The PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform is a talent management platform designed for Higher Education and Government organizations, now from PowerSchool (acquired August, 2018). Modules include analytics, applicant tracking, position management, onboarding, records management, and performance management.
N/A
SnapSurveys
Score7.8 out of 10
N/A
Snap Surveys offers both Survey Software and Feedback Management Solutions, including desktop survey software, online feedback management solutions, and survey research services. Snap Surveys offers complete tools for survey design, administration, data collection, and analysis. Snap Surveys supports all survey modes, including: Online, Mobile (including iPad/iPhone/Android), Paper, Kiosk, Phone, Scanning, and Tablet PC, in any language with robust analysis and reporting capabilities,…
$695
per year
Pricing
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SnapSurveys
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Online/Mobile
$695
per year
Paper Scanning
$2,395
per year
Paper Scanning - Perpetual License
3,995
Online/Mobile - Perpetual License
5,995
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SnapSurveys
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
SnapSurveys
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.7
8 Ratings
6% above category average
SnapSurveys
-
Ratings
New hire portal
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
5.8
3 Ratings
23% below category average
SnapSurveys
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
2.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
2.7
3 Ratings
87% below category average
SnapSurveys
-
Ratings
Performance plans
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
SnapSurveys
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
SnapSurveys
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
2.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
7.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
8.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
8.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
0% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Feature
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool and SnapSurveys
Organizations who have very few applications and/or very few positions posted are probably less likely to benefit as high from PeopleAdmin. Large organizations who have several positions and/or several applications/applicants can definitely benefit from this product. This product is not as well suited for performance management as I had hoped because there is not a lot of freedom to creating and designing different evaluations for different position types in the system when you have an organization that has thousands of different employees and types.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it is very important to go through their training videos and user guides. Devote the time to learning it correctly from the beginning. In the long run you will enjoy it much more than plowing right into it and then trying to find out if you did it right. Also, while you are not required to buy the annual maintenance contract, I think if you are going to use the program, don't skimp, buy the annual maintenance contract. The free technical support is necessary, especially when you are up against deadlines.
Applicant tracking was a good use of this tool for our department. I think it could use a few more customization features but overall it was a good tool to weed out applicants who were not qualified for the position.
The system has some canned reporting tools that also worked well for our department and management needs.
It was a great place to house our position descriptions and provided a readily accessible source for hiring managers to make requested updates and changes and for employees to see and have access to their position descriptions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PeopleAdmin's internal report writer needs work. Currently, in version 7, reporting can only be done requisition number by requisition number. The report writer needs to be modified so it can create reports enterprise-wide.
PeopleAdmin's Data Mart product needs substantial modification. In version 5.8, on a monthly basis, PeopleAdmin provided us with an Microsoft Access database containing our historical data up to that period end. In version 7, the "Data Mart" contains our historical data. The Data Mart consists of over 300 files. These files are not database table downloads nor is it parts of a database data dump. Rather, the files appear to be scrapes from html pages. They contain html codes and other character data that needs to be cleaned before they can be uploaded. The files are not in a table-by-table format. Any one file can contain data from two or more tables. The format of the Data Mart makes it difficult to load the data into a database and format it in a table structure that is comparable to the Access database provided with version 5.8.
We are evaluating our options as it relates to PeopleAdmin. We are likely to renew as we can not find another product that gives us the functionality we have with PeopleAdmin 5.8 in the area of Position Description. Outside of that, we would likely be close to finding another product solution.
I think as an organization there is always room to grow, however, this application has really helped us with our dilemma with offline, online, and paper surveys. We are able to make our surveys fun and engaging and the interface for the person creating the survey is user-friendly. Customer service is very helpful if you need additional support.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the Higher Education recruitment processes as was PeopleAdmin.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is an in between option. The options we evaluated were Qualtrics and SurveyGizmo. It's cheaper than Qualtrics and easier to design surveys than SurveyGizmo. Nonetheless it's not the worst option out there like SurveyMonkey.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info