PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Acuity Scheduling is an appointment management platform developed by the company of the same name in New York and acquired by Squarespace in 2019.
$14
per month
Pricing
PeopleFluent
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Emerging
$14
per month
Growing
$23
per month
Powerhouse
$45
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleFluent
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PeopleFluent
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
Features
PeopleFluent
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
10% above category average
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
-
Ratings
New hire portal
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
11% above category average
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
-
Ratings
Performance plans
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
4.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
7% below category average
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
29% above category average
Acuity Scheduling, a Squarespace company
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
I think any business can benefit from Acuity Scheduling. In my experience, however, and maybe I just haven’t found the correct settings yet, it’s been difficult to manage 4 business schedules with multiple employees and varying hours that change day-to-day and week-to-week. So I definitely would recommend it to more simple business models with set hours, as it seems like it would have all the functions one might need. I still would recommend to more complex businesses like mine as well, but also include discussion of some of the potential drawbacks.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
Clicking on the link opens up my calendar, which has an uncluttered look, making it easy for my prospects and clients to review their options and make their choice.
I am able to customize my schedule, the types of appointments I want to offer, and even decide how many appointments I want in a day. There are so many details that I can customize.
I can customize how my calendar and emails look for my prospects and clients so that I come across professional and coordinated. I want the look of my business, website, etc. to have a polished, cohesive, and interesting presence.
I love that there is a workshop/class/series option for my workshops. My attendees reserve their place and pay upfront. I can duplicate these events or add future dates. It's wonderful. This saves us a lot of time and is so convenient.
I haven't had any trouble with my scheduler. It works flawlessly, so I don't have to take time out of my day to fix, troubleshoot or call customer service.
I love that I can add questions for my prospects to answer right away before booking a call. This means 3 fewer steps for me. 1. They answer these questions without an email from me. 2. They make their reservation and get a follow-up email, right away. 3. I customized the follow-up email with more details and actions to take to prepare for our call.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
Acuity Scheduling has been very reliable. If you don't believe me, check out their status page here. They do a pretty decent job maintaining their app. To be fair, it's a pretty simple tool so they shouldn't run into too many hiccups given it doesn't feature near as many options as other applications on the market run.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
It is very easy to use once you get to know the program but with years of working with the program I am still finding new things that I had wished I knew about earlier. I feel like aspects of the website become hidden that would help productivity a lot if I knew they existed beforehand.
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
Every time I had a question on how to do something or had any issues with Acuity Scheduling, mainly in the very beginning, when I was learning the platform, customer service was excellent. They were prompt to respond, friendly, and very helpful until I had the right solution.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
In the case of Schedulicity, the system was awesome (very easy to set up and had some nice features) but did not offer the functionality and flexibility that AcuityScheduling does. In the case of SimplyBook.me, they offer lots of functionality but the interface is extremely complex and you pay a la carte for features so you're going to pay exponentially more for the same set of features as compared to AcuityScheduling. Their customer service was also lacking, in my opinion.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.