Screenshot of automatic notifications, on-the-fly editing, CRM Integrations, and integrated eSignatures.Screenshot of reporting, with drill down to the deal level with proposals, to pick which deals to include (or exclude).Screenshot of legally binding eSignaturesScreenshot of centralized communications to streamline the negotiation process, and make revisions in real-time in a single location.Screenshot of document analytics that display what’s really happening after documents are sent with real-time reporting on engagement and activity on the documents. This enables teams to respond faster to prospects.

    SAP Fieldglass Screenshots

    Screenshot of a summary of workers and requisitions, appearing within the DashboardScreenshot of the Visualizer, used to take a deeper look into analyticsScreenshot of a visualization providing workforce visibilityScreenshot of a candidate management interface, with profiles for an open role appearing.Screenshot of the interface for workforce assignment management.